Treatment Effects in a Logistic Model Involving the Box-Cox Transformation
含 Box–Cox 变换的 Logistic 模型中的处理效应AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究二元响应 Logistic 模型,并讨论观察性研究或随机试验中的处理效应推断。
含 Box–Cox 变换的 Logistic 模型中的处理效应AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We consider a logistic model for binary response data that allows the possibility of power transformation of x; that is, log[p/(1 - p)] = α + βx (λ) + γI, where x is a continuous variable, x (λ) is the Box–Cox transformation, and I is a binary variable indicating treatment or group. This model is applicable to observational studies or randomized trials when a treatment effect is investigated after controlling for a confounding variable x. Our focus is on inference concerning γ, the treatment effect. In the analysis, a common approach might be to treat the estimated value of λ as fixed and ignore uncertainty associated with its estimation in inference about γ. Alternatively, we might perform an unconditional analysis in which λ is regarded as a parameter. We show that under the null hypothesis, γ = 0, these two approaches are asymptotically equivalent if the two groups have the same distribution of x and the same sample size. This result also holds for the situation of multiple covariates each with their own transformation. Furthermore, we find that when γ ≠ 0 and when there is reasonable overlap between the two distributions of x given I, the two procedures differ asymptotically; however, the difference between them is extremely small. The asymptotic findings are supported by a simulation study.
稀疏依赖下二元配置概率的对抗估计
We consider the problem of estimating binary configuration probabilities, which is common in operations management applications, including product bundling, advertising, etc. Existing approaches typically model each assortment as a category and apply multinomial models to estimate the choice probabilities; while computationally convenient, these methods do not exploit independence structures in the joint distribution and may therefore be statistically inefficient when the…
存在少报的有序选择模型中的变化中的变化
We develop a Difference-in-Differences framework for discrete, ordered outcomes subject to underreporting. Such outcomes commonly arise in self-reported surveys on socially undesirable or stigmatized behaviors, where respondents may conceal their true behavior. For a discrete Changes-in-Changes model that is shown to admit an equivalent threshold-crossing representation, we derive nonparametric bounds for the counterfactual and factual outcome distributions as well as for…
存在低报的有序选择模型中的变化中变化方法
We develop a Difference-in-Differences framework for discrete, ordered outcomes subject to underreporting. Such outcomes commonly arise in self-reported surveys on socially undesirable or stigmatized behaviors, where respondents may conceal their true behavior. For a discrete Changes-in-Changes model that is shown to admit an equivalent threshold-crossing representation, we derive nonparametric bounds for the counterfactual and factual outcome distributions as well as for…
动态处理效应与一般嵌套泛函的自动去偏机器学习
Many canonical models in causal inference and structural econometrics have recursive identification formulas. In causal inference, recursion arises when identification requires both pre- and post-treatment covariates. For example, short-term surrogate outcomes are measured after the treatment, and serve as necessary covariates when identifying long-term effects. Post-treatment covariates are also required for identification of dynamic difference-in-differences designs,…
Abstract We identify the distributional and quantile marginal treatment effect functions when the outcome is right-censored. Our method requires a conditionally exogenous instrument and random censoring. We propose asymptotically consistent semi-parametric estimators and valid inferential procedures for the target functions . To illustrate, we evaluate the effect of alternative sentences (fines and community service vs. no punishment) on recidivism in Brazil. Our results…
智能体经济建模
We introduce Agentic Economic Modeling (AEM), a framework that aligns synthetic LLM choices with small-sample human evidence for econometric inference. AEM first generates task-conditioned synthetic choices via LLMs, then learns a bias-correction mapping from task features and raw LLM choices to human-aligned choices, upon which standard econometric estimators perform inference to recover demand elasticities and treatment effects. We validate AEM in two experiments. In a…