跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 0 篇 · 到月 8 篇 · 到年 1 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
9 篇论文
导出

Tests of Linear and Logarithmic Transformations for Integrated Processes

单整过程的线性与对数变换检验

This article proposes nonnested tests of linear and logarithmic transformations of integrated processes against each other, where the innovations of both series follow autoregressive processes. It is shown that the null distributions of the test statistics for both the linear and logarithmic transformations are nonstandard when the processes have no drift, whereas they are asymptotically normal when the processes have positive drift. Monte Carlo experiments and illustrative…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Tests of Linear and Logarithmic Transformations for Integrated Processes

单整过程的线性与对数变换检验

This article proposes nonnested tests of linear and logarithmic transformations of integrated processes against each other, where the innovations of both series follow autoregressive processes. It is shown that the null distributions of the test statistics for both the linear and logarithmic transformations are nonstandard when the processes have no drift, whereas they are asymptotically normal when the processes have positive drift. Monte Carlo experiments and illustrative…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

ANALYTICAL POWER COMPARISONS OF NESTED AND NONNESTED TESTS FOR LINEAR AND LOGLINEAR REGRESSION MODELS

线性与对数线性回归中嵌套及非嵌套检验的解析功效比较

This paper compares several tests for linear and loglinear regression models where both the dependent and independent variables are transformed. It is shown that the Lagrange multiplier test proposed by Godfrey and Wickens (1981, Review of Economic Studies 48, 487–496) in the framework of the Box–Cox regression model has the highest asymptotic power of the compared tests. The extended projection test of MacKinnon, White, and Davidson (1983, Journal of Econometrics 11,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Power of Tests for Nonlinear Transformation in Regression Analysis

回归分析中非线性变换检验的功效

This paper compares the local power of tests for a nonlinear transformation of the dependent variable in a regression model against the alternative hypothesis of a linear transformation. It is shown that the local power of the Cox test is higher than those of the extended projection test of MacKinnon, White, and Davidson, and Bera and McAleer's test. The theoretical result is supported by a Monte-Carlo experiment in testing for a regression model with a logarithmically…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Bounds Test for Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regression Models Under Heteroscedasticity

异方差下两个线性回归模型系数相等的界限检验

This article proposes a small sample bounds test for equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions with unequal disturbance variances. The probability that our test is inconclusive is given under the null hypothesis. It is also shown that our test is more powerful than the Jayatissa test when the regression coefficients differ substantially.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Bounds Test of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions When Disturbance Variances are Unequal

扰动方差不等时两组线性回归系数相等性的界限检验

This article considers the Wald test statistic for testing equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions when the disturbance variances are unequal. It is shown that the distribution of the test statistic under the null hypothesis is bounded, asymptotically up to the second order, by the distributions of two F variates multiplied by the number of the regressors.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Comparison of Efficiencies of Several Estimators for Linear Regressions with Autocorrelated Errors

一阶自相关误差下线性回归估计量的效率比较

This article compares several estimators for linear regression models with first-order autocorrelated errors. Asymptotic variances of the estimators of regression coefficients are obtained up to order T −2 for the maximum likelihood, the iterated Prais-Winsten, and the iterated Cochrane—Orcutt methods. It is shown that the first two methods are equivalent in efficiency and that the last is less efficient. This loss in efficiency is due to the effect of the initial…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓