跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:研究直接服务于整群随机试验中处理效应异质性及亚群体因果效应差异的预设检验。

反馈分类问题

A tutorial on conducting sample size and power calculations for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials with linear mixed models

用线性混合模型检测整群随机试验处理效应异质性:样本量与功效教程

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Mary Ryan Baumann
Monica Taljaard
Michael O. Harhay
Guangyu Tong
Rui Wang
Fan Li

用线性混合模型检测整群随机试验处理效应异质性:样本量与功效教程

研究问题
整群随机试验计划检验处理与协变量交互或亚群体效应差异时,如何确定群数和群大小,并考虑比总体平均效应更复杂的设计参数?
方法与思路
作者汇总不同整群随机设计及连续、二元结局下线性混合模型的既有功效和样本量方法,配套 R Shiny 计算器并以真实试验示范。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,教程提供统一参考与在线计算工具,重点讨论结局和协变量的群内相关系数如何影响预先设定的异质性检验功效。
阅读关注点
应核对不同设计和结局对应的公式、交互效应尺度、群内相关参数的设定依据,以及计算器采用的近似与真实试验示范的适用条件。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审及期刊接收未核验。摘要未列出公式、设计参数或计算器验证结果,不能直接据此确定具体试验样本量。

原文摘要

Cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) are a well-established class of designs for evaluating community-based interventions. An essential task in planning these trials is determining the number of clusters and cluster sizes needed to achieve sufficient statistical power for detecting a clinically relevant effect size. While methods for evaluating the average treatment effect (ATE) for the entire study population are well-established, sample size methods for testing heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTEs), i.e., treatment-covariate interaction or difference in subpopulation-specific treatment effects, in CRTs have only recently been developed. For pre-specified analyses of HTEs in CRTs, effect-modifying covariates should, ideally, be accompanied by sample size or power calculations to ensure the trial has adequate power for the planned analyses. Power analysis for testing HTEs is more complex than for ATEs due to the additional design parameters that must be specified. Power and sample size formulas for testing HTEs via linear mixed effects (LME) models have been separately derived for different cluster-randomized designs, including single and multi-period parallel designs, crossover designs, and stepped-wedge designs, and for continuous and binary outcomes. This tutorial provides a consolidated reference guide for these methods and enhances their accessibility through an online R Shiny calculator. We further discuss key considerations for conducting sample size and power calculations to test pre-specified HTE hypotheses in CRTs, highlighting the importance of specifying advanced estimates of intracluster correlation coefficients for both outcomes and covariates, and their implications for power. The sample size methodology and calculator functionality are demonstrated through a real CRT example.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文