跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 5 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
5 篇论文
导出

How to Compare Copula Forecasts?

如何比较 Copula 预测?

This paper lays out a principled approach to compare copula forecasts via strictly consistent scores. We first establish the negative result that, in general, copulas fail to be elicitable, implying that copula predictions alone do not allow for meaningful comparisons. A notable exception is on Fréchet classes, that is, when the marginals are given and identical across all elements of the class, in which case we give suitable scores for the copula forecast comparison. As a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Backtesting Systemic Risk Forecasts Using Multi-Objective Elicitability

利用多目标可诱导性回测系统性风险预测

Systemic risk measures such as CoVaR, CoES, and MES are widely-used in finance, macroeconomics and by regulatory bodies. Despite their importance, we show that they fail to be elicitable and identifiable. This renders forecast comparison and validation, commonly summarized as “backtesting,” impossible. The novel notion of multi-objective elicitability solves this problem by relying on bivariate scores equipped with the lexicographic order. Based on this concept, we propose…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Characterizing M -estimators

M估计量的刻画

Summary We characterize the full classes of M-estimators for semiparametric models of general functionals by formally connecting the theory of consistent loss functions from forecast evaluation with the theory of M-estimation. This novel characterization result allows us to leverage existing results on loss functions known from the literature on forecast evaluation in estimation theory. We exemplify advantageous implications for the fields of robust, efficient, equivariant…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Correction note: Higher order elicitability and Osband’s principle

更正说明:高阶可引出性与 Osband 原理

A pair of errors regarding Proposition 3.4 and Theorem 5.2(ii) of Fissler and Ziegel (2016) have been noted. Corrections to them along with comments on imprecisions in two other results, Propositions 4.2 and 4.4 in the same article, are provided in the online supplement Fissler and Ziegel (2020).

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Higher order elicitability and Osband’s principle

高阶可引出性与 Osband 原理

A statistical functional, such as the mean or the median, is called elicitable if there is a scoring function or loss function such that the correct forecast of the functional is the unique minimizer of the expected score. Such scoring functions are called strictly consistent for the functional. The elicitability of a functional opens the possibility to compare competing forecasts and to rank them in terms of their realized scores. In this paper, we explore the notion of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓