论文检索

非线性孟德尔随机化研究中的因果估计与推断AI 解读

Mendelian randomization (MR) is widely used to uncover causal relationships in the presence of unmeasured confounders. However, most existing MR methods presuppose linear causality, risking bias when the true relationships are nonlinear, which is a common empirical scenario. In this paper, we compared two prevalent instrumental variable techniques (the two-stage prediction method and the control function method) under both linear and nonlinear settings, and addressed key…

面向因果推断的倾向得分适配协变量选择AI 解读

In this paper, we propose a propensity score adapted variable selection procedure to select covariates for inclusion in propensity score models, in order to eliminate confounding bias and improve statistical efficiency in observational studies. Our variable selection approach is specially designed for causal inference, it only requires the propensity scores to be $\sqrt{n}$-consistently estimated through a parametric model and need not correct specification of potential…

因果推断中的方差降低AI 解读

Propensity score methods have been shown to be powerful in obtaining efficient estimators of average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data, especially under the existence of confounding factors. When estimating, deciding which type of covariates need to be included in the propensity score function is important, since incorporating some unnecessary covariates may amplify both bias and variance of estimators of ATE. In this paper, we show that including additional…