跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 2 篇 · 到月 6 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
8 篇论文
导出

Stepwise Confidence Intervals without Multiplicity Adjustment for Dose—Response and Toxicity Studies

剂量反应与毒性研究中无需多重性调整的逐步置信区间

Not all simultaneous inferences need multiplicity adjustment. If the sequence of individual inferences is predefined, and failure to achieve the desired inference at any step renders subsequent inferences unnecessary, then multiplicity adjustment is not needed. This can be justified using the closed testing principle to test appropriate hypotheses that are nested in sequence, starting with the most restrictive one. But what hypotheses are appropriate may not be obvious in…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

On the Relationship between Stepwise Decision Procedures and Confidence Sets

逐步决策程序与置信集的关系

This article considers the relationship between two standard methods of inference on a set of A: unknown parameters, namely stepwise decision procedures and the construction of simultaneous confidence intervals. Illustrative examples with k = 2 are discussed for one-sided step-down and step-up decision procedures and for a two-sided step-down decision procedure. For these examples with normal distributional assumptions, a set of confidence intervals associated with the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

On the Relationship Between Stepwise Decision Procedures and Confidence Sets

逐步决策程序与置信集之间的关系

This article considers the relationship between two standard methods of inference on a set of A: unknown parameters, namely stepwise decision procedures and the construction of simultaneous confidence intervals. Illustrative examples with k = 2 are discussed for one-sided step-down and step-up decision procedures and for a two-sided step-down decision procedure. For these examples with normal distributional assumptions, a set of confidence intervals associated with the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Confidence Intervals Associated with Tests for Bioequivalence

与生物等效性检验相关的置信区间

Previously, the connection between bioequivalence tests and their associated confidence intervals was not well understood. In fact, the α-level two one-sided tests approach was thought to be associated with a 1−2α confidence interval. In this paper, we build up connections which allow us to construct 1−α confidence intervals from α-level tests and vice versa. When applied to the α-level two one-sided tests, the resultant 1−-α confidence intervals are properly contained in…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Constrained Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Multiple Comparisons with the Best

与最佳者多重比较的约束同时置信区间

For comparing $k$ treatment effects $\theta_1, \theta_2, \cdots \theta_k$, often the parameters of primary interest are $\theta_i - \max_{j\neq i}\theta_j, i = 1, \cdots, k$. In this article, we develop constrained $100P^\ast{\tt\%}$ two-sided simultaneous confidence intervals for $\theta_i - \max_{j \neq i} \theta_j$ which we refer to as (constrained) MCB intervals. It turns out that the lower bounds of the intervals imply Indifference Zone selection inference, and the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Simultaneous Inference with Respect to the Best Treatment in Block Designs

区组设计中相对于最佳处理的同时推断

In many practical situations, only inference concerning the unknown best treatment and comparisons of the individual treatments with respect to the best treatment are of primary interest. We give an explicit formulation of this problem in the framework of randomized complete block designs. A procedure based on sample means and two procedures based on signed ranks are proposed. It is seen that, for the problem considered, these procedures have a substantial advantage over…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for all Distances from the "Best"

所有对象相对“最优者”差距的同时置信区间

In practice, comparisons with the "best" are often the ones of primary interest. In this paper, parametric and nonparametric simultaneous upper confidence intervals for all distances from the "best" are derived under the location model. Their improvement upon the results of Bechhofer (1954), Gupta (1956, 1965), Fabian (1962), and Desu (1970) in the parametric case is discussed. In the nonparametric case, no comparable confidence statements were available previously.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓