跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究高频协波动率、跨资产停滞因子及其与风险溢价的关系。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Xinbing Kong
Bin Wu
Wuyi Ye

高频价格停滞因子与波动率估计

研究问题
跨资产价格停滞如何影响高频协波动率估计,能否利用共同因子恢复停滞概率并修正系统性与特质性成分的偏差?
方法与思路
作者建立含协变量的价格停滞因子模型,以最大似然估计非平稳因子和载荷,再结合局部主成分分析校正协波动率。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称价格停滞导致协波动率向下偏误,提出稳健的校正估计量,并报告风险溢价解释力与样本外组合风险改善。
阅读关注点
应核对维度和采样频率共同增长的条件、停滞与其他市场摩擦的区分,以及不同估计量收敛速度的比较口径。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;稳健性条件、维度依赖及实证改善幅度未完整说明,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

In this article, we propose a price staleness factor model that accounts for pervasive market friction across assets and incorporates relevant covariates. Using large-panel high-frequency data, we derive the maximum likelihood estimators of the regression coefficients, the nonstationary factors, and their loading parameters. These estimators recover the time-varying price staleness probabilities. We develop asymptotic theory in which both the dimension d and the sampling frequency n tend to infinity. Using a local principal component analysis (LPCA) approach, we find that the efficient price co-volatilities (systematic and idiosyncratic) are biased downward due to the presence of staleness. We provide bias-corrected estimators for both the spot and integrated systematic and idiosyncratic co-volatilities, and prove that these estimators are robust to data staleness. Interestingly, besides their dependence on the dimensionality d, the integrated plug-in estimates converge at a rate of n−1/2, whereas the LPCA estimates converge at a slower rate of n−1/4. This validates the aggregation efficiency achieved through nonlinear, nonstationary factor analysis via maximum likelihood estimation. Numerical experiments justify our theoretical findings. Empirically, we demonstrate that the staleness factor provides unique explanatory power for cross-sectional risk premia, and that the staleness correction reduces out-of-sample portfolio risk. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组