跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
预印本来自 arXiv 计量经济学及相关统计、金融分类和主题检索。主题检索从 2021 年起回补;关注作者追溯更早年份,部分历史文献按已核验编号补录。收录不表示通过同行评审,仍可能遗漏。
本库首次提交范围:2004-06-23 — 2026-10-14。
阅读范围
默认显示本库全部预印本。可选“优先阅读”:至少一位作者同时满足有可核验的本站覆盖期刊正式发表记录,且 OpenAlex 总引用超过 1,000 次。按同一作者身份匹配,两项缺一不可。此筛选提供阅读线索,不作为论文质量判断。
日期与排序
默认按最近修订排序;年份和日期筛选使用首次提交时间。同一 arXiv 编号的修订会合并。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 4 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
4 篇论文
导出

Identification and Estimation of Causal Estimands with Missing Not at Random Data

非随机缺失数据下因果目标量的识别与估计

Missing not at random (MNAR) data pose significant challenges for causal inference, particularly when both confounders and the outcome are partially observed. Without additional assumptions beyond those required for causal inference, causal estimands are generally not identifiable under MNAR mechanisms. This paper first develops identification results for the causal estimand, the average treatment effect, under several plausible MNAR mechanisms using completeness conditions,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Unified Three-Stage Weighting Framework for Causal Inference and Mediation Analysis under Case-Control Sampling

病例对照抽样下因果推断与中介分析的统一三阶段加权框架

Case-control studies are widely used in epidemiology and biomedical research because they provide substantial efficiency gains when outcomes are rare or prospective follow-up is impractical. However, retrospective outcome-dependent sampling distorts the population outcome distribution, creating fundamental challenges for causal inference. We propose a unified three-stage weighting (3S-weighting) framework for causal inference and causal mediation analysis from case--control…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Sensitivity Analysis of Inverse Probability Weighting Estimators of Causal Effects in Observational Studies with Multivalued Treatments

多值处理观察性研究中因果效应逆概率加权估计的敏感性分析

One of the fundamental challenges in drawing causal inferences from observational studies is that the assumption of no unmeasured confounding is not testable from observed data. Therefore, assessing sensitivity to this assumption's violation is important to obtain valid causal conclusions in observational studies. Although several sensitivity analysis frameworks are available in the casual inference literature, very few of them are applicable to observational studies with…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Risk-Ratio-Based Marginal Sensitivity Model for Causal Effects in Observational Studies

观察性研究中基于风险比的因果效应边际敏感性模型

In observational studies, the identification of causal estimands depends on the no unmeasured confounding (NUC) assumption. As this assumption is not testable from observed data, sensitivity analysis plays an important role in observational studies to investigate the impact of unmeasured confounding on the causal conclusions. In this paper, we proposed a risk-ratio-based sensitivity analysis framework by introducing a modified marginal sensitivity model for observational…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓