Regression discontinuity design in perinatal epidemiology and birth cohort research
围产期流行病学与出生队列研究中的断点回归设计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以断点回归这一准实验设计研究干预对后续健康结局的因果效应,直接对应因果推断领域。
围产期流行病学与出生队列研究中的断点回归设计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Regression discontinuity design (RDD) is a quasi-experimental approach to study the causal effects of an intervention/treatment on later health outcomes. It exploits a continuously measured assignment variable with a clearly defined cut-off above or below which the population is at least partially assigned to the intervention/treatment. We describe the RDD and outline the applications of RDD in the context of perinatal epidemiology and birth cohort research. There is an increasing number of studies using RDD in perinatal and pediatric epidemiology. Most of these studies were conducted in the context of education, social and welfare policies, healthcare organization, insurance, and preventive programs. Additional thematic fields include clinically relevant research questions, shock events, social and environmental factors, and changes in guidelines. Maternal and perinatal characteristics, such as age, birth weight and gestational age are frequently used assignment variables to study the effects of the type and intensity of neonatal care, health insurance, and supplemental newborn benefits. Different socioeconomic measures have been used to study the effects of social, welfare and cash transfer programs, while age or date of birth served as assignment variables to study the effects of vaccination programs, pregnancy-specific guidelines, maternity and paternity leave policies and introduction of newborn-based welfare programs. RDD has advantages, including relatively weak and testable assumptions, strong internal validity, intuitive interpretation, and transparent and simple graphical representation. However, its use in birth cohort research is hampered by the rarity of settings outside of policy and program evaluations, low statistical power, limited external validity (geographic- and time-specific settings) and potential contamination by other exposures/interventions.