跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究随机试验中的治疗效应、主层目标量及排除未启动治疗者后的无偏性条件。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Brennan C Kahan
Ian R White
Mark Edwards
Michael O Harhay

将排除未启动治疗者的修正意向治疗分析解释为主层估计

研究问题
试验中排除没有开始所分配治疗的参与者后,修正意向治疗分析究竟估计哪个人群的治疗效应,又在何种条件下无偏?
方法与思路
作者通过主层框架解释该分析,将目标界定为无论分配到哪个治疗组都会启动治疗者的效应,并讨论治疗分配不影响启动的条件。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在治疗分配不影响个体是否启动治疗时,该估计量对上述主层效应无偏,并提出事件可测量与假设合理性两项判断标准。
阅读关注点
应核对无偏性论证及主层定义,区分个体启动状态不受分配影响与组间启动比例相同,并审查盲法和开放标签案例的支持证据。
阅读边界
依据的是 arXiv 预印本摘要,不能确认同行评审或期刊接收;双盲设计本身是否足以支持所需假设,仍须结合具体试验核对。

原文摘要

Background: A common intercurrent event affecting many trials is when some participants do not begin their assigned treatment. Many trials use a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) approach, whereby participants who do not initiate treatment are excluded from the analysis. However, it is not clear the estimand being targeted by such an approach or the assumptions necessary for it to be unbiased. Methods: We demonstrate that a mITT analysis which excludes participants who do not begin treatment is estimating a principal stratum estimand (i.e. the treatment effect in the subpopulation of participants who would begin treatment, regardless of which arm they were assigned to). The mITT estimator is unbiased for the principal stratum estimand under the assumption that the intercurrent event is not affected by the assigned treatment arm, that is, participants who initiate treatment in one arm would also do so in the other arm. Results: We identify two key criteria in determining whether the mITT estimator is likely to be unbiased: first, we must be able to measure the participants in each treatment arm who experience the intercurrent event, and second, the assumption that treatment allocation will not affect whether the participant begins treatment must be reasonable. Most double-blind trials will satisfy these criteria, and we provide an example of an open-label trial where these criteria are likely to be satisfied as well. Conclusions: A modified intention-to-treat analysis which excludes participants who do not begin treatment can be an unbiased estimator for the principal stratum estimand. Our framework can help identify when the assumptions for unbiasedness are likely to hold, and thus whether modified intention-to-treat is appropriate or not.

笔记与分组