论文检索

一般处理类型下稳健匹配观察研究：一致性、效率与适应性AI 解读

To ensure reliable causal conclusions from observational studies, researchers routinely conduct sensitivity analysis to assess robustness to unmeasured confounding. In matched observational studies (one of the most popular observational study designs), two foundational concepts, design sensitivity and Bahadur-Rosenbaum efficiency, are used to quantify the robustness of test statistics and study designs in sensitivity analyses. Unfortunately, these measures of robustness are…

放宽可迁移性假设的随机试验效应外推：美国选举政治广告案例AI 解读

During the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Aggarwal et al. (2023) conducted a large-scale randomized experiment to evaluate a digital ad campaign against Trump in five battleground states. While the study found no effect on voter turnout, it's unclear whether this null result generalizes to other battleground states, notably Georgia, which played a unique role in the 2020 election and differs from the battleground states. Inspired by the study, we present a transfer…

一般处理类型的析因匹配观察性研究：设计、分析与应用AI 解读

Matching is one of the most widely used causal inference frameworks in observational studies. However, all the existing matching-based causal inference methods are designed for either a single treatment with general treatment types (e.g., binary, ordinal, or continuous) or factorial (multiple) treatments with binary treatments only. To our knowledge, no existing matching-based causal methods can handle factorial treatments with general treatment types. This critical gap…

适用于一般处理类型的双重差分非二分匹配框架AI 解读

Difference-in-differences (DID) is one of the most widely used causal inference frameworks in observational studies. However, most existing DID methods are designed for binary treatments and cannot be readily applied to non-binary treatment settings. Although recent work has begun to extend DID to non-binary (e.g., continuous) treatments, these approaches typically require strong additional assumptions, including parametric outcome models or the presence of idealized…

SLOPE：为总体推广设计稳健研究AI 解读

A popular task in generalization is to learn about a new, target population based on data from an existing, source population. This task relies on conditional exchangeability, which asserts that differences between the source and target populations are fully captured by observable characteristics of the two populations. Unfortunately, this assumption is often untenable in practice due to unobservable differences between the source and target populations. Worse, the…

多变量孟德尔随机化的一种更稳健方法AI 解读

Multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer the direct effects of multiple exposures on an outcome. However, unlike univariable Mendelian randomization, MVMR often faces greater challenges with many weak instruments, which can lead to bias not necessarily toward zero and inflation of type I errors. In this work, we introduce a new asymptotic regime that allows exposures to have varying degrees of instrument strength,…

利用多个替代指标估计处理效应：替代得分与替代指数AI 解读

Estimating the long-term effects of treatments is of interest in many fields. A common challenge in estimating such treatment effects is that long-term outcomes are unobserved in the time frame needed to make policy decisions. One approach to overcome this missing data problem is to analyze treatments effects on an intermediate outcome, often called a statistical surrogate, if it satisfies the condition that treatment and outcome are independent conditional on the…

无效工具变量下的识别与推断AI 解读

Instrumental variables (IVs) are widely used to study the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome in the presence of unmeasured confounding. IVs require an instrument, a variable that is (A1) associated with the exposure, (A2) has no direct effect on the outcome except through the exposure, and (A3) is not related to unmeasured confounders. Unfortunately, finding variables that satisfy conditions (A2) or (A3) can be challenging in practice. This paper reviews works where…

多层级研究中更高效的双重稳健非参数处理效应估计量AI 解读

When studying treatment effects in multilevel studies, investigators commonly use (semi-)parametric estimators, which make strong parametric assumptions about the outcome, the treatment, and/or the correlation structure between study units in a cluster. We propose a novel estimator of treatment effects that does not make such assumptions. Specifically, the new estimator is shown to be doubly robust, asymptotically Normal, and often more efficient than existing estimators,…

面向敏感学生数据的稳健差分隐私随机实验AI 解读

Randomized control trials (RCTs) have been the gold standard to evaluate the effectiveness of a program, policy, or treatment on an outcome of interest. However, many RCTs assume that study participants are willing to share their (potentially sensitive) data, specifically their response to treatment. This assumption, while trivial at first, is becoming difficult to satisfy in the modern era, especially in online settings where there are more regulations to protect…

部分干扰下的同伴鼓励设计与局部平均网络效应识别AI 解读

In non-network settings, encouragement designs have been widely used to analyze causal effects of a treatment, policy, or intervention on an outcome of interest when randomizing the treatment was considered impractical or when compliance to treatment cannot be perfectly enforced. Unfortunately, such questions related to treatment compliance have received less attention in network settings and the most well-studied experimental design in networks, the two-stage randomization…