论文检索

计数数据的去偏机器学习：基于神经网络的部分线性 Poisson 模型AI 解读

We develop a novel debiased machine learning (DML) estimator to analyze count data, which are common in clinical or biomedical studies. Specifically, we estimate the effect of a binary treatment on count outcomes using a partially linear Poisson model. A key advantage of this model is that it represents the complex covariate structure through a nuisance function, which is estimated flexibly using neural networks. We use a Neyman-orthogonal score function to construct the…

基于半参数累积概率模型的双重稳健分位数处理效应估计AI 解读

The causal inference literature has traditionally focused on estimating the mean of the potential outcome, whereas evaluating how a treatment affects the entire outcome distribution can provide additional information in biomedical research. Quantile treatment effect (QTE) captures such distributional differences, particularly when outcomes are skewed. However, existing approaches for estimating QTE make distributional assumptions about the outcome and are thus sensitive to…

用双重机器学习估计多种处理及其交互效应AI 解读

Causal inference literature has extensively focused on binary treatments, with relatively fewer methods developed for multi-valued treatments. In particular, methods for multiple simultaneously assigned treatments remain understudied despite their practical importance. This paper introduces two settings: (1) estimating the effects of multiple treatments of different types (binary, categorical, and continuous) and the effects of treatment interactions, and (2) estimating the…

多参数广义耙估计的最优两阶段抽样设计AI 解读

Large observational datasets, including those derived from electronic health records, are a valuable resource for medical research but are often affected by missingness, measurement error, and misclassification. Two-phase sampling with generalized raking (GR) estimation is an efficient and robust approach to statistical inference in such settings. In this approach, variables that are unavailable or measured with error in a large phase 1 cohort are obtained with…

混杂变量缺失时的处理效应评估：双重稳健与传统缺失数据方法比较AI 解读

In pharmacoepidemiology, safety and effectiveness are frequently evaluated using readily available administrative and electronic health records data. In these settings, detailed confounder data are often not available in all data sources and therefore missing on a subset of individuals. Multiple imputation (MI) and inverse-probability weighting (IPW) are go-to analytical methods to handle missing data and are dominant in the biomedical literature. Doubly-robust methods,…

两阶段抽样下结局与处理均有测量误差的高效因果效应估计AI 解读

Measurement error is a common challenge for causal inference studies using electronic health record (EHR) data, where clinical outcomes and treatments are frequently mismeasured. Researchers often address measurement error by conducting manual chart reviews to validate measurements in a subset of the full EHR data -- a form of two-phase sampling. To improve efficiency, phase-two samples are often collected in a biased manner dependent on the patients' initial, error-prone…

含暴露测量误差的灵活高效因果效应估计：控制变量法AI 解读

Exposure measurement error is a ubiquitous but often overlooked challenge in causal inference with observational data. Existing methods accounting for exposure measurement error largely rely on restrictive parametric assumptions, while emerging data-adaptive estimation approaches allow for less restrictive assumptions but at the cost of flexibility, as they are typically tailored towards rigidly-defined statistical quantities. There remains a critical need for…

通过统一半参数双重差分方法估计处理效应AI 解读

Difference-in-differences (DID) approaches are widely used for estimating causal effects with observational data before and after an intervention. DID traditionally estimates the average treatment effect among the treated after making a parallel trends assumption on the means of the outcome. With skewed outcomes, a transformation is often needed; however, the transformation may be difficult to choose, results may be sensitive to the choice, and parallel trends assumptions…

理解错位实施政策的双重差分：Medicaid 与 HIV 的应用AI 解读

While a randomized control trial is considered the gold standard for estimating causal treatment effects, there are many research settings in which randomization is infeasible or unethical. In such cases, researchers rely on analytical methods for observational data to explore causal relationships. Difference-in-differences (DID) is one such method that, most commonly, estimates a difference in some mean outcome in a group before and after the implementation of an…