Testing underidentification in linear models, with applications to dynamic panel and asset pricing models
线性模型的欠识别检验及其动态面板与资产定价应用AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确涉及聚类动态面板 GMM,题名同时标明资产定价应用,分别支持面板数据与资产定价分类。
线性模型的欠识别检验及其动态面板与资产定价应用AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper develops the links between overidentification tests, underidentification tests, score tests and the Cragg and Donald (1993, 1997) and Kleibergen and Paap (2006) rank tests in linear instrumental variable (IV) models. For the structural linear model y=Xβ+u, with the endogenous explanatory variables partitioned as X=x1X2, this general framework shows that standard underidentification tests are tests for overidentification in an auxiliary linear model, x1=X2δ+ɛ, estimated by IV estimation methods using the same instruments as for the original model. This simple structure makes it possible to establish valid robust underidentification tests for linear IV models where these have not been proposed or used before, like clustered dynamic panel data models estimated by GMM. The framework also applies to tests for the rank of general parameter matrices. Invariant rank tests are based on the LIML or continuously updated GMM estimators of both structural and first-stage parameters. This insight leads to the proposal of new two-step invariant asymptotically efficient GMM estimators, and a new iterated GMM estimator that, if it converges, converges to the continuously updated GMM estimator.