跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
预印本来自 arXiv 计量经济学及相关统计、金融分类和主题检索。主题检索从 2021 年起回补;关注作者追溯更早年份,部分历史文献按已核验编号补录。收录不表示通过同行评审,仍可能遗漏。
本库首次提交范围:2004-06-23 — 2026-10-14。
阅读范围
默认显示本库全部预印本。可选“优先阅读”:至少一位作者同时满足有可核验的本站覆盖期刊正式发表记录,且 OpenAlex 总引用超过 1,000 次。按同一作者身份匹配,两项缺一不可。此筛选提供阅读线索,不作为论文质量判断。
日期与排序
默认按最近修订排序;年份和日期筛选使用首次提交时间。同一 arXiv 编号的修订会合并。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 10 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
10 篇论文
导出

From Estimands to Robust Inference of Treatment Effects in Master Protocol Trials

主方案试验:从目标量定义到治疗效应的稳健推断

Master protocol trials use a single overarching protocol to evaluate multiple interventions, diseases, or disease subtypes, where individuals are often randomized to different subsets of intervention arms based on individual characteristics, enrollment timing, and intervention availability. While offering increased flexibility, this constrained and non-uniform intervention assignment poses two fundamental inferential challenges: the precise definition of treatment effects…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Robust and Data-Adaptive Integration of Nonconcurrent Data in Platform Trials via Gaussian Processes

通过高斯过程稳健、自适应地整合平台试验非同期数据

A platform trial is an innovative clinical trial design that enables simultaneous and continuous evaluation of multiple treatments within a single master protocol. Existing robust methods restrict analyses to concurrently randomized participants due to concerns that including nonconcurrent data may introduce bias from temporal trends. However, this exclusion represents a missed opportunity to improve efficiency. We propose a Gaussian process framework for incorporating…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Evolving Longitudinal Patient Histories and Re-enrollment in Master Protocol Trials

主方案试验中的纵向患者历史与重复入组

A master protocol trial uses a single overarching protocol to test multiple therapies, often across several diseases or subtypes. Although such trials offer considerable flexibility and efficiency, their constrained and non-uniform treatment assignment raises two core challenges: precisely defining treatment effects and conducting robust, efficient inference. These challenges intensify when participants can re-enroll to receive additional eligible therapies over time. To…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating treatment effects with competing intercurrent events in randomized controlled trials

随机对照试验中存在竞争性伴发事件的处理效应估计

The analysis of randomized controlled trials is often complicated by intercurrent events (IEs) -- events that occur after treatment initiation and affect either the interpretation or existence of outcome measurements. Examples include treatment discontinuation or the use of additional medications. In two recent clinical trials for systemic lupus erythematosus with complications of IEs, we classify the IEs into two broad categories: effect-informative (e.g., treatment…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Improve the Precision of Area Under the Curve Estimation for Recurrent Events Through Covariate Adjustment

通过协变量调整提高复发事件曲线下面积估计精度

The area under the curve (AUC) of the mean cumulative function (MCF) has recently been introduced as a novel estimand for evaluating treatment effects in recurrent event settings, offering an alternative to the commonly used Lin-Wei-Yang-Ying (LWYY) model. The AUC of the MCF provides a clinically interpretable summary measure that captures the overall burden of disease progression, regardless of whether the proportionality assumption holds. To improve the precision of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Clarifying the Role of the Mantel-Haenszel Risk Difference Estimator in Randomized Clinical Trials

厘清随机临床试验中 Mantel–Haenszel 风险差估计量的作用

The Mantel-Haenszel (MH) risk difference estimator, commonly used in randomized clinical trials for binary outcomes, calculates a weighted average of stratum-specific risk difference estimators. Traditionally, this method requires the stringent assumption that risk differences are homogeneous across strata, also known as the common (constant) risk difference assumption. In our article, we relax this assumption and adopt a modern perspective, viewing the MH risk difference…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A General Form of Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Clinical Trials

随机临床试验中协变量调整的一般形式

In randomized clinical trials, adjusting for baseline covariates can improve credibility and efficiency for demonstrating and quantifying treatment effects. This article studies the augmented inverse propensity weighted (AIPW) estimator, which is a general form of covariate adjustment that uses linear, generalized linear, and non-parametric or machine learning models for the conditional mean of the response given covariates. Under covariate-adaptive randomization, we…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Robust Variance Estimation for Covariate-Adjusted Unconditional Treatment Effect in Randomized Clinical Trials with Binary Outcomes

二元结局随机试验中协变量调整无条件处理效应的稳健方差估计

To improve precision of estimation and power of testing hypothesis for an unconditional treatment effect in randomized clinical trials with binary outcomes, researchers and regulatory agencies recommend using g-computation as a reliable method of covariate adjustment. However, the practical application of g-computation is hindered by the lack of an explicit robust variance formula that can be used for different unconditional treatment effects of interest. To fill this gap,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Covariate-Adjusted Log-Rank Test: Guaranteed Efficiency Gain and Universal Applicability

协变量调整的对数秩检验:效率增益与广泛适用性

Nonparametric covariate adjustment is considered for log-rank type tests of treatment effect with right-censored time-to-event data from clinical trials applying covariate-adaptive randomization. Our proposed covariate-adjusted log-rank test has a simple explicit formula and a guaranteed efficiency gain over the unadjusted test. We also show that our proposed test achieves universal applicability in the sense that the same formula of test can be universally applied to simple…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Testing for Treatment Effect Twice Using Internal and External Controls in Clinical Trials

结合内部与外部对照对临床试验处理效应进行双重检验

Leveraging external controls -- relevant individual patient data under control from external trials or real-world data -- has the potential to reduce the cost of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) while increasing the proportion of trial patients given access to novel treatments. However, due to lack of randomization, RCT patients and external controls may differ with respect to covariates that may or may not have been measured. Hence, after controlling for measured…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓