Changes-in-Changes for Ordered Choice Models with Underreporting
存在少报的有序选择模型中的变化中的变化AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确结合双重差分、有序离散结果与分位数及分布处理效应,直接对应三个所选方向。
存在少报的有序选择模型中的变化中的变化AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We develop a Difference-in-Differences framework for discrete, ordered outcomes subject to underreporting. Such outcomes commonly arise in self-reported surveys on socially undesirable or stigmatized behaviors, where respondents may conceal their true behavior. For a discrete Changes-in-Changes model that is shown to admit an equivalent threshold-crossing representation, we derive nonparametric bounds for the counterfactual and factual outcome distributions as well as for the associated quantile treatment effects when outcomes are underreported. These bounds are shown to be sharp uniformly across outcome levels under additional support conditions, and we propose suitable estimation and bootstrap inference procedures. In an extension, we also consider a semiparametric underreporting model that allows to point identify and estimate distributional treatment effects. As an application, we investigate the impact of recreational marijuana legalization on the consumption behavior of 8th-grade students in several U.S. states.
存在低报的有序选择模型中的变化中变化方法
We develop a Difference-in-Differences framework for discrete, ordered outcomes subject to underreporting. Such outcomes commonly arise in self-reported surveys on socially undesirable or stigmatized behaviors, where respondents may conceal their true behavior. For a discrete Changes-in-Changes model that is shown to admit an equivalent threshold-crossing representation, we derive nonparametric bounds for the counterfactual and factual outcome distributions as well as for…
Abstract We identify the distributional and quantile marginal treatment effect functions when the outcome is right-censored. Our method requires a conditionally exogenous instrument and random censoring. We propose asymptotically consistent semi-parametric estimators and valid inferential procedures for the target functions . To illustrate, we evaluate the effect of alternative sentences (fines and community service vs. no punishment) on recidivism in Brazil. Our results…
局部稳健的半参数估计
Many economic and causal parameters depend on nonparametric or high dimensional first steps. We give a general construction of locally robust/orthogonal moment functions for GMM, where first steps have no effect, locally, on average moment functions. Using these orthogonal moments reduces model selection and regularization bias, as is important in many applications, especially for machine learning first steps. Also, associated standard errors are robust to misspecification…
Summary This paper provides distribution free tests for detecting sample selection in conditional quantile functions. The first test is an omitted predictor test with the propensity score as the omitted variable. In the case of rejection we cannot distinguish between rejection due to genuine selection or to misspecification. Thus, we suggest a second test using only individuals with propensity score close to one. The latter relies on an ‘identification at infinity’ argument,…
多维不可观测异质性下的处理效应:边际处理效应识别
This paper establishes sufficient conditions for the identification of the marginal treatment effects with multivalued treatments. Our model is based on a multinomial choice model with utility maximization. Our MTE generalizes the MTE defined in Heckman and Vytlacil (2005) in binary treatment models. As in the binary case, we can interpret the MTE as the treatment effect for persons who are indifferent between two treatments at a particular level. Our MTE enables one to…
基于半参数累积概率模型的双重稳健分位数处理效应估计
The causal inference literature has traditionally focused on estimating the mean of the potential outcome, whereas evaluating how a treatment affects the entire outcome distribution can provide additional information in biomedical research. Quantile treatment effect (QTE) captures such distributional differences, particularly when outcomes are skewed. However, existing approaches for estimating QTE make distributional assumptions about the outcome and are thus sensitive to…