跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 68 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/20 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

2 个来源同步延迟

本期 68 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期修订

New possibilities in identification of binary choice models with fixed effects

固定效应二元选择模型识别的新可能

We study the identification of binary choice models with fixed effects. We propose a condition called sign saturation and show that this condition is sufficient for identifying the model. In particular, this condition can guarantee identification even when all the regressors are bounded, including multiple discrete regressors. We also establish that without this condition, the model is not identified unless the error distribution belongs to a special class. Moreover, we show…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A New Fit Assessment Framework for Common Factor Models Using Generalized Residuals

利用广义残差评估共同因子模型拟合的新框架

Assessing fit in common factor models solely through the lens of mean and covariance structures, as is commonly done with conventional goodness-of-fit (GOF) assessments, may overlook critical aspects of misfit, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. To achieve more flexible fit assessment, we extend the theory of generalized residuals (Haberman & Sinharay, 2013), originally developed for models with categorical data, to encompass more general measurement models.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Adaptive Experimental Design for Policy Learning

用于政策学习的自适应实验设计

This study investigates the contextual best arm identification (BAI) problem, aiming to design an adaptive experiment to identify the best treatment arm conditioned on contextual information (covariates). We consider a decision-maker who assigns treatment arms to experimental units during an experiment and recommends the estimated best treatment arm based on the contexts at the end of the experiment. The decision-maker uses a policy for recommendations, which is a function…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

FedECA: Federated External Control Arms for Causal Inference with Time-To-Event Data in Distributed Settings

FedECA:分布式生存数据因果推断的联邦外部对照组

External control arms can inform early clinical development of experimental drugs and provide efficacy evidence for regulatory approval. However, accessing sufficient real-world or historical clinical trials data is challenging. Indeed, regulations protecting patients' rights by strictly controlling data processing make pooling data from multiple sources in a central server often difficult. To address these limitations, we develop a method that leverages federated learning…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Decision Theory for Treatment Choice Problems with Partial Identification

部分识别下处理选择问题的决策理论

We apply classical statistical decision theory to a large class of treatment choice problems with partial identification. We show that, in a general class of problems with Gaussian likelihood, all decision rules are admissible; it is maximin-welfare optimal to ignore all data; and, for severe enough partial identification, there are infinitely many minimax-regret optimal decision rules, all of which sometimes randomize the policy recommendation. We uniquely characterize the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Structural restrictions in local causal discovery: identifying direct causes of a target variable

局部因果发现中的结构限制:识别目标变量的直接原因

We consider the problem of learning a set of direct causes of a target variable from an observational joint distribution. Learning directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) that represent the causal structure is a fundamental problem in science. Several results are known when the full DAG is identifiable from the distribution, such as assuming a nonlinear Gaussian data-generating process. Here, we are only interested in identifying the direct causes of one target variable (local causal…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Generalized Random Forests using Fixed-Point Trees

使用不动点树的广义随机森林

We propose a computationally efficient alternative to generalized random forests (GRFs) for estimating heterogeneous effects in large dimensions. While GRFs rely on a gradient-based splitting criterion, which in large dimensions is computationally expensive and unstable, our method introduces a fixed-point approximation that eliminates the need for Jacobian estimation. This gradient-free approach preserves GRF's theoretical guarantees of consistency and asymptotic normality…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Revealed Information

显示的信息

An analyst observes the frequency with which a decision maker (DM) takes actions, but not the frequency conditional on payoff-relevant states. We ask when the analyst can rationalize the DM's choices as if the DM first learns something about the state before acting. We provide a support-function characterization of the triples of utility functions, prior beliefs, and (marginal) distributions over actions such that the DM's action distribution is consistent with information…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Identification of dynamic treatment effects when treatment histories are partially observed

处理历史部分可观测时动态处理效应的识别

This paper presents a general difference-in-differences framework for identifying path-dependent treatment effects when treatment histories are partially observed. We introduce a novel robust estimator that adjusts for missing histories using a combination of outcome, propensity score, and missing treatment models. We show that this approach identifies the target parameter as long as \textit{any two} of the three models are correctly specified. The method delivers improved…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Testing Goodness-of-Fit for Conditional Distributions: A New Perspective based on Principal Component Analysis

条件分布拟合优度检验:基于主成分分析的新视角

This paper introduces a novel goodness-of-fit test technique for parametric conditional distributions. The proposed tests are based on a residual marked empirical process, for which we develop a conditional Principal Component Analysis. The obtained components provide a basis for various types of new tests in addition to the omnibus one. Component tests that based on each component serve as experts in detecting certain directions. Smooth tests that assemble a few components…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate?

从时间序列学习的动力系统何时具有统计准确性?

Conventional notions of generalization often fail to describe the ability of learned models to capture meaningful information from dynamical data. A neural network that learns complex dynamics with a small test error may still fail to reproduce its \emph{physical} behavior, including associated statistical moments and Lyapunov exponents. To address this gap, we propose an ergodic theoretic approach to generalization of complex dynamical models learned from time series data.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Quantile Treatment Effects in High Dimensional Panel Data

高维面板数据中的分位数处理效应

We introduce novel estimators for quantile causal effects with high dimensional panel data (large $N$ and $T$), where only one or a few units are affected by the intervention or policy. Our method extends the generalized synthetic control method \citep{xu_2017} from average treatment effects on the treated to quantile treatment effects on the treated, allowing the underlying factor structure to change across the quantile of the interested outcome distribution. Our method…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Fast computation of exact confidence intervals for randomized experiments with binary outcomes

二元结果随机实验精确置信区间的快速计算

Given a randomized experiment with binary outcomes, exact confidence intervals for the average causal effect of the treatment can be computed through a series of permutation tests. This approach requires minimal assumptions and is valid for all sample sizes, as it does not rely on large-sample approximations such as those implied by the central limit theorem. We show that these confidence intervals can be found in $O(n \log n)$ permutation tests in the case of balanced…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Identifiable and interpretable nonparametric factor analysis

可识别且可解释的非参数因子分析

Factor models are widely used to reduce dimensionality in modeling high-dimensional data. However, there remains a need for models that can be reliably fit in modest sample sizes and are identifiable, interpretable, and flexible. To address this gap, we propose a NIFTY model that uses a linear factor structure with Gaussian residuals, but with a novel latent variable modeling structure. In particular, we model each latent variable as a one-dimensional nonlinear mapping of a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Unified Principal Components Analysis for Stationary Functional Time Series

平稳函数型时间序列的统一主成分分析

Functional time series (FTS) data have become increasingly available in real-world applications. Research on such data typically focuses on two objectives: curve reconstruction and forecasting, both of which require efficient dimension reduction. While functional principal component analysis (FPCA) serves as a standard tool, existing methods often fail to achieve simultaneous parsimony and optimality in dimension reduction, thereby restricting their practical implementation.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Difference-in-Differences Designs: A Practitioner's Guide

双重差分设计:实务指南

Difference-in-differences (DiD) is arguably the most popular quasi-experimental research design. Its canonical form, with two groups and two periods, is well-understood. However, empirical practices can be ad hoc when researchers go beyond that simple case. This article provides an organizing framework for discussing different types of DiD designs and their associated DiD estimators. It discusses covariates, weights, handling multiple periods, and staggered treatments. The…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

KANITE: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for ITE estimation

KANITE:用于个体处理效应估计的 Kolmogorov–Arnold 网络

We introduce KANITE, a framework leveraging Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) for Individual Treatment Effect (ITE) estimation under multiple treatments setting in causal inference. By utilizing KAN's unique abilities to learn univariate activation functions as opposed to learning linear weights by Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs), we improve the estimates of ITEs. The KANITE framework comprises two key architectures: 1.Integral Probability Metric (IPM) architecture: This…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Impulse Response Analysis of Structural Nonlinear Time Series Models

结构非线性时间序列模型的脉冲响应分析

This paper proposes a semiparametric sieve approach to estimate impulse response functions of nonlinear time series within a general class of structural autoregressive models. We prove that a two-step procedure can flexibly accommodate nonlinear specifications while avoiding the need to choose fixed parametric forms. Sieve impulse responses are proven to be consistent by deriving uniform estimation guarantees, and an iterative algorithm makes it straightforward to compute…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Statistical Learning for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: Pretraining, Prognosis, and Prediction

异质性处理效应的统计学习:预训练、预后与预测

Robust estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects is a fundamental challenge for optimal decision-making in domains ranging from personalized medicine to educational policy. In recent years, predictive machine learning has emerged as a valuable toolbox for causal estimation, enabling more flexible effect estimation. However, accurately estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE) remains a major challenge, particularly in the presence of many covariates. In…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating treatment effects with a unified semi-parametric difference-in-differences approach

通过统一半参数双重差分方法估计处理效应

Difference-in-differences (DID) approaches are widely used for estimating causal effects with observational data before and after an intervention. DID traditionally estimates the average treatment effect among the treated after making a parallel trends assumption on the means of the outcome. With skewed outcomes, a transformation is often needed; however, the transformation may be difficult to choose, results may be sensitive to the choice, and parallel trends assumptions…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓