论文检索

用双参数敏感性分析整合随机与非随机研究AI 解读

Abstract Causal inference is vital for informed decision-making across fields such as biomedical research and social sciences. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for internal validity of inferences, whereas observational studies (OSs) often provide the opportunity for greater external validity. However, both data sources have inherent limitations preventing their use for broadly valid statistical inferences: RCTs may lack generalizability…

随机试验中 Rosenbaum 秩估计量的稳健性与效率：设计视角AI 解读

Summary Mean-based estimators of causal effects in randomized experiments may behave poorly if the potential outcomes have a heavy tail or contain outliers. An alternative estimator proposed by Rosenbaum (1993) estimates a constant additive treatment effect by inverting a randomization test using ranks. We develop a design-based asymptotic theory for this rank-based estimator and study its robustness and efficiency properties. We show that Rosenbaum’s estimator is robust…

潜在序贯可忽略性假设与处理不依从下的数字沟通策略因果效应推断AI 解读

Organizations are increasingly relying on digital communications, such as targeted e-mails and mobile notifications, to engage with their audiences. Despite the evident advantages like cost-effectiveness and customization, assessing the effectiveness of such communications from observational data poses various statistical challenges. An immediate challenge is to adjust for targeting rules used in these communications. When digital communications involve a sequence of e-mails…

实验设计分块的近似算法AI 解读

Abstract Blocked randomized designs are used to improve the precision of treatment effect estimates compared to a completely randomized design. A block is a set of units that are relatively homogeneous and consequently would tend to produce relatively similar outcomes if the treatment had no effect. The problem of finding the optimal blocking of the units into equal sized blocks of any given size larger than two is known to be a difficult problem—there is no polynomial time…

利用多个可能无效的工具变量构造证据因子AI 解读

Valid instrumental variables enable treatment effect inference even when selection into treatment is biased by unobserved confounders. When multiple candidate instruments are available, but some of them are possibly invalid, the previously proposed reinforced design enables one or more nearly independent valid analyses that depend on very different assumptions. That is, we can perform evidence factor analysis. However, the validity of the reinforced design depends crucially…