论文检索

非恒定效应因果加性模型中的工具变量集合有效性检验AI 解读

Instrumental variable (IV) methods are powerful for causal effect estimation with unmeasured confounding, but in practice researchers often face a set of candidate IVs whose validity is difficult to determine from observational data. This paper studies the problem of testing the validity of IV sets under Causal Additive Models with Non-Constant Effects (CAM-NCE). To address this problem, we propose a testable condition, termed the Cross Auxiliary-based independence Test…

多个中介变量非随机缺失下的中介分析AI 解读

Causal mediation analysis serves as a key tool for uncovering the mediating mechanisms linking treatments to outcomes. Existing methods for mediation analysis with multiple mediators typically assume complete observations or missing-at-random and may yield biased estimation when mediator values are missing not at random (MNAR). This paper studies the identification and estimation of causal mediation effects with multiple mediators subject to MNAR missingness. We consider a…

通过反事实归因分摊两个风险因素的因果责任AI 解读

Unlike traditional causal inference, which prospectively evaluates the effects of causes, apportioning causal responsibility requires a retrospective assessment to deduce the causes of an outcome that has already occurred. This paper proposes a quantitative framework for apportioning causal responsibility between two binary risk factors that jointly contribute to a realized adverse outcome. Ideally, knowing the individual's latent causal type, defined by the potential…

二元结果下的个体风险量化AI 解读

Understanding treatment effect heterogeneity is crucial for reliable decision-making in treatment evaluation and selection. The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is widely used to capture treatment effect heterogeneity induced by observed covariates and to design individualized treatment policies. However, it is an average metric within subpopulations, which prevents it from revealing individual risk, potentially leading to misleading results. This article fills…

加性非线性与非常数效应模型中工具变量的可检验性AI 解读

We address the issue of the testability of instrumental variables derived from observational data. Most existing testable implications are centered on scenarios where the treatment is a discrete variable, e.g., instrumental inequality (Pearl, 1995), or where the effect is assumed to be constant, e.g., instrumental variables condition based on the principle of independent mechanisms (Burauel, 2023). However, treatments can often be continuous variables, such as drug dosages…

存在潜变量时非参数因果效应估计的局部协变量选择AI 解读

Estimating causal effects from nonexperimental data is a fundamental problem in many fields of science. A key component of this task is selecting an appropriate set of covariates for confounding adjustment to avoid bias. Most existing methods for covariate selection often assume the absence of latent variables and rely on learning the global network structure among variables. However, identifying the global structure can be unnecessary and inefficient, especially when our…

可控制伤害率的安全个体化处理规则AI 解读

Estimating individualized treatment rules (ITRs) is crucial for tailoring interventions in precision medicine. Typical ITR estimation methods rely on conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) to guide treatment assignments. However, such methods overlook individual-level harm within covariate-specific subpopulations, potentially leading many individuals to experience worse outcomes under CATE-based ITRs. In this article, we aim to estimate ITRs that maximize the reward…

利用辅助总体工具变量识别因果效应与多重稳健估计AI 解读

Estimating causal effects in a target population with unmeasured confounders is challenging, especially when instrumental variables (IVs) are unavailable. However, IVs from auxiliary populations with similar problems can help infer causal effects in the target population. While the homogeneous conditional average treatment effect assumption has been widely used for effect transportability, it has not been explored in IV-based data fusion. We include it as a basic approach,…

死亡截断与非随机缺失结局下的因果推断AI 解读

In clinical trials, principal stratification analysis is commonly employed to address the issue of truncation by death, where a subject dies before the outcome can be measured. However, in practice, many survivor outcomes may remain uncollected or be missing not at random, posing a challenge to standard principal stratification analyses. In this paper, we explore the identification, estimation, and bounds of the average treatment effect within a subpopulation of individuals…

有序结局下原因必要性概率的识别与界限AI 解读

Although the existing causal inference literature focuses on the forward-looking perspective by estimating effects of causes, the backward-looking perspective can provide insights into causes of effects. In backward-looking causal inference, the probability of necessity measures the probability that a certain event is caused by the treatment given the observed treatment and outcome. Most existing results focus on binary outcomes. Motivated by applications with ordinal…

数据组合下平均处理效应估计的比较分析AI 解读

There is growing interest in exploring causal effects in target populations via data combination. However, most approaches are tailored to specific settings and lack comprehensive comparative analyses. In this article, we focus on a typical scenario involving a source dataset and a target dataset. We first design six settings under covariate shift and conduct a comparative analysis by deriving the semiparametric efficiency bounds for the ATE in the target population. We then…

存在部分无效工具变量时双向孟德尔随机化的识别与估计AI 解读

We consider the challenging problem of estimating causal effects from purely observational data in the bi-directional Mendelian randomization (MR), where some invalid instruments, as well as unmeasured confounding, usually exist. To address this problem, most existing methods attempt to find proper valid instrumental variables (IVs) for the target causal effect by expert knowledge or by assuming that the causal model is a one-directional MR model. As such, in this paper, we…

用于估计含潜变量因果结构的广义独立噪声条件AI 解读

We investigate the task of learning causal structure in the presence of latent variables, including locating latent variables and determining their quantity, and identifying causal relationships among both latent and observed variables. To this end, we propose a Generalized Independent Noise (GIN) condition for linear non-Gaussian acyclic causal models that incorporate latent variables, which establishes the independence between a linear combination of certain measured…

自动选择未观测混杂因素的代理变量AI 解读

Recently, interest has grown in the use of proxy variables of unobserved confounding for inferring the causal effect in the presence of unmeasured confounders from observational data. One difficulty inhibiting the practical use is finding valid proxy variables of unobserved confounding to a target causal effect of interest. These proxy variables are typically justified by background knowledge. In this paper, we investigate the estimation of causal effects among multiple…

通过原因的后验效应评估连续结果的成因AI 解读

To evaluate a single cause of a binary effect, Dawid et al. (2014) defined the probability of causation, while Pearl (2015) defined the probabilities of necessity and sufficiency. For assessing the multiple correlated causes of a binary effect, Lu et al. (2023) defined the posterior causal effects based on post-treatment variables. In many scenarios, outcomes are continuous, simply binarizing them and applying previous methods may result in information loss or biased…

利用非混杂预测协变量提高双重稳健估计效率AI 解读

In observational studies, covariates with substantial missing data are often omitted, despite their strong predictive capabilities. These excluded covariates are generally believed not to simultaneously affect both treatment and outcome, indicating that they are not genuine confounders and do not impact the identification of the average treatment effect (ATE). In this paper, we introduce an alternative doubly robust (DR) estimator that fully leverages non-confounding…