论文检索

存在溢出效应的实验与准实验：基于设计的检验和推断AI 解读

Economic policies rarely affect only their direct targets. To study these spillovers, researchers summarize who else was treated with a simple exposure measure, such as the share of treated neighbors within a radius. But for many settings, economic theory provides little guidance on choosing the functional form (e.g., ring) of that measure or its parameters (e.g., radius). We show that the data can inform both choices. Correctly specified exposure measures imply…

误设下溢出效应的分解：伪真估计目标与局部—全局扩展AI 解读

To measure spillovers, researchers often summarize who else was treated with a simple measure, such as the share of treated neighbors. We study what the researcher estimates when that summary is misspecified. We show that the researcher estimates the best approximation to the true policy effect among all functionals of the chosen summary, and that the usual direct and spillover estimates are exactly the components of this approximation. Under a monotonicity restriction, the…

动态一致的统计决策AI 解读

A large literature in econometrics proposes decision rules with optimality guarantees based on ex ante criteria, such as minimax regret. We develop a framework for analyzing the dynamic consistency of such rules and show that, in many empirically relevant settings, the researcher may wish to deviate from the interim prescription of ex ante optimal rules after observing the data realization. To address this problem, we propose and axiomatize two classes of optimality criteria…

从匹配、双重差分与混合设计中选择主要估计目标：最小最大遗憾方法AI 解读

Researchers using panel data to estimate causal effects routinely choose among three approaches to using past outcomes: difference-in-differences (DID), conditioning on lagged outcomes (matching, M), and a hybrid that does both (DIDM). The corresponding identifying assumptions are non-nested, leaving little guidance on which to report. We give conditions under which the corresponding estimands are ordered, with DIDM bracketed between matching and DID. This makes DIDM the…

匹配估计 ≤ 混合估计 ≤ 双重差分估计AI 解读

Since LaLonde's (1986) seminal paper, there has been ongoing interest in estimating treatment effects using pre- and post-intervention data. Scholars have traditionally used experimental benchmarks to evaluate the accuracy of alternative econometric methods, including Matching, Difference-in-Differences (DID), and their hybrid forms (e.g., Heckman et al., 1998b; Dehejia and Wahba, 2002; Smith and Todd, 2005). We revisit these methodologies in the evaluation of job training…

动态选择下实验与观察数据结合的信息含量AI 解读

This paper addresses the challenge of estimating the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated Survivors (ATETS; Vikstrom et al., 2018) in the absence of long-term experimental data, utilizing available long-term observational data instead. We establish two theoretical results. First, it is impossible to obtain informative bounds for the ATETS with no model restriction and no auxiliary data. Second, to overturn this negative result, we explore as a promising avenue the recent…

结合实验与观察数据进行长期政策评估的夹逼关系AI 解读

Combining short-term experimental data with observational data enables credible long-term policy evaluation. The literature offers two key but non-nested assumptions, namely the latent unconfoundedness (LU; Athey et al., 2020) and equi-confounding bias (ECB; Ghassami et al., 2022) conditions, to correct observational selection. Committing to the wrong assumption leads to biased estimation. To mitigate such risks, we provide a novel bracketing relationship (cf. Angrist and…

批次式多臂老虎机的渐近展开AI 解读

In bandit algorithms, the randomly time-varying adaptive experimental design makes it difficult to apply traditional limit theorems to off-policy evaluation of the treatment effect. Moreover, the normal approximation by the central limit theorem becomes unsatisfactory for lack of information due to the small sample size of the inferior arm. To resolve this issue, we introduce a backwards asymptotic expansion method and prove the validity of this scheme based on the partial…