跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及可获得的 JEL 分类核验相关性。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 5 篇 · 到月 4 篇 · 到年 1 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按首次收录时间汇总。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
10 篇论文
导出

On the efficiency of highly stratified experiments

高度分层实验的估计效率

This paper studies the use of highly stratified designs for the efficient estimation of a large class of treatment effect parameters that arise in the analysis of experiments. By a “highly stratified” design, we mean experiments in which units are divided into blocks of a fixed size and a proportion within each block is assigned to a binary treatment uniformly at random. The class of parameters considered are those that can be expressed as the solution to a set of moment…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

On the Identifying Power of Generalized Monotonicity for Average Treatment Effects

广义单调性对平均处理效应的识别力

In the context of a binary outcome, treatment, and instrument, Balke and Pearl establish that the monotonicity condition of Imbens and Angrist has no identifying power beyond instrument exogeneity for average potential outcomes and average treatment effects in the sense that adding it to instrument exogeneity does not decrease the identified sets for those parameters whenever those restrictions are consistent with the distribution of the observable data. This article shows…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference in Experiments with Matched Pairs and Imperfect Compliance

配对实验中不完全依从下的推断

This article studies inference for the local average treatment effect in randomized controlled trials with imperfect compliance where treatment status is determined according to “matched pairs.” By “matched pairs,” we mean that units are sampled iid from the population of interest, paired according to observed, baseline covariates and finally, within each pair, one unit is selected at random for treatment. Under weak assumptions governing the quality of the pairings, we…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference in cluster randomized trials with matched pairs

配对整群随机试验中的统计推断

This paper studies inference in cluster randomized trials where treatment status is determined according to a “matched pairs” design. Here, by a cluster randomized experiment, we mean one in which treatment is assigned at the level of the cluster; by a “matched pairs” design, we mean that a sample of clusters is paired according to baseline, cluster-level covariates and, within each pair, one cluster is selected at random for treatment. We study the large-sample behavior of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Covariate adjustment in experiments with matched pairs

配对随机实验中的协变量调整

This paper studies inference for the average treatment effect (ATE) in experiments in which treatment status is determined according to “matched pairs” and it is additionally desired to adjust for observed, baseline covariates to gain further precision. By a “matched pairs” design, we mean that units are sampled i.i.d. from the population of interest, paired according to observed, baseline covariates, and finally, within each pair, one unit is selected at random for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Revisiting the analysis of matched‐pair and stratified experiments in the presence of attrition

存在样本流失时的配对与分层实验分析再审视

Abstract In this paper, we revisit some common recommendations regarding the analysis of matched‐pair and stratified experimental designs in the presence of attrition. Our main objective is to clarify a number of well‐known claims about the practice of dropping pairs with an attrited unit when analyzing matched‐pair designs. Contradictory advice appears in the literature about whether or not dropping pairs is beneficial or harmful, and stratifying into larger groups has been…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference for matched tuples and fully blocked factorial designs

匹配元组与完全分块析因设计的推断

This paper studies inference in randomized controlled trials with multiple treatments, where treatment status is determined according to a “matched tuples” design. If there are | D | possible treatments, then by a matched tuples design, we mean an experimental design where units are sampled i.i.d. from the population of interest, grouped into “homogeneous” blocks of size | D | , and finally, within each block, exactly one individual is randomly assigned to each of the | D |…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Why randomize? Minimax optimality under permutation invariance

为什么要随机化?置换不变性下的极小极大最优性

This paper studies finite sample minimax optimal randomization schemes and estimation schemes in estimating parameters including the average treatment effect, when treatment effects are heterogeneous. A randomization scheme is a distribution over a group of permutations of a given treatment assignment vector. An estimation scheme is a joint distribution over assignment vectors, linear estimators, and permutations of assignment vectors. The key element in the minimax problem…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference in Experiments With Matched Pairs

配对随机实验中的推断

This article studies inference for the average treatment effect in randomized controlled trials where treatment status is determined according to a “matched pairs” design. By a “matched pairs” design, we mean that units are sampled iid from the population of interest, paired according to observed, baseline covariates and finally, within each pair, one unit is selected at random for treatment. This type of design is used routinely throughout the sciences, but fundamental…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Two-Step Method for Testing Many Moment Inequalities

检验大量矩不等式的两步方法

This article considers the problem of testing a finite number of moment inequalities. For this problem, Romano, Shaikh, and Wolf proposed a two-step testing procedure. In the first step, the procedure incorporates information about the location of moments using a confidence region. In the second step, the procedure accounts for the use of the confidence region in the first step by adjusting the significance level of the test appropriately. Its justification, however, has so…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓