论文检索

通过反事实归因分摊两个风险因素的因果责任AI 解读

Unlike traditional causal inference, which prospectively evaluates the effects of causes, apportioning causal responsibility requires a retrospective assessment to deduce the causes of an outcome that has already occurred. This paper proposes a quantitative framework for apportioning causal responsibility between two binary risk factors that jointly contribute to a realized adverse outcome. Ideally, knowing the individual's latent causal type, defined by the potential…

自适应实验的选择性随机化推断AI 解读

Adaptive experiments use preliminary analyses of the data to inform further course of action and are commonly used in many disciplines including medical and social sciences. Because the null hypothesis and experimental design are data-dependent, it has long been recognized that statistical inference for adaptive experiments is not straightforward. Most existing methods only apply to specific adaptive designs and rely on strong assumptions. In this work, we propose selective…

通过迭代扩展因果图选择混杂变量AI 解读

Confounder selection, namely choosing a set of covariates to control for confounding between a treatment and an outcome, is arguably the most important step in the design of an observational study. Previous methods, such as Pearl's back-door criterion, typically require pre-specifying a causal graph, which can often be difficult in practice. We propose an interactive procedure for confounder selection that does not require pre-specifying the graph or the set of observed…

利用偏相关的未观测混杂优化敏感性分析AI 解读

Causal inference necessarily relies upon untestable assumptions; hence, it is crucial to assess the robustness of obtained results to violations of identification assumptions. However, such sensitivity analysis is only occasionally undertaken in practice, as many existing methods require analytically tractable solutions and their results are often difficult to interpret. We take a more flexible approach to sensitivity analysis and view it as a constrained stochastic…

离策略学习中状态变量选择的图方法AI 解读

Sequential decision problems are widely studied across many areas of science. A key challenge when learning policies from historical data - a practice commonly referred to as off-policy learning - is how to ``identify'' the impact of a policy of interest when the observed data are not randomized. Off-policy learning has mainly been studied in two settings: dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs), where the focus is on controlling confounding in medical problems with short decision…

滞后与溢出处理效应的多个条件随机化检验AI 解读

We consider the problem of constructing multiple independent conditional randomization tests using a single dataset. Because the tests are independent, the randomization p-values can be interpreted individually and combined using standard methods for multiple testing. We give a simple, sequential construction of such tests, and then discuss its application to three problems: Rosenbaum's evidence factors for observational studies, lagged treatment effect in stepped-wedge…

什么是随机化检验？AI 解读

The meaning of randomization tests has become obscure in statistics education and practice over the last century. This article makes a fresh attempt at rectifying this core concept of statistics. A new term -- "quasi-randomization test" -- is introduced to define significance tests based on theoretical models and distinguish these tests from the "randomization tests" based on the physical act of randomization. The practical importance of this distinction is illustrated…

随机实验中回归调整的统一分析AI 解读

Regression adjustment is broadly applied in randomized trials under the premise that it usually improves the precision of a treatment effect estimator. However, previous work has shown that this is not always true. To further understand this phenomenon, we develop a unified comparison of the asymptotic variance of a class of linear regression-adjusted estimators. Our analysis is based on the classical theory for linear regression with heteroscedastic errors and thus does not…