跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 35 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/11 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 35 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期修订

Calibrated sensitivity models

校准敏感性模型

In causal inference, sensitivity models assess how unmeasured confounders could alter causal analyses, but the sensitivity parameter -- which quantifies the degree of unmeasured confounding -- is often difficult to interpret. For this reason, researchers sometimes compare the sensitivity parameter to an estimate of measured confounding. This is known as calibration, or benchmarking. However, calibrated estimates are not always interpreted correctly, and uncertainty in the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Confounder selection via iterative graph expansion

通过迭代扩展因果图选择混杂变量

Confounder selection, namely choosing a set of covariates to control for confounding between a treatment and an outcome, is arguably the most important step in the design of an observational study. Previous methods, such as Pearl's back-door criterion, typically require pre-specifying a causal graph, which can often be difficult in practice. We propose an interactive procedure for confounder selection that does not require pre-specifying the graph or the set of observed…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Sharp Bounds on the Variance of General Regression Adjustment in Randomized Experiments

随机实验中一般回归调整的方差锐界

A growing statistical literature focuses on causal inference in the context of experiments where the target of inference is the average treatment effect in a finite population and random assignment determines which subjects are allocated to one of the experimental conditions. In this framework, variances of average treatment effect estimators remain unidentified because they depend on the covariance between treated and untreated potential outcomes, which are never jointly…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Heterogeneous Treatment Effects via Linear Dynamic Panel Data Models

线性动态面板模型中的异质性处理效应

We study the identification of heterogeneous, intertemporal treatment effects (TE) when potential outcomes depend on past treatments. First, applying a dynamic panel data model to observed outcomes, we show that an instrumental variable (IV) version of the estimand in Arellano and Bond (1991) recovers a non-convex (negatively weighted) aggregate of TE plus non-vanishing trends. We then provide conditions on sequential exchangeability (SE) of treatment and on TE heterogeneity…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Specification testing with grouped fixed effects

利用分组固定效应进行模型设定检验

We propose a Hausman test for the correct specification of unobserved heterogeneity in both linear and nonlinear fixed-effects panel data models. The null hypothesis is that heterogeneity is either time-invariant or, symmetrically, described by homogeneous time effects. We contrast the standard one-way fixed-effects estimator with the recently developed two-way grouped fixed-effects estimator, that is consistent in the presence of time-varying heterogeneity (or heterogeneous…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Statistical Inference for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect with Right-censored Data from Synthesizing Randomized Clinical Trials and Real-world Data

融合随机试验与真实世界右删失数据的异质处理效应推断

The heterogeneous treatment effect plays a crucial role in precision medicine.There is evidence that real-world data, even subject to biases, can be employed as supplementary evidence for randomized clinical trials to improve the statistical efficiency of the heterogeneous treatment effect estimation. In this paper, for survival data with right censoring, we consider estimating the heterogeneous treatment effect, defined as the difference of the treatment-specific…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Distal Causal Excursion Effects: Modeling Long-Term Effects of Time-Varying Treatments in Micro-Randomized Trials

远期因果偏离效应:微随机试验中时变处理的长期效应建模

Micro-randomized trials (MRTs) play a crucial role in optimizing digital interventions. In an MRT, each participant is sequentially randomized among treatment options hundreds of times. While the interventions tested in MRTs target short-term behavioral responses (proximal outcomes), their ultimate goal is to drive long-term behavior change (distal outcomes). However, existing causal inference methods, such as the causal excursion effect, are limited to proximal outcomes,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Consumer Welfare Under Individual Heterogeneity

个体异质性下的消费者福利

We propose a nonparametric method for estimating the distribution of consumer welfare from cross-sectional data with no restrictions on individual preferences. First demonstrating that moments of demand identify the curvature of the expenditure function, we use these moments to approximate money-metric welfare measures. Our approach captures both nonhomotheticity and heterogeneity in preferences in the behavioral responses to price changes. We apply our method to US…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Nonparametric estimation of the Patient Weighted While-Alive Estimand

患者加权存活期间估计目标的非参数估计

In clinical trials with recurrent events, such as repeated hospitalizations terminating with death, it is important to consider the patient events overall history for a thorough assessment of treatment effects. The occurrence of fewer events due to early deaths can lead to misinterpretation, emphasizing the importance of a while-alive strategy as suggested in Schmidli et al. (2023). In this study, we focus on the patient weighted while-alive estimand, represented as the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Design-Based and Network Sampling-Based Uncertainties in Network Experiments

网络实验中的设计不确定性与网络抽样不确定性

Ordinary least squares (OLS) estimators are widely used in network experiments to estimate spillover effects. We study the causal interpretation of, and inference for the OLS estimator under both design-based uncertainty from random treatment assignment and sampling-based uncertainty in network links. We show that correlations among regressors that capture the exposure to neighbors' treatments can induce contamination bias, preventing OLS from aggregating heterogeneous…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Normalizations and misspecification in skill formation models

技能形成模型中的规范化与误设

An important class of structural models studies the determinants of skill formation and the optimal timing of interventions. In this paper, I provide new identification results for these models and investigate the effects of seemingly innocuous scale and location restrictions on parameters of interest. To do so, I first characterize the identified set of all parameters without these additional restrictions and show that important policy-relevant parameters are point…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓