跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦通用 GMM 与 GEL 检验理论,未指定因果效应、时间序列模型或其他具体领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Eric Renault

GMM 得分检验:为何使用隐含概率?

研究问题
为何不同 GMM 得分检验在偏斜矩条件或弱识别下表现不同,GEL 隐含概率又如何影响检验水平、功效及计算成本?
方法与思路
作者构建涵盖传统 GMM 与 GEL 得分检验的统一框架,分析隐含概率的高阶渐近等价性及其对得分统计量组成部分的估计作用。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称不同 GEL 隐含概率可互换而不改变一阶渐近性质;模拟还支持用隐含概率估计雅可比矩阵和矩条件方差可提升有限样本功效。
阅读关注点
应核对统一框架包含哪些检验、弱识别的具体设定,以及隐含概率等价所需的条件、备择序列和计算替换方式。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,无法判断高阶等价的适用范围或功效改善幅度;一阶渐近不变不保证不同实现的有限样本结果相同。

原文摘要

While simple to implement and thus attractive in practice, the GMM score test of Newey and West (1987) often displays upward size distortion under common scenarios involving skewed moment vectors or models with weak identification. Inference based on the Generalized Empirical Likelihood (GEL) is seen as a general solution to this problem. Kleibergen (2005) and, more generally, Guggenberger and Smith (2005) devised an elegant theory for the GEL score tests. However, strictly speaking, the GEL score tests do not nest the Newey–West score test. Our paper provides a unified framework for score tests in GMM that nests all of the above as special cases and helps us to understand the precise mechanism by which the standard first order asymptotic theory on size and power well approximates the finite sample behavior of some score tests (namely, a subset of the GEL score tests) but not others. Special attention is paid to models with weak identification. We also argue that the apparent computational burden of GEL can be overcome in practice by recognizing the fundamental common role played by the GEL implied probabilities under all special cases of our framework. In particular, we show that all the GEL implied probabilities are asymptotically equivalent at a higher order – both under the null and under appropriate sequences of alternatives – and thus are exchangeable across computationally burdensome (e.g. Empirical Likelihood) and easy (e.g. Euclidean Empirical Likelihood) GEL score tests without affecting the first order asymptotics. Extensive simulation evidence is provided to corroborate our theoretical results. The simulation results also support a simple and yet important insight on the power of the tests: the use of implied probabilities to efficiently estimate the components of the score statistic, namely, the Jacobian and the asymptotic variance of the moment vector, can significantly improve the power of the score test in finite samples.

笔记与分组