每日简报

用随机矩阵理论重新考察多工具变量问题AI 解读

Instrumental variables estimation with many instruments is biased. Traditional bias-adjustments are closely connected to the Silverstein equation. Based on the theory of random matrices, we show that Ridge estimation of the first-stage parameters reduces the implicit price of bias-adjustments. This leads to a trade-off, allowing for less costly estimation of the causal effect, which comes along with improved asymptotic properties. Our theoretical results nest existing ones…

不完全区组设计的设计本位因果推断AI 解读

Researchers often turn to block randomization to increase the precision of their inference or due to practical considerations, such as in multisite trials. However, if the number of treatments under consideration is large it might not be feasible or practical to assign all treatments within each block. We develop novel inference results under the finite-population design-based framework for natural alternatives to the complete block design that do not require reducing the…

基于汇总数据消除赢家诅咒的稳健孟德尔随机化AI 解读

In the past decade, the increased availability of genome-wide association studies summary data has popularized Mendelian Randomization (MR) for conducting causal inference. MR analyses, incorporating genetic variants as instrumental variables, are known for their robustness against reverse causation bias and unmeasured confounders. Nevertheless, classical MR analyses utilizing summary data may still produce biased causal effect estimates due to the winner's curse and…

内生暴露与轻尾误差下的因果效应识别和推断AI 解读

Endogeneity poses significant challenges in causal inference across various research domains. This paper proposes a novel approach to identify and estimate causal effects in the presence of endogeneity. We consider a structural equation with endogenous exposures and an additive error term. Assuming the light-tailedness of the error term, we show that the causal effect can be identified by contrasting extreme conditional quantiles of the outcome given the exposures. Unlike…

去偏且具有半参数效率的变化中变化估计量AI 解读

We present a novel extension of the influential changes-in-changes (CiC) framework of Athey and Imbens (2006) for estimating the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) and distributional causal effects in panel data with unmeasured confounding. While CiC relaxes the parallel trends assumption in difference-in-differences (DiD), existing methods typically assume a scalar unobserved confounder and monotonic outcome relationships, and lack inference tools that…