跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 15 篇 · 到月 11 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
26 篇论文
导出

Penalized Network Cross-Validation for Nested Models by Edge-Sampling

基于边抽样的嵌套网络模型惩罚交叉验证

In the network literature, a wide range of statistical models has been proposed to exploit structural patterns in the data. Therefore, model selection between different models is a fundamental problem. However, systematic theoretical understanding remains limited when comparisons involve different model classes. To address this challenging issue, we propose a penalized edge-sampling cross-validation framework for nested network model selection. By incorporating a model…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Geometric Model Averaging

几何模型平均

This paper proposes a geometric model averaging (GMA) method in the framework of general likelihood estimation. Instead of using the classical weighted arithmetic mean, we consider a weighted geometric mean of the conditional probability density functions estimated from different candidate models, allowing both parameter uncertainty and model misspecification. The optimal weight is the minimizer of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence of the true density to the weighted…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Additive-Effect Assisted Learning

加性效应辅助学习

Abstract It is quite popular nowadays for researchers and data analysts holding different datasets to seek assistance from each other to enhance their modelling performance. We consider a scenario where different learners hold datasets with potentially distinct variables, and their observations can be aligned by a nonprivate identifier. Their collaboration faces the following difficulties: first, learners may need to keep data values or even variable names undisclosed due…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Minimax rates of convergence for nonparametric location-Scale models

非参数位置—尺度模型的极小极大收敛速率

This paper studies minimax rates of convergence for nonparametric location-scale models, which include mean, quantile, expectile and momentile regression settings. Under Hellinger differentiability on the error distribution and other mild conditions, we show that the minimax rate of convergence for estimating the regression function under the squared L2 loss is determined by the metric entropy of the nonparametric function class. Different error distributions, including…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

AVERAGING ESTIMATORS OF HETEROGENEOUS TREATMENT EFFECTS UNDER ADDITIVE MODELS

加性模型下异质处理效应估计量的模型平均

We consider spline-based additive models for estimation of conditional treatment effects. To handle the uncertainty due to variable selection, we propose a method of model averaging with weights obtained by minimizing a J -fold cross-validation criterion, in which a nearest neighbor matching is used to approximate the unobserved potential outcomes. We show that the proposed method is asymptotically optimal in the sense of achieving the lowest possible squared loss in some…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

On Optimality of Mallows Model Averaging

Mallows 模型平均的最优性

In the past decades, model averaging (MA) has attracted much attention as it has emerged as an alternative tool to the model selection (MS) statistical approach. Hansen introduced a Mallows model averaging (MMA) method with model weights selected by minimizing a Mallows’ Cp criterion. The main theoretical justification for MMA is an asymptotic optimality (AOP), which states that the risk/loss of the resulting MA estimator is asymptotically equivalent to that of the best but…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Is a Classification Procedure Good Enough?—A Goodness-of-Fit Assessment Tool for Classification Learning

分类程序是否充分拟合:分类学习的拟合优度评估

In recent years, many nontraditional classification methods, such as random forest, boosting, and neural network, have been widely used in applications. Their performance is typically measured in terms of classification accuracy. While the classification error rate and the like are important, they do not address a fundamental question: Is the classification method underfitted? To our best knowledge, there is no existing method that can assess the goodness of fit of a general…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

On improvability of model selection by model averaging

模型平均能否改进模型选择?

In regression, model averaging (MA) provides an alternative to model selection (MS), and asymptotic efficiency theories have been derived for both MS and MA. Basically, under sensible conditions, MS asymptotically achieves the smallest estimation loss/risk among the candidate models, and MA does so among averaged estimators from the models with convex weights. Clearly, MA can beat MS by any extent in rate of convergence when all the candidate models have large biases that…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

COMBINING ESTIMATES OF CONDITIONAL TREATMENT EFFECTS

条件处理效应估计的组合

Estimating a treatment’s effect on an outcome conditional on covariates is a primary goal of many empirical investigations. Accurate estimation of the treatment effect given covariates can enable the optimal treatment to be applied to each unit or guide the deployment of limited treatment resources for maximum program benefit. Applications of conditional treatment effect estimation are found in direct marketing, economic policy, and personalized medicine. When estimating…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Sparsity Oriented Importance Learning for High-Dimensional Linear Regression

高维线性回归中面向稀疏性的变量重要性学习

With now well-recognized nonnegligible model selection uncertainty, data analysts should no longer be satisfied with the output of a single final model from a model selection process, regardless of its sophistication. To improve reliability and reproducibility in model choice, one constructive approach is to make good use of a sound variable importance measure. Although interesting importance measures are available and increasingly used in data analysis, little theoretical…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Cross-validation for selecting a model selection procedure

用交叉验证选择模型选择程序

While there are various model selection methods, an unanswered but important question is how to select one of them for data at hand. The difficulty is due to that the targeted behaviors of the model selection procedures depend heavily on uncheckable or difficult-to-check assumptions on the data generating process. Fortunately, cross-validation (CV) provides a general tool to solve this problem. In this work, results are provided on how to apply CV to consistently choose the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Model Selection for Estimating Treatment Effects

面向处理效应估计的模型选择

Summary Researchers often believe that a treatment's effect on a response may be heterogeneous with respect to certain baseline covariates. This is an important premise of personalized medicine. Several methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects have been proposed. However, little attention has been given to the problem of choosing between estimators of treatment effects. Models that best estimate the regression function may not be best for estimating the effect…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Robust forecast combinations

稳健预测组合

Forecast outliers commonly occur in economic, financial, and other areas of forecasting applications. In the literature of forecast combinations, there have been only a few studies exploring how to deal with outliers. In this work, we propose two robust combining methods based on the AFTER algorithm (Yang, 2004a). Our approach utilizes robust loss functions in order to reduce the influence of outliers. Oracle inequalities for certain versions of these methods are obtained,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Parametric or nonparametric? A parametricness index for model selection

参数还是非参数?模型选择的参数性指数

In model selection literature, two classes of criteria perform well asymptotically in different situations: Bayesian information criterion (BIC) (as a representative) is consistent in selection when the true model is finite dimensional (parametric scenario); Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) performs well in an asymptotic efficiency when the true model is infinite dimensional (nonparametric scenario). But there is little work that addresses if it is possible and how to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Maximum Lq-likelihood estimation

最大 Lq 似然估计

In this paper, the maximum Lq-likelihood estimator (MLqE), a new parameter estimator based on nonextensive entropy [Kibernetika 3 (1967) 30–35] is introduced. The properties of the MLqE are studied via asymptotic analysis and computer simulations. The behavior of the MLqE is characterized by the degree of distortion q applied to the assumed model. When q is properly chosen for small and moderate sample sizes, the MLqE can successfully trade bias for precision, resulting in a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

LOCALIZED MODEL SELECTION FOR REGRESSION

回归中的局部化模型选择

Research on model/procedure selection has focused on selecting a single model globally. In many applications, especially for high-dimensional or complex data, however, the relative performance of the candidate procedures typically depends on the location, and the globally best procedure can often be improved when selection of a model is allowed to depend on location. We consider localized model selection methods and derive their theoretical properties.This research was…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Consistency of cross validation for comparing regression procedures

比较回归方法时交叉验证的一致性

Theoretical developments on cross validation (CV) have mainly focused on selecting one among a list of finite-dimensional models (e.g., subset or order selection in linear regression) or selecting a smoothing parameter (e.g., bandwidth for kernel smoothing). However, little is known about consistency of cross validation when applied to compare between parametric and nonparametric methods or within nonparametric methods. We show that under some conditions, with an appropriate…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

PREDICTION/ESTIMATION WITH SIMPLE LINEAR MODELS: IS IT REALLY THAT SIMPLE?

简单线性模型的预测与估计:真的如此简单吗?

Consider the simple normal linear regression model for estimation/prediction at a new design point. When the slope parameter is not obviously nonzero, hypothesis testing and information criteria can be used for identifying the right model. We compare the performances of such methods both theoretically and empirically from different perspectives for more insight. The testing approach at the conventional size of 0.05, in spite of being the “standard approach,” performs poorly…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Can the strengths of AIC and BIC be shared? A conflict between model indentification and regression estimation

能否兼得 AIC 与 BIC 的优势?模型识别与回归估计的冲突

A traditional approach to statistical inference is to identify the true or best model first with little or no consideration of the specific goal of inference in the model identification stage. Can the pursuit of the true model also lead to optimal regression estimation? In model selection, it is well known that BIC is consistent in selecting the true model, and AIC is minimax-rate optimal for estimating the regression function. A recent promising direction is adaptive model…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Combining Linear Regression Models

线性回归模型的组合

Model-combining (i.e., mixing) methods have been proposed in recent years to deal with uncertainty in model selection. Even though advantages of model combining over model selection have been demonstrated in simulations and data examples, it is still unclear to a large extent when model combining should be preferred. In this work, first we propose an instability measure to capture the uncertainty of model selection in estimation, called perturbation instability in estimation…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

COMBINING FORECASTING PROCEDURES: SOME THEORETICAL RESULTS

预测方法组合的若干理论结果

We study some methods of combining procedures for forecasting a continuous random variable. Statistical risk bounds under the square error loss are obtained under distributional assumptions on the future given the current outside information and the past observations. The risk bounds show that the combined forecast automatically achieves the best performance among the candidate procedures up to a constant factor and an additive penalty term. In terms of the rate of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Randomized Allocation with nonparametric estimation for a multi-armed bandit problem with covariates

含协变量多臂老虎机问题的非参数估计与随机分配

We study a multi-armed bandit problem in a setting where covariates are available. We take a nonparametric approach to estimate the functional relationship between the response (reward) and the covariates. The estimated relationships and appropriate randomization are used to select a good arm to play for a greater expected reward. Randomization helps balance the tendency to trust the currently most promising arm with further exploration of other arms. It is shown that, with…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Adaptive Regression by Mixing

通过混合实现自适应回归

Adaptation over different procedures is of practical importance. Different procedures perform well under different conditions. In many practical situations, it is rather hard to assess which conditions are (approximately) satisfied so as to identify the best procedure for the data at hand. Thus automatic adaptation over various scenarios is desirable. A practically feasible method, named adaptive regression by mixing (ARM), is proposed to convexly combine general candidate…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓