跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
预印本来自 arXiv 计量经济学及相关统计、金融分类和主题检索。主题检索从 2021 年起回补;关注作者追溯更早年份,部分历史文献按已核验编号补录。收录不表示通过同行评审,仍可能遗漏。
本库首次提交范围:2004-06-23 — 2026-10-14。
阅读范围
默认显示本库全部预印本。可选“优先阅读”:至少一位作者同时满足有可核验的本站覆盖期刊正式发表记录,且 OpenAlex 总引用超过 1,000 次。按同一作者身份匹配,两项缺一不可。此筛选提供阅读线索,不作为论文质量判断。
日期与排序
默认按最近修订排序;年份和日期筛选使用首次提交时间。同一 arXiv 编号的修订会合并。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 7 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
7 篇论文
导出

Frugal, Flexible, Faithful: Causal Data Simulation via Frengression

简约、灵活、忠实:通过 Frengression 模拟因果数据

Machine learning has revitalized causal inference by combining flexible models and principled estimators, yet robust benchmarking and evaluation remain challenging with real-world data. In this work, we introduce frengression, a deep generative realization of the frugal parameterization that models the joint distribution of covariates, treatments and outcomes around the causal margin of interest. Frengression provides accurate estimation and flexible, faithful simulation of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal-ICM: A Data Fusion Framework For Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation With Multi-Task Gaussian Processes

Causal-ICM:用多任务高斯过程融合数据估计异质处理效应

Bridging the gap between internal and external validity is crucial for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), favoured for their internal validity due to randomisation, often encounter challenges in generalising findings due to strict eligibility criteria. Observational studies, on the other hand, may provide stronger external validity through larger and more representative samples but can suffer from compromised internal validity due…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Experiment-selector cross-validated targeted maximum likelihood estimator for hybrid RCT-external data studies

用于随机试验与外部数据混合研究的实验选择交叉验证 TMLE

Augmenting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with external data may increase power at the risk of introducing bias. To select and analyze the experiment (RCT alone or combined with external data) with the optimal bias-variance tradeoff, we develop a novel experiment-selector cross-validated targeted maximum likelihood estimator for randomized-external data studies (ES-CVTMLE). This estimator utilizes two estimates of bias to determine whether to integrate external data…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Exact Simulation of Longitudinal Data from Marginal Structural Models

从边际结构模型精确模拟纵向数据

Simulating longitudinal data from specified marginal structural models is a crucial but challenging task for evaluating causal inference methods and informing study design. While data generation typically proceeds in a fully conditional manner using structural equations according to a temporal ordering, it is difficult to ensure alignment between conditional distributions and the target marginal causal effects, which presents a fundamental challenge. To address this, we…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Adaptive-TMLE for the Average Treatment Effect based on Randomized Controlled Trial Augmented with Real-World Data

结合随机试验与真实世界数据的平均处理效应自适应 TMLE

We consider the problem of estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) when both randomized control trial (RCT) data and external real-world data (RWD) are available. We decompose the ATE estimand as the difference between a pooled-ATE estimand that integrates RCT and RWD and a bias estimand that captures the conditional effect of RCT enrollment on the outcome. We introduce an adaptive targeted maximum likelihood estimation (A-TMLE) framework to estimate them. We prove…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Data fusion for efficiency gain in ATE estimation: A practical review with simulations

数据融合提升平均处理效应估计效率:实用综述与模拟

The integration of real-world data (RWD) and randomized controlled trials (RCT) is increasingly important for advancing causal inference in scientific research. This combination holds great promise for enhancing the efficiency of causal effect estimation, offering benefits such as reduced trial participant numbers and expedited drug access for patients. Despite the availability of numerous data fusion methods, selecting the most appropriate one for a specific research…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Combining experimental and observational data through a power likelihood

通过幂似然结合实验与观察数据

Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard for causal inference and play a pivotal role in modern evidence-based medicine. However, the sample sizes they use are often too limited to draw significant causal conclusions for subgroups that are less prevalent in the population. In contrast, observational data are becoming increasingly accessible in large volumes but can be subject to bias as a result of hidden confounding. Given these complementary features, we propose…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓