跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要同时研究汇率时间序列的非线性依赖与样本外金融预测表现。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yongmiao Hong
Tae-Hwy Lee

利用广义谱与非线性时间序列模型推断汇率可预测性

研究问题
汇率变动的序列不相关是否掩盖条件均值的非线性可预测性,这类信息能否改善相对鞅模型的样本外预测?
方法与思路
作者对五种主要货币实施广义谱检验,比较多类线性、非线性及组合预测,并用White现实检验处理数据窥探偏差。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称部分汇率变动虽序列不相关,但条件均值存在非线性;合适的非线性模型及组合在部分货币和评价标准下表现更好。
阅读关注点
应核对广义谱检验针对的原假设、预测样本划分、模型选择与组合方式,以及现实检验如何覆盖被比较的模型集合。
阅读边界
仅据所给摘要;优势仅针对部分货币及评价标准,摘要未说明样本时期、交易成本处理与显著性细节,不能推断普遍可预测。

原文摘要

It is often documented, based on autocorrelation, variance ratio, and power spectrum, that exchange rates approximately follow a martingale process. Because these data check serial uncorrelatedness rather than martingale difference, they may deliver misleading conclusions in favor of the martingale hypothesis when the test statistics are insignificant. In this paper, we explore whether there exists a gap between serial uncorrelatedness and martingale difference for exchange rate changes, and if so, whether nonlinear time series models admissible in the gap can outperform the martingale model in out-of-sample forecasts. Applying the generalized spectral tests of Hong to five major currencies, we find that the changes of exchange rates are often serially uncorrelated, but there exists strong nonlinearity in conditional mean, in addition to the well-known volatility clustering. To forecast the conditional mean, we consider the linear autoregressive, autoregressive polynomial, artificial neural network, and functional-coefficient models, as well as their combination. The functional coefficient model allows the autoregressive coefficients to depend on investment positions via a moving-average technical trading rule. We evaluate out-of-sample forecasts of these models relative to the martingale model, using four criteria-the mean squared forecast error, the mean absolute forecast error, the mean forecast trading return, and the mean correct forecast direction. White's reality check method is used to avoid data-snooping bias. It is found that suitable nonlinear models, particularly in combination, do have superior predictive ability over the martingale model for some currencies in terms of certain forecast evaluation criteria. © 2003 President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文