Are you doing better than random guessing? A call for using negative controls when evaluating causal discovery algorithms
因果发现优于随机猜测吗?评估算法时使用负对照
New proposals for causal discovery algorithms are typically evaluated using simulations and a few selected real data examples with known data generating mechanisms. However, there does not exist a general guideline for how such evaluation studies should be designed, and therefore, comparing results across different studies can be difficult. In this article, we propose to use negative controls as a common evaluation baseline by posing the question: Are we doing better than…