论文检索

成绩测量误差影响处理分配时的倾向得分调整AI 解读

U.S. state education agencies mark schools displaying achievement gaps between demographic subgroups as needing improvement. Some schools may have few students in these subgroups, such that average end-of-year test scores only noisily measure the average "true" score-the score one would expect if students took the test many times. This, in addition to the masking of small subgroup averages in publicly available assessment data, poses challenges for evaluating interventions…

群组规模不等的分层随机试验：稳健设计估计与推断AI 解读

Clustered randomized controlled trials are often stratified or pair-matched to improve covariate balance and efficiency. Sample average treatment effects (SATEs) are commonly estimated by averaging stratum-level treatment-control mean contrasts -- an approach that is natural and widely used. We show that, in stratified clustered trials with heterogeneous cluster sizes, such estimators need not be consistent for the SATE. They can converge to the wrong limit even under…

倾向得分加权中的欠平滑LASSO与合成负对照暴露偏差检测AI 解读

The propensity score (PS) is often used to control for large numbers of covariates in high-dimensional healthcare database studies. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) has become the most widely used tool for fitting large-scale PS models in these settings. LASSO uses L1 regularized regression to prevent overfitting by shrinking coefficients toward zero (setting some exactly to zero). The degree of regularization is typically selected using…

匹配卡尺与指数估计的精度AI 解读

This paper characterizes the precision of index estimation as it carries over into precision of matching. In a model assuming Gaussian covariates and making best-case assumptions about matching quality, it sharply characterizes average and worst-case discrepancies between paired differences of true versus estimated index values. In this optimistic setting, worst-case true and estimated index differences decline to zero if $p=o[n/(\log n)]$, the same restriction on model size…

通过重复测量加权聚合提高检验功效AI 解读

We present an aggregation scheme that increases power in randomized controlled trials and quasi-experiments when the intervention possesses a robust and well-articulated theory of change. Longitudinal data analyzing interventions often include multiple observations on individuals, some of which may be more likely to manifest a treatment effect than others. An intervention's theory of change provides guidance as to which of those observations are best situated to exhibit that…