跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
预印本来自 arXiv 计量经济学及相关统计、金融分类和主题检索。主题检索从 2021 年起回补;关注作者追溯更早年份,部分历史文献按已核验编号补录。收录不表示通过同行评审,仍可能遗漏。
本库首次提交范围:2004-06-23 — 2026-10-14。
阅读范围
默认显示本库全部预印本。可选“优先阅读”:至少一位作者同时满足有可核验的本站覆盖期刊正式发表记录,且 OpenAlex 总引用超过 1,000 次。按同一作者身份匹配,两项缺一不可。此筛选提供阅读线索,不作为论文质量判断。
日期与排序
默认按最近修订排序;年份和日期筛选使用首次提交时间。同一 arXiv 编号的修订会合并。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 9 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
9 篇论文
导出

Integrating Heterogeneous Information in Randomized Experiments: A Unified Calibration Framework

整合随机实验中的异质信息:统一校准框架

In modern randomized experiments, large-scale data collection increasingly yields rich baseline covariates and auxiliary information from multiple sources. Such information offers opportunities for more precise treatment effect estimation, but it also raises the challenge of integrating heterogeneous information coherently without compromising validity. Covariate-adaptive randomization (CAR) is widely used to improve covariate balance at the design stage, but it typically…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Covariance-Driven Regression Trees: Reducing Overfitting in CART

协方差驱动的回归树:降低CART过拟合

Decision trees are powerful machine learning algorithms, widely used in fields such as economics and medicine for their simplicity and interpretability. However, decision trees such as CART are prone to overfitting, especially when grown deep or the sample size is small. Conventional methods to reduce overfitting include pre-pruning and post-pruning, which constrain the growth of uninformative branches. In this paper, we propose a complementary approach by introducing a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Assumption-lean covariate adjustment under covariate adaptive randomization when $p = o (n)$

协变量自适应随机化下 p=o(n) 的弱模型假设协变量调整

Adjusting for (baseline) covariates with working regression models becomes standard practice in the analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT). When the dimension $p$ of the covariates is large relative to the sample size $n$, specifically $p = o (n)$, adjusting for covariates even in a linear working model by ordinary least squares can yield overly large bias, defeating the purpose of improving efficiency. This issue arises when no structural assumptions are imposed on…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Minimax Optimal Design with Spillover and Carryover Effects

兼顾溢出与延续效应的极小极大最优实验设计

In various applications, the potential outcome of a unit may be influenced by the treatments received by other units, a phenomenon known as interference, as well as by prior treatments, referred to as carryover effects. These phenomena violate the stable unit treatment value assumption and pose significant challenges in causal inference. To address these complexities, we propose a minimax optimal experimental design that simultaneously accounts for both spillover and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Incorporating external data for analyzing randomized clinical trials: A transfer learning approach

利用外部数据分析随机临床试验:迁移学习方法

Randomized clinical trials are the gold standard for analyzing treatment effects, but high costs and ethical concerns can limit recruitment, potentially leading to invalid inferences. Incorporating external trial data with similar characteristics into the analysis using transfer learning appears promising for addressing these issues. In this paper, we present a formal framework for applying transfer learning to the analysis of clinical trials, considering three key…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Treatment effect estimation under covariate-adaptive randomization with heavy-tailed outcomes

重尾结果下协变量自适应随机化的处理效应估计

Randomized experiments are the gold standard for investigating causal relationships, with comparisons of potential outcomes under different treatment groups used to estimate treatment effects. However, outcomes with heavy-tailed distributions pose significant challenges to traditional statistical approaches. While recent studies have explored these issues under simple randomization, their application in more complex randomization designs, such as stratified randomization or…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Interaction tests with covariate-adaptive randomization

协变量自适应随机化下的交互效应检验

Treatment-covariate interaction tests are commonly applied by researchers to examine whether the treatment effect varies across patient subgroups defined by baseline characteristics. The objective of this study is to explore treatment-covariate interaction tests involving covariate-adaptive randomization. Without assuming a parametric data generating model, we investigate usual interaction tests and observe that they tend to be conservative: specifically, their limiting…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating and Mitigating the Congestion Effect of Curbside Pick-ups and Drop-offs: A Causal Inference Approach

路边上下客拥堵效应的估计与缓解:因果推断方法

Curb space is one of the busiest areas in urban road networks. Especially in recent years, the rapid increase of ride-hailing trips and commercial deliveries has induced massive pick-ups/drop-offs (PUDOs), which occupy the limited curb space that was designed and built decades ago. These PUDOs could jam curbside utilization and disturb the mainline traffic flow, evidently leading to significant negative societal externalities. However, there is a lack of an analytical…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A unified framework for covariate adjustment under stratified randomization

分层随机化下协变量调整的统一框架

Randomization, as a key technique in clinical trials, can eliminate sources of bias and produce comparable treatment groups. In randomized experiments, the treatment effect is a parameter of general interest. Researchers have explored the validity of using linear models to estimate the treatment effect and perform covariate adjustment and thus improve the estimation efficiency. However, the relationship between covariates and outcomes is not necessarily linear, and is often…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓