论文检索

SPARK：基于残差投影的通用拟合优度评估AI 解读

Goodness-of-fit testing is a basic tool for assessing whether a fitted procedure has captured the systematic information contained in the covariates. While traditional theory has largely focused on parametric regression models, modern data analysis increasingly relies on flexible black-box learners, whose predictive success alone is insufficient to assess model accuracy. In this paper, we propose SPARK, a general framework for goodness-of-fit testing that applies to…

后验漂移与潜在隐藏混杂下的试验证据迁移AI 解读

Randomized trials provide internally valid treatment-effect evidence, but trial participants may not represent the target population. In contrast, observational studies are often closer to the target population, but their treatment assignment may be affected by possible hidden confounding. We develop a robust posterior-drift framework for estimating the average treatment effect in an observational target population when exact conditional-effect transportability may fail. The…

利用随机试验评估观测数据的条件平均治疗效应估计AI 解读

Conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) are increasingly estimated from observational data and used to guide policy and individualized treatment decisions. Before such estimates can be trusted in practice, their predictive fitness needs to be assessed, yet observational data alone offer limited opportunities for doing so. We propose CATE Assessment via Fitness Evaluation (CAFE), a formal framework for directly assessing the goodness-of-fit of a CATE estimate learned…

个体处理效应无分布预测推断的不可能性AI 解读

Uncertainty quantification for individual treatment effects (ITEs) is a daunting challenge in causal inference. Motivated by recent advances in conformal prediction, several works aim to construct distribution-free prediction sets for ITEs with desired coverage under standard assumptions such as strong ignorability and overlap. In this paper, we show that such goals are fundamentally unattainable in the presence of continuous covariates. Specifically, we establish…

不等式约束参数空间中的最小p值得分检验AI 解读

Score tests have the advantage of requiring estimation alone of the model restricted by the null hypothesis, which often is much simpler than models defined under the alternative hypothesis. This is typically so when the alternative hypothesis involves inequality constraints. However, existing score tests address only jointly testing all parameters of interest; a leading example is testing all ARCH parameters or variances of random coefficients being zero or not. In such…