跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
预印本来自 arXiv 计量经济学及相关统计、金融分类和主题检索。主题检索从 2021 年起回补;关注作者追溯更早年份,部分历史文献按已核验编号补录。收录不表示通过同行评审,仍可能遗漏。
本库首次提交范围:2004-06-23 — 2026-10-14。
阅读范围
默认显示本库全部预印本。可选“优先阅读”:至少一位作者同时满足有可核验的本站覆盖期刊正式发表记录,且 OpenAlex 总引用超过 1,000 次。按同一作者身份匹配,两项缺一不可。此筛选提供阅读线索,不作为论文质量判断。
日期与排序
默认按最近修订排序;年份和日期筛选使用首次提交时间。同一 arXiv 编号的修订会合并。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 6 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
6 篇论文
导出

Randomization inference for stepped-wedge designs with noncompliance with application to a palliative care pragmatic trial

存在不依从时阶梯楔形设计的随机化推断:姑息治疗试验应用

While palliative care is increasingly commonly delivered to hospitalized patients with serious illnesses, few studies have estimated its causal effects. Courtright et al. (2016) adopted a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design to assess the effect of palliative care on a patient-centered outcome. The randomized intervention was a nudge to administer palliative care but did not guarantee receipt of palliative care, resulting in noncompliance. A subsequent analysis using…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Design-based nested instrumental variable analysis

基于设计的嵌套工具变量分析

Two binary instrumental variables (IVs) are nested if individuals who comply under one binary IV also comply under the other. This situation often arises when the two IVs represent different intensities of encouragement or discouragement to take the treatment, with one stronger than the other. In a nested IV structure, treatment effects can be identified for two latent subgroups: always-compliers and switchers. Always-compliers are individuals who comply even under the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Enhanced inference for distributions and quantiles of individual treatment effects in various experiments

多类实验中个体处理效应分布与分位数的改进推断

Understanding treatment effect heterogeneity has become increasingly important in many fields. In this paper we study distributions and quantiles of individual treatment effects to provide a more comprehensive and robust understanding of treatment effects beyond usual averages, despite they are more challenging to infer due to nonidentifiability from observed data. Recent randomization-based approaches offer finite-sample valid inference for treatment effect distributions…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Time-varying treatment effect models in stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials with multiple interventions

多干预阶梯楔形整群随机试验中的时变处理效应模型

The traditional model specification of stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials assumes a homogeneous treatment effect across time while adjusting for fixed-time effects. However, when treatment effects vary over time, the constant effect estimator may be biased. In the general setting of stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials with multiple interventions, we derive the expected value of the constant effect estimator when the true treatment effects depend on exposure time…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Manipulating a Continuous Instrumental Variable in an Observational Study of Premature Babies: Algorithm, Partial Identification Bounds, and Inference under Randomization and Biased Randomization Assumptions

早产儿观察研究中连续工具变量的增强:匹配、部分识别界与推断

Regionalization of intensive care for premature babies refers to a triage system of mothers with high-risk pregnancies to hospitals of varied capabilities based on risks faced by infants. Due to the limited capacity of high-level hospitals, which are equipped with advanced expertise to provide critical care, understanding the effect of delivering premature babies at such hospitals on infant mortality for different subgroups of high-risk mothers could facilitate the design of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The role of randomization inference in unraveling individual treatment effects in early phase vaccine trials

早期疫苗试验中个体处理效应的随机化推断

Randomization inference is a powerful tool in early phase vaccine trials when estimating the causal effect of a regimen against a placebo or another regimen. Randomization-based inference often focuses on testing either Fisher's sharp null hypothesis of no treatment effect for any participant or Neyman's weak null hypothesis of no sample average treatment effect. Many recent efforts have explored conducting exact randomization-based inference for other summaries of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓