跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
预印本来自 arXiv 计量经济学及相关统计、金融分类和主题检索。主题检索从 2021 年起回补;关注作者追溯更早年份,部分历史文献按已核验编号补录。收录不表示通过同行评审,仍可能遗漏。
本库首次提交范围:2004-06-23 — 2026-10-14。
阅读范围
默认显示本库全部预印本。可选“优先阅读”:至少一位作者同时满足有可核验的本站覆盖期刊正式发表记录,且 OpenAlex 总引用超过 1,000 次。按同一作者身份匹配,两项缺一不可。此筛选提供阅读线索,不作为论文质量判断。
日期与排序
默认按最近修订排序;年份和日期筛选使用首次提交时间。同一 arXiv 编号的修订会合并。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 8 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
8 篇论文
导出

The Generalized Falsification Adaptive Set for Violations of the Exclusion Restriction and Exogeneity

针对排除限制与外生性违背的广义证伪适应集

The falsification adaptive set (FAS) as proposed by Masten and Poirier (2021) provides an identified set for a treatment effect when the baseline model is falsified, assuming invalid instruments violate exclusion only. We show that whether an invalid instrument is a confounder or collider has important consequences: incorrect treatment can cause the FAS to exclude the true parameter. We derive pattern-specific falsification adaptive sets for each combination of violations…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Two-Sample IV: Efficient Two-Step Estimation and Tests for Overidentification and Weak-Instruments

两样本工具变量:有效两步估计、过度识别与弱工具检验

Two-sample IV is a popular estimation method when the outcome and treatment variables are available in different samples, whereas instruments are available in both samples. The standard estimator is two-sample two-stage least squares estimator, which is efficient under homoskedasticity and homogeneity of the samples. We develop a robust two-step procedure for efficient estimation under general heteroskedasticity and heterogeneity of the samples, and propose a related…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Best Feasible Conditional Critical Values for a More Powerful Subvector Anderson-Rubin Test

更有检验力的子向量 Anderson–Rubin 检验:最佳可行条件临界值

For subvector inference in the linear instrumental variables model under homoskedasticity but allowing for weak instruments, Guggenberger, Kleibergen, and Mavroeidis (2019) (GKM) propose a conditional subvector Anderson and Rubin (1949) (AR) test that uses data-dependent critical values that adapt to the strength of the parameters not under test. This test has correct size and strictly higher power than the test that uses standard asymptotic chi-square critical values. The…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Overidentification testing with weak instruments and heteroskedasticity

弱工具变量与异方差下的过度识别检验

Exogeneity is key for IV estimators, which can assessed via overidentification (OID) tests. We discuss the Kleibergen-Paap (KP) rank test as a heteroskedasticity-robust OID test and compare to the typical J-test. We derive the heteroskedastic weak-instrument limiting distributions for J and KP as special cases of the robust score test estimated via 2SLS and LIML respectively. Monte Carlo simulations show that KP usually performs better than J, which is prone to severe size…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The Robust F-Statistic as a Test for Weak Instruments

稳健 F 统计量作为弱工具变量检验

Montiel Olea and Pflueger (2013) proposed the effective F-statistic as a test for weak instruments in terms of the Nagar bias of the two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimator relative to a benchmark worst-case bias. We show that their methodology applies to a class of linear generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators with an associated class of generalized effective F-statistics. The standard nonhomoskedasticity robust F-statistic is a member of this class. The associated…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

On the instrumental variable estimation with many weak and invalid instruments

大量弱且无效工具变量下的工具变量估计

We discuss the fundamental issue of identification in linear instrumental variable (IV) models with unknown IV validity. With the assumption of the "sparsest rule", which is equivalent to the plurality rule but becomes operational in computation algorithms, we investigate and prove the advantages of non-convex penalized approaches over other IV estimators based on two-step selections, in terms of selection consistency and accommodation for individually weak IVs. Furthermore,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Selecting Valid Instrumental Variables in Linear Models with Multiple Exposure Variables: Adaptive Lasso and the Median-of-Medians Estimator

多暴露线性模型中的有效工具变量选择:自适应 Lasso 与中位数的中位数估计量

In a linear instrumental variables (IV) setting for estimating the causal effects of multiple confounded exposure/treatment variables on an outcome, we investigate the adaptive Lasso method for selecting valid instrumental variables from a set of available instruments that may contain invalid ones. An instrument is invalid if it fails the exclusion conditions and enters the model as an explanatory variable. We extend the results as developed in Windmeijer et al. (2019) for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Weak Instruments, First-Stage Heteroskedasticity, the Robust F-Test and a GMM Estimator with the Weight Matrix Based on First-Stage Residuals

弱工具变量、第一阶段异方差、稳健 F 检验与基于第一阶段残差的 GMM

This paper is concerned with the findings related to the robust first-stage F-statistic in the Monte Carlo analysis of Andrews (2018), who found in a heteroskedastic grouped-data design that even for very large values of the robust F-statistic, the standard 2SLS confidence intervals had large coverage distortions. This finding appears to discredit the robust F-statistic as a test for underidentification. However, it is shown here that large values of the robust F-statistic…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓