跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 82 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/10 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 82 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期修订

Model-assisted inference for dynamic causal effects in staggered rollout cluster randomized experiments

分期推广集群随机实验中动态因果效应的模型辅助推断

Staggered rollout cluster randomized experiments (SR-CREs) involve sequential treatment adoption across clusters, requiring analysis methods that address a general class of dynamic causal effects, anticipation, and non-ignorable cluster-period sizes. Without imposing any outcome modeling assumptions, we study regression estimators using individual data, cluster-period averages, and scaled cluster-period totals, with and without covariate adjustment from a design-based…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Data-driven controlled subgroup selection in clinical trials

临床试验中的数据驱动子群选择与错误率控制

Subgroup selection in clinical trials is essential for identifying patient groups that react differently to a treatment, thereby enabling personalised medicine. In particular, subgroup selection can identify patient groups that respond particularly well to a treatment or that encounter adverse events more often. However, this is a post-selection inference problem, which may pose challenges for traditional techniques used for subgroup analysis, such as increased Type I error…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Hybrid Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

估计异质性处理效应的混合元学习器

Estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE) from observational data involves modeling decisions that differ from supervised learning, particularly concerning how to regularize model complexity. Previous approaches can be grouped into two primary "meta-learner" paradigms that impose distinct inductive biases. Indirect meta-learners first fit and regularize separate potential outcome (PO) models and then estimate CATE by taking their difference, whereas direct…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Synthetic Regressing Control

合成回归控制法

Estimating weights in the synthetic control method, typically resulting in sparse weights where only a few control units have non-zero weights, involves an optimization procedure that selects and combines control units to closely match the treated unit. However, it is not uncommon for the linear combination of pre-treatment period outcomes for the control units, using nonnegative weights with the constraint that their sum equals one, to inadequately approximate the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Comparing regularisation paths of (conjugate) gradient estimators in ridge regression

岭回归中(共轭)梯度估计量的正则化路径比较

We consider standard gradient descent, gradient flow and conjugate gradients as iterative algorithms for minimising a penalised ridge criterion in linear regression. While it is well known that conjugate gradients exhibit fast numerical convergence, the statistical properties of their iterates are more difficult to assess due to inherent non-linearities and dependencies. On the other hand, standard gradient flow is a linear method with well-known regularising properties when…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Incremental effects for continuous exposures

连续暴露的增量效应

Causal inference problems often involve continuous treatments, such as dose, duration, or frequency. However, identifying and estimating standard dose-response estimands requires that everyone has some chance of receiving any level of the exposure (i.e., positivity). To avoid this assumption, we consider stochastic interventions based on exponentially tilting the treatment distribution by some parameter $δ$ (an incremental effect); this increases or decreases the likelihood…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Powering RCTs for marginal effects with GLMs using prognostic score adjustment

用预后评分调整提升广义线性模型随机试验边际效应分析的功效

In randomized clinical trials (RCTs), the accurate estimation of marginal treatment effects is crucial for determining the efficacy of interventions. Enhancing the statistical power of these analyses is a key objective for statisticians. The increasing availability of historical data from registries, prior trials, and health records presents an opportunity to improve trial efficiency. However, many methods for historical borrowing compromise strict type-I error rate control.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Testing Information Ordering for Strategic Agents

策略行为主体的信息排序检验

Specifying the information structure in strategic environments is difficult for empirical researchers. We develop a test of information ordering that examines whether the true information structure is at least as informative as a proposed baseline. Using Bayes Correlated Equilibrium (BCE), we translate the ordering of information structures into testable moment inequalities and establish uniform asymptotic validity for our testing procedure. In an application to U.S. airline…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Two-Phase Treatment with Noncompliance: Identifying the Cumulative Average Treatment Effect via Multisite Instrumental Variables

存在不依从的两阶段处理:用多地点工具变量识别累积平均效应

When evaluating a two-phase intervention, the cumulative average treatment effect (ATE) is often the primary causal estimand of interest. However, some individuals who do not respond well to the Phase I treatment may subsequently display noncompliant behaviors. At the same time, exposure to the Phase I treatment is expected to directly influence an individual's potential outcomes, thereby violating the exclusion restriction. Building on an instrumental variable (IV) strategy…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Direct Bias-Correction Term Estimation for Average Treatment Effect Estimation

平均处理效应估计中偏差校正项的直接估计

This study considers the estimation of the direct bias-correction term for estimating the average treatment effect (ATE). Let $\{(X_i, D_i, Y_i)\}_{i=1}^{n}$ be the observations, where $X_i$ denotes $K$-dimensional covariates, $D_i \in \{0, 1\}$ denotes a binary treatment assignment indicator, and $Y_i$ denotes an outcome. In ATE estimation, $h_0(D_i, X_i) = \frac{1[D_i = 1]}{e_0(X_i)} - \frac{1[D_i = 0]}{1 - e_0(X_i)}$ is called the bias-correction term, where $e_0(X_i)$ is…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓