论文检索

Cox 模型中的亚组处理效应一致性检验AI 解读

An overall treatment effect in a clinical trial may inadequately represent particular patient subgroups, creating uncertainty about whether a population-level efficacy conclusion can legitimately be transferred to them. Conventional interaction tests only investigate whether subgroup-specific treatment effects are exactly equal or not, but cannot detect whether the differences are small enough to be clinically negligible. We develop a formal framework for assessing subgroup…

多区域临床试验中区域处理效应异质性的评估流程AI 解读

Multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) enable efficient global drug development by assessing treatment effects across regions within a single protocol. While powered for overall efficacy, MRCTs are typically not designed to provide confirmatory evidence on regional differences, making an assessment of observed regional heterogeneity largely exploratory and susceptible to sampling variability. Despite this challenge, understanding regional heterogeneity remains important for…

穷尽子组处理效应图中反对同质性的证据评估AI 解读

Exhaustive subgroup treatment effect plots are constructed by displaying all subgroup treatment effects of interest against subgroup sample size, providing a useful overview of the observed treatment effect heterogeneity in a clinical trial. As in any exploratory subgroup analysis, however, the observed estimates suffer from small sample sizes and multiplicity issues. To facilitate more interpretable exploratory assessments, this paper introduces a computationally efficient…

利用个体化处理效应评估处理效应异质性AI 解读

Assessing treatment effect heterogeneity (TEH) in clinical trials is crucial, as it provides insights into the variability of treatment responses among patients, influencing important decisions related to drug development. Furthermore, it can lead to personalized medicine by tailoring treatments to individual patient characteristics. This paper introduces novel methodologies for assessing treatment effects using the individual treatment effect as a basis. To estimate this…

临床试验中的数据驱动子群选择与错误率控制AI 解读

Subgroup selection in clinical trials is essential for identifying patient groups that react differently to a treatment, thereby enabling personalised medicine. In particular, subgroup selection can identify patient groups that respond particularly well to a treatment or that encounter adverse events more often. However, this is a post-selection inference problem, which may pose challenges for traditional techniques used for subgroup analysis, such as increased Type I error…

存在治疗中止的肿瘤随机试验中事件时间结局的因果效应评估AI 解读

In clinical trials, patients may discontinue treatments prematurely, breaking the initial randomization and, thus, challenging inference. Stakeholders in drug development are generally interested in going beyond the Intention-To-Treat (ITT) analysis, which provides valid causal estimates of the effect of treatment assignment but does not inform on the effect of the actual treatment receipt. Our study is motivated by an RCT in oncology, where patients assigned the…