跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究两阶段队列抽样、测量缺失与生存估计,未明确涉及所列经济计量细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Steven D Mark
Hormuzd A Katki

病例测量缺失的两阶段队列研究:生存估计量的设定与实现

研究问题
两阶段队列研究中,部分病例缺少第二阶段暴露测量时,如何估计累积风险、生存及绝对风险,并通过设计提高估计精度?
方法与思路
作者围绕此前推导的非参数与半参数累积风险估计量,说明设计和分析要点,结合胃贲门癌数据及模拟讨论精度差异。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称同类无偏估计量之间存在显著精度差异,并提出利用相关参数的既有知识构造更精确估计量的具体策略。
阅读关注点
应核对病例抽样与测量缺失的区别、无偏性所需条件、精度差异对应的参数,以及只抽取部分病例时的设计权衡。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要提到的无偏性与效率推导来自早先工作,不能据此认定任意缺失机制下均无偏。

原文摘要

Since 1986, we have been studying a cohort of individuals from a region in China with epidemic rates of gastric cardia cancer and have conducted numerous two-stage studies to assess the association of various exposures with this cancer. Two-stage studies are a commonly used statistical design. Stage one involves observing the outcomes and accessible baseline covariate information on all cohort members, and stage two involves using the stage one observations to select a subset of the cohort for measurements of exposures that are difficult to obtain. When the outcomes are censored failure times, such as in our studies, the most common designs used are the case-cohort and nested case-control designs. One limitation of both these designs is that the estimators of the cumulative hazards, and hence survivals and absolute risks, are biased when some cases are missing the stage two measurements. In our experience, such missingness is present in virtually all two-stage studies that (like ours) use biological specimens to obtain exposure measurements. In earlier work we derived and characterized the efficiency of a class of nonparametric and a class of semiparametric cumulative hazard estimators that are unbiased regardless of whether or not all cases are measured. In this article we limit the presentation of the mathematical derivation of these two classes to aspects important to study design and analysis. We analyze data from a two-stage study that we conducted on the association of Helicobacter pylori infection with incident gastric cardia cancers. We discuss the substantive reasons why we deliberately sampled only 25% of the available cancer cases. Through simulations, we demonstrate that substantial variation in precision exists between unbiased estimators within each class, and express the origin of these differences in terms of parameters familiar to investigators. We describe how preexistent knowledge about these parameters can be used to increase estimator precision, and detail specific strategies for constructing such estimators. Computer code in R that implements these estimators is available from the authors on request.

笔记与分组