Geoadditive Survival Models
地理加性生存模型AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于空间生存分析,地理效应本身不足以归入网络与干扰或其他所列细分方向。
地理加性生存模型AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Survival data often contain small-area geographical or spatial information, such as the residence of individuals. In many cases, the impact of such spatial effects on hazard rates is of considerable substantive interest. Therefore, extensions of known survival or hazard rate models to spatial models have been suggested. Mostly, a spatial component is added to the usual linear predictor of the Cox model. In this article flexible continuous-time geoadditive models are proposed, extending the Cox model with respect to several aspects often needed in applications. The common linear predictor is generalized to an additive predictor, including nonparametric components for the log-baseline hazard, time-varying effects, and possibly nonlinear effects of continuous covariates or further time scales, and a spatial component for geographical effects. In addition, uncorrelated frailty effects or nonlinear two-way interactions can be incorporated. Inference is developed within a unified fully Bayesian framework. Penalized regression splines and Markov random fields are suggested as basic building blocks, and geostatistical (kriging) models are also considered. Posterior analysis uses computationally efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling schemes. Smoothing parameters are an integral part of the model and are estimated automatically. Propriety of posteriors is shown under fairly general conditions, and practical performance is investigated through simulation studies. Our approach is applied to data from a case study in London and Essex that aims to estimate the effect of area of residence and further covariates on waiting times to coronary artery bypass grafting. Results provide clear evidence of nonlinear time-varying effects, and considerable spatial variability of waiting times to bypass grafting.