TAIL EXPECTILE ESTIMATION IN THE SEMIPARAMETRIC GENERALIZED PARETO MODEL
半参数广义帕累托模型中的尾部期望分位数估计AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要以重尾损失数据的尾部期望分位数估计与金融收益预测比较为核心，直接对应尾部与系统性风险及分位数与分布效应两个方向。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
半参数广义帕累托模型中的尾部期望分位数估计
- 研究问题
- 摘要称，如何从重尾损失数据中估计尾部期望分位数，尤其是当目标尾部期望分位数超出数据范围时；作者指出此前仅有 Weissman 外推法被研究，而广义帕累托方法及其理论尚属空白。
- 方法与思路
- 作者提出并发展两类半参数广义帕累托估计量的理论：第一类基于直接的非对称最小二乘估计，第二类基于极端分位数估计；方法将位置、尺度与形状等极值参数纳入估计过程以利用尾部观测。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称所提估计量在实值盈亏分布上优于已知最优的 Weissman 型估计量，在非负损失变量上保持竞争力；并在多组金融收益数据上做了预测比较，显示广义帕累托方法的优越性。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对两类估计量的具体构造与识别条件、渐近性质所需的正则假设、超出数据范围外推的适用条件，以及模拟与实证比较的设定、样本与评价标准是否支持摘要所述结论。
- 阅读边界
- 仅凭摘要无法判断估计量的渐近理论细节、有限样本表现、比较是否公平及结论的稳健性；摘要未说明具体数据来源、样本区间与数值结果。
原文摘要
Expectiles have received increasing attention as a market risk measure that is both coherent and elicitable. They are defined as a least squares analog to quantiles. Their estimation from heavy-tailed loss data in an extreme value framework is an important and difficult problem, especially when the target tail expectile is beyond the range of the data. This problem has been studied only fairly recently, using solely the Weissman extrapolation method. The competing generalized Pareto approach, which makes efficient use of tail observations by incorporating the location, scale, and shape extreme value parameters into the estimation procedure, has been left untouched, with a corresponding theory completely lacking. In this article, we challenge the dominance of the Weissman device by presenting and developing the theory of two classes of semiparametric Generalized Pareto estimators: the first class relies on direct asymmetric least squares estimation, while the second is based on extreme quantile estimation. Our estimators are found to outperform the best-known Weissman-type estimators for real-valued profit–loss distributions, while staying competitive for nonnegative loss variables. A forecast comparison exercise is also conducted on various sets of financial returns, showing the superiority of the generalized Pareto approach.