论文检索

一般处理类型下稳健匹配观察研究：一致性、效率与适应性AI 解读

To ensure reliable causal conclusions from observational studies, researchers routinely conduct sensitivity analysis to assess robustness to unmeasured confounding. In matched observational studies (one of the most popular observational study designs), two foundational concepts, design sensitivity and Bahadur-Rosenbaum efficiency, are used to quantify the robustness of test statistics and study designs in sensitivity analyses. Unfortunately, these measures of robustness are…

倾向得分传播：未知倾向得分下基于设计的推断框架AI 解读

Design-based inference, also known as randomization-based or finite-population inference, provides a principled framework for trustworthy statistical inference. It attributes randomness solely to the design mechanism, such as treatment assignment, survey sampling, or missingness, without imposing super-population distributional or modeling assumptions on the outcome data. From the seminal work of Fisher and Neyman to its recent resurgence, design-based inference has played a…

非精确匹配观察研究中平均处理效应的随机化推断AI 解读

Matching is a widely used causal inference design that aims to approximate a randomized experiment using observational data by forming matched sets of treated and control units based on similarities in their covariates. Ideally, treated units are exactly matched with controls on these covariates, enabling randomization-based inference for treatment effects as in a randomized experiment, under the assumption of no unobserved covariates. However, inexact matching often occurs,…

匹配观察研究敏感性分析中可观测偏差与隐藏偏差的协调AI 解读

Matching is one of the most widely used causal inference designs in observational studies, but post-matching confounding bias remains a critical concern. This bias includes overt bias from inexact matching on measured confounders and hidden bias from unmeasured confounders. Researchers routinely apply the famous Rosenbaum-type sensitivity analysis after matching to assess the impact of these biases on causal conclusions. In this work, we show that this approach is often…

一般处理类型的析因匹配观察性研究：设计、分析与应用AI 解读

Matching is one of the most widely used causal inference frameworks in observational studies. However, all the existing matching-based causal inference methods are designed for either a single treatment with general treatment types (e.g., binary, ordinal, or continuous) or factorial (multiple) treatments with binary treatments only. To our knowledge, no existing matching-based causal methods can handle factorial treatments with general treatment types. This critical gap…

适用于一般处理类型的双重差分非二分匹配框架AI 解读

Difference-in-differences (DID) is one of the most widely used causal inference frameworks in observational studies. However, most existing DID methods are designed for binary treatments and cannot be readily applied to non-binary treatment settings. Although recent work has begun to extend DID to non-binary (e.g., continuous) treatments, these approaches typically require strong additional assumptions, including parametric outcome models or the presence of idealized…

结果缺失下的设计型因果推断：缺失机制、插补随机化检验与协变量调整AI 解读

Design-based causal inference, also known as randomization-based or finite-population causal inference, is one of the most widely used causal inference frameworks, largely due to the merit that its validity can be guaranteed by study design (e.g., randomized experiments) and does not require assuming specific outcome-generating distributions or super-population models. Despite its advantages, design-based causal inference can still suffer from other issues, among which…

连续处理匹配观察研究的偏差缓解：卡尺非二分匹配与偏差修正推断AI 解读

In matched observational studies with continuous treatments, individuals with different treatment doses but the same or similar covariate values are paired for causal inference. While inexact covariate matching (i.e., covariate imbalance after matching) is common in practice, previous matched studies with continuous treatments have often overlooked this issue as long as post-matching covariate balance meets certain criteria. Through re-analyzing a matched observational study…

利用整数规划分析随机化检验对二元结局误分类的敏感性AI 解读

Conducting a randomization test is a common method for testing causal null hypotheses in randomized experiments. The popularity of randomization tests is largely because their statistical validity only depends on the randomization design, and no distributional or modeling assumption on the outcome variable is needed. However, randomization tests may still suffer from other sources of bias, among which outcome misclassification is a significant one. We propose a model-free…

衔接设计与分析：处理剂量匹配观察研究的随机化推断与敏感性分析AI 解读

Matching is a commonly used causal inference study design in observational studies. Through matching on measured confounders between different treatment groups, valid randomization inferences can be conducted under the no unmeasured confounding assumption, and sensitivity analysis can be further performed to assess sensitivity of randomization inference results to potential unmeasured confounding. However, for many common matching designs, there is still a lack of valid…

连续暴露与二元结局匹配观察研究的敏感性分析AI 解读

Matching is one of the most widely used study designs for adjusting for measured confounders in observational studies. However, unmeasured confounding may exist and cannot be removed by matching. Therefore, a sensitivity analysis is typically needed to assess a causal conclusion's sensitivity to unmeasured confounding. Sensitivity analysis frameworks for binary exposures have been well-established for various matching designs and are commonly used in various studies.…