跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 6 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 2/6 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 6 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

Inference-Time Alignment for Diffusion Models via Variationally Stable Doob's Matching

基于变分稳定Doob匹配的扩散模型推理时对齐

Inference-time alignment for diffusion models aims to adapt a pre-trained reference diffusion model toward a target distribution without retraining the reference score network, thereby preserving the generative capacity of the reference model while enforcing desired properties at the inference time. A central mechanism for achieving such alignment is guidance, which modifies the sampling dynamics through an additional drift term. In this work, we introduce variationally…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The Promise of Time-Series Foundation Models for Agricultural Forecasting: Evidence from Commodity Prices

时间序列基础模型用于农业预测的潜力:商品价格证据

Forecasting agricultural markets remains challenging due to nonlinear dynamics, structural breaks, and sparse data. A long-standing belief holds that simple time-series methods outperform more advanced alternatives. This paper provides the first systematic evidence that this belief no longer holds with modern time-series foundation models (TSFMs). Using USDA ERS monthly commodity price data from 1997-2025, we evaluate 17 forecasting approaches across four model classes,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Symmetric Random Scan Collapsed Gibbs Sampler for Fully Bayesian Variable Selection with Spike-and-Slab Priors

对称随机扫描坍缩 Gibbs 抽样器:尖峰-平板先验下的全贝叶斯变量选择

We introduce a symmetric random scan Gibbs sampler for scalable Bayesian variable selection that eliminates storage of the full cross-product matrix by computing required quantities on-the-fly. Data-informed proposal weights, constructed from marginal correlations, concentrate sampling effort on promising candidates while a uniform mixing component ensures theoretical validity. We provide explicit guidance for selecting tuning parameters based on the ratio of signal to null…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Censored Graphical Horseshoe: Bayesian sparse precision matrix estimation with censored and missing data

删失图马蹄先验:含删失与缺失数据的贝叶斯稀疏精度矩阵估计

Gaussian graphical models provide a powerful framework for studying conditional dependencies in multivariate data, with widespread applications spanning biomedical, environmental sciences, and other data-rich scientific domains. While the Graphical Horseshoe (GHS) method has emerged as a state-of-the-art Bayesian method for sparse precision matrix estimation, existing approaches assume fully observed data and thus fail in the presence of censoring or missingness, which are…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Sign Accuracy, Mean-Squared Error and the Rate of Zero Crossings: a Generalized Forecast Approach

符号准确率、均方误差与过零频率:一种广义预测方法

Forecasting entails a complex estimation challenge, as it requires balancing multiple, often conflicting, priorities and objectives. Traditional forecast optimization criteria typically focus on a single metric -- such as minimizing the mean squared error (MSE) -- which may overlook other important aspects of predictive performance. In response, we introduce a novel approach called the Smooth Sign Accuracy (SSA) framework, which simultaneously considers sign accuracy, MSE,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

Predictive inference for time series: why is split conformal effective despite temporal dependence?

时间序列预测推断:时间依赖下拆分共形预测为何仍然有效?

We consider the problem of uncertainty quantification for prediction in a time series: if we use past data to forecast the next time point, can we provide valid prediction intervals around our forecasts? To avoid placing distributional assumptions on the data, in recent years the conformal prediction method has been a popular approach for predictive inference, since it provides distribution-free coverage for any iid or exchangeable data distribution. However, in the time…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓