Bayesian inference for partial orders from random linear extensions: power relations from 12th Century Royal Acta
由随机线性扩展推断偏序:十二世纪王室文书中的权力关系AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要采用随时间演变的隐马尔可夫模型,并明确与排序模型的时间序列扩展比较,支持时间序列方法分类。
由随机线性扩展推断偏序:十二世纪王室文书中的权力关系AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In the eleventh and twelfth centuries in England, Wales and Normandy, Royal Acta were legal documents in which witnesses were listed in order of social status. Any bishops present were listed as a group. For our purposes, each witness-list is an ordered permutation of bishop names with a known date or date-range. Changes over time in the order bishops are listed may reflect changes in their authority. Historians would like to detect and quantify these changes. There is no reason to assume that the underlying social order which constrains bishop-order within lists is a complete order. We therefore model the evolving social order as an evolving partial ordered set or {\it poset}. We construct a Hidden Markov Model for these data. The hidden state is an evolving poset (the evolving social hierarchy) and the emitted data are random total orders (dated lists) respecting the poset present at the time the order was observed. This generalises existing models for rank-order data such as Mallows and Plackett-Luce. We account for noise via a random ``queue-jumping'' process. Our latent-variable prior for the random process of posets is marginally consistent. A parameter controls poset depth and actor-covariates inform the position of actors in the hierarchy. We fit the model, estimate posets and find evidence for changes in status over time. We interpret our results in terms of court politics. Simpler models, based on Bucket Orders and vertex-series-parallel orders, are rejected. We compare our results with a time-series extension of the Plackett-Luce model. Our software is publicly available.