跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 4 篇 · 到月 33 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
37 篇论文
导出

Testing for the appropriate level of clustering in linear regression models

线性回归中适当聚类层级的检验

The overwhelming majority of empirical research that uses cluster-robust inference assumes that the clustering structure is known, even though there are often several possible ways in which a dataset could be clustered. We propose two tests for the correct level of clustering in regression models. One test focuses on inference about a single coefficient, and the other on inference about two or more coefficients. We provide both asymptotic and wild bootstrap implementations.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Using large samples in econometrics

计量经济学中的大样本使用

As I demonstrate using evidence from a journal data repository that I manage, the datasets used in empirical work are getting larger. When we use very large datasets, it can be dangerous to rely on standard methods for statistical inference. In addition, we need to worry about computational issues. We must be careful in our choice of statistical methods and the algorithms used to implement them.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Fast and reliable jackknife and bootstrap methods for cluster‐robust inference

快速可靠的聚类稳健刀切与自助推断方法

Summary We provide computationally attractive methods to obtain jackknife‐based cluster‐robust variance matrix estimators (CRVEs) for linear regression models estimated by least squares. We also propose several new variants of the wild cluster bootstrap, which involve these CRVEs, jackknife‐based bootstrap data‐generating processes, or both. Extensive simulation experiments suggest that the new methods can provide much more reliable inferences than existing ones in cases…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Cluster-robust inference: A guide to empirical practice

聚类稳健推断:实证实践指南

Methods for cluster-robust inference are routinely used in economics and many other disciplines. However, it is only recently that theoretical foundations for the use of these methods in many empirically relevant situations have been developed. In this paper, we use these theoretical results to provide a guide to empirical practice. We do not attempt to present a comprehensive survey of the (very large) literature. Instead, we bridge theory and practice by providing a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Wild Bootstrap and Asymptotic Inference With Multiway Clustering

多维聚类下的野生自助法与渐近推断

We study two cluster-robust variance estimators (CRVEs) for regression models with clustering in two dimensions and give conditions under which t-statistics based on each of them yield asymptotically valid inferences. In particular, one of the CRVEs requires stronger assumptions about the nature of the intra-cluster correlations. We then propose several wild bootstrap procedures and state conditions under which they are asymptotically valid for each type of t-statistic.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Randomization inference for difference-in-differences with few treated clusters

少量处理簇下双重差分的随机化推断

Inference using difference-in-differences with clustered data requires care. Previous research has shown that, when there are few treated clusters, t-tests based on cluster-robust variance estimators (CRVEs) severely overreject, and different variants of the wild cluster bootstrap can either overreject or underreject dramatically. We study two randomization inference (RI) procedures. A procedure based on estimated coefficients may be unreliable when clusters are…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Asymptotic theory and wild bootstrap inference with clustered errors

聚类误差下的渐近理论与野生自助推断

We study inference based on cluster-robust variance estimators for regression models with clustered errors, focusing on the wild cluster bootstrap. We state conditions under which asymptotic and bootstrap tests and confidence intervals are asymptotically valid. These conditions put limits on the rates at which the cluster sizes can increase as the number of clusters tends to infinity. We also derive Edgeworth expansions for the asymptotic and bootstrap test statistics.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters

处理簇很少时的野生自助法

Inference based on cluster‐robust standard errors in linear regression models, using either the Student's t‐distribution or the wild cluster bootstrap, is known to fail when the number of treated clusters is very small. We propose a family of new procedures called the subcluster wild bootstrap, which includes the ordinary wild bootstrap as a limiting case. In the case of pure treatment models, where all observations within clusters are either treated or not, the latter…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Wild Bootstrap Inference for Wildly Different Cluster Sizes

聚类规模悬殊时的野生自助法推断

Summary The cluster robust variance estimator (CRVE) relies on the number of clusters being sufficiently large. Monte Carlo evidence suggests that the ‘rule of 42’ is not true for unbalanced clusters. Rejection frequencies are higher for datasets with 50 clusters proportional to US state populations than with 50 balanced clusters. Using critical values based on the wild cluster bootstrap performs much better. However, this procedure fails when a small number of clusters is…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Confidence sets based on inverting Anderson–Rubin tests

反演Anderson–Rubin检验构造的置信集

Economists are often interested in the coefficient of a single endogenous explanatory variable in a linear simultaneous‐equations model. One way to obtain a confidence set for this coefficient is to invert the Anderson–Rubin (AR) test. The AR confidence sets that result have correct coverage under classical assumptions. However, AR confidence sets also have many undesirable properties. It is well known that they can be unbounded when the instruments are weak, as is true of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

NUMERICAL DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS OF FRACTIONAL UNIT ROOT AND COINTEGRATION TESTS

分数阶单位根与协整检验的数值分布函数

SUMMARY We calculate, by simulations, numerical asymptotic distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for fractional unit roots and cointegration rank. Because these distributions depend on a real‐valued parameter b which must be estimated, simple tabulation is not feasible. Partly owing to the presence of this parameter, the choice of model specification for the response surface regressions used to obtain the numerical distribution functions is more involved than is…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Wild Bootstrap Tests for IV Regression

工具变量回归的野生自助法检验

We propose a wild bootstrap procedure for linear regression models estimated by instrumental variables. Like other bootstrap procedures that we proposed elsewhere, it uses efficient estimates of the reduced-form equation(s). Unlike the earlier procedures, it takes account of possible heteroscedasticity of unknown form. We apply this procedure to t tests, including heteroscedasticity-robust t tests, and to the Anderson–Rubin test. We provide simulation evidence that it works…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bootstrap inference in a linear equation estimated by instrumental variables

工具变量线性方程中的 Bootstrap 推断

We study several tests for the coefficient of the single right-hand-side endogenous variable in a linear equation estimated by instrumental variables. We show that writing all the test statistics--Student's t, Anderson--Rubin, the LM statistic of Kleibergen and Moreira (K), and likelihood ratio (LR)--as functions of six random quantities leads to a number of interesting results about the properties of the tests under weak-instrument asymptotics. We then propose several new…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Moments of IV and JIVE estimators

IV 与 JIVE 估计量的矩

We develop a method based on the use of polar coordinates to investigate the existence of moments for instrumental variables and related estimators in the linear regression model. For generalized IV estimators, we obtain familiar results. For JIVE, we obtain the new result that this estimator has no moments at all. Simulation results illustrate the consequences of its lack of moments. Copyright Royal Economic Society 2007

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Reply to Ackerberg and Devereux and Blomquist and Dahlberg on ‘The case against JIVE’

就《反对使用 JIVE 的论证》答复 Ackerberg、Devereux、Blomquist 与 Dahlberg

The JAE Data Archive directory is available at http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/jae/datasets/ . Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The case against JIVE

反对使用 JIVE 的论证

Abstract We perform an extensive series of Monte Carlo experiments to compare the performance of two variants of the ‘jackknife instrumental variables estimator’, or JIVE, with that of the more familiar 2SLS and LIML estimators. We find no evidence to suggest that JIVE should ever be used. It is always more dispersed than 2SLS, often very much so, and it is almost always inferior to LIML in all respects. Interestingly, JIVE seems to perform particularly badly when the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Distributions of error correction tests for cointegration

协整误差修正检验的分布

This paper provides densities and finite sample critical values for the single-equation error correction statistic for testing cointegration. Graphs and response surfaces summarize extensive Monte Carlo simulations and highlight simple dependencies of the statistic's quantiles on the number of variables in the error correction model, the choice of deterministic components, and the sample size. The response surfaces provide a convenient way for calculating finite sample…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration

协整似然比检验的数值分布函数

This paper employs response surface regressions based on simulation experiments to calculate asymptotic distribution functions for the Johansen-type likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. These are carried out in the context of the models recently proposed by Pesaran, Shin, and Smith (1997) that allow for the possibility of exogenous variables integrated of order one. The paper calculates critical values that are very much more accurate than those available previously.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

THE SIZE DISTORTION OF BOOTSTRAP TESTS

Bootstrap 检验的检验水平失真

We provide a theoretical framework in which to study the accuracy of bootstrap P values, which may be based on a parametric or nonparametric bootstrap. In the parametric case, the accuracy of a bootstrap test will depend on the shape of what we call the critical value function. We show that, in many circumstances, the error in rejection probability of a bootstrap test will be one whole order of magnitude smaller than that of the corresponding asymptotic test. We also propose…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests

单位根与协整检验的数值分布函数

This paper employs response surface regressions based on simulation experiments to calculate distribution functions for some well-known unit root and cointegration test statistics. The principal contributions of the paper are a set of data files that contain estimated response surface coefficients and a computer program for utilizing them. This program, which is freely available via the Internet, can easily be used to calculate both asymptotic and finite-sample critical…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimation and Inference in Econometrics.

计量经济学中的估计与推断

Davidson and MacKinnon have written an outstanding textbook for graduates in econometrics, covering both basic and advanced topics and using geometrical proofs throughout for clarity of exposition. The book offers a unified theoretical perspective, and emphasizes the practical applications of modern theory.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓