跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 66 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 1/18 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 66 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期修订

Sharp Bounds for Continuous-Valued Treatment Effects with Unobserved Confounders

存在未观测混杂时连续处理效应的锐界

In causal inference, treatment effects are typically estimated under the ignorability, or unconfoundedness, assumption, which is often unrealistic in observational data. By relaxing this assumption and conducting a sensitivity analysis, we introduce novel bounds and derive confidence intervals for the Average Potential Outcome (APO) - a standard metric for evaluating continuous-valued treatment or exposure effects. We demonstrate that these bounds are sharp under a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The Landscape of Causal Discovery Data: Grounding Causal Discovery in Real-World Applications

因果发现数据的全景:立足真实应用的因果发现

Causal discovery aims to automatically uncover causal relationships from data, a capability with significant potential across many scientific disciplines. However, its real-world applications remain limited. Current methods often rely on unrealistic assumptions and are evaluated only on simple synthetic toy datasets, often with inadequate evaluation metrics. In this paper, we substantiate these claims by performing a systematic review of the recent causal discovery…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference for an Algorithmic Fairness-Accuracy Frontier

算法公平性与准确性前沿的统计推断

Algorithms are increasingly used to aid with high-stakes decision making. Yet, their predictive ability frequently exhibits systematic variation across population subgroups. To assess the trade-off between fairness and accuracy using finite data, we propose a debiased machine learning estimator for the fairness-accuracy frontier introduced by Liang, Lu, Mu, and Okumura (2024). We derive its asymptotic distribution and propose inference methods to test key hypotheses in the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bayesian inference for dynamic spatial quantile models with interactive effects

含交互效应的动态空间分位数模型的贝叶斯推断

With the rapid advancement of information technology and data collection systems, large-scale spatial panel data presents new methodological and computational challenges. This paper introduces a dynamic spatial panel quantile model that incorporates unobserved heterogeneity. The proposed model captures the dynamic structure of panel data, high-dimensional cross-sectional dependence, and allows for heterogeneous regression coefficients. To estimate the model, we propose a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Design-Based Uncertainty for Quasi-Experiments

准实验的设计型不确定性

Design-based frameworks of uncertainty are frequently used in settings where the treatment is (conditionally) randomly assigned. This paper develops a design-based framework suitable for analyzing quasi-experimental settings in the social sciences, in which the treatment assignment can be viewed as the realization of some stochastic process but there is concern about unobserved selection into treatment. In our framework, treatments are stochastic, but units may differ in…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Using Forests in Multivariate Regression Discontinuity Designs

多评分断点回归设计中的森林方法

We discuss estimation and inference of conditional treatment effects in regression discontinuity (RD) designs with multiple scores. In addition to local linear regressions and the minimax-optimal estimator more recently proposed by Imbens and Wager (2019), we argue that two variants of random forests, honest regression forests and local linear forests, should be added to the toolkit of applied researchers working with multivariate RD designs; their validity follows from…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Learning from Double Positive and Unlabeled Data for Potential-Customer Identification

利用双重正例与未标记数据学习识别潜在客户

In this study, we propose a method for identifying potential customers in targeted marketing by applying learning from positive and unlabeled data (PU learning). We consider a scenario in which a company sells a product and can observe only the customers who purchased it. Decision-makers seek to market products effectively based on whether people have loyalty to the company. Individuals with loyalty are those who are likely to remain interested in the company even without…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Forests for Differences: Robust Causal Inference Beyond Parametric DiD

用于双重差分的森林:超越参数模型的因果推断

This paper introduces the Difference-in-Differences Bayesian Causal Forest (DiD-BCF), a novel non-parametric model addressing key challenges in DiD estimation, such as staggered adoption and heterogeneous treatment effects. DiD-BCF provides a unified framework for estimating Average (ATE), Group-Average (GATE), and Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATE). A core innovation, its Parallel Trends Assumption (PTA)-based reparameterization, enhances estimation accuracy and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Randomization-Based Method for Evaluating Time-Varying Treatment Effects

评价时变处理效应的随机化方法

Tests for paired censored outcomes have been extensively studied, with some justified in the context of randomization-based inference. These tests are primarily designed to detect an overall treatment effect across the entire follow-up period, providing limited insight into when the effect manifests and how it changes over time. In this article, we introduce new randomization-based tests for paired censored outcomes that enable both time-specific and long-term analysis of a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity Models

利用因果速度模型区分原因与结果

Bivariate structural causal models (SCM) are often used to infer causal direction by examining their goodness-of-fit under restricted model classes. In this paper, we describe a parametrization of bivariate SCMs in terms of a causal velocity by viewing the cause variable as time in a dynamical system. The velocity implicitly defines counterfactual curves via the solution of initial value problems where the observation specifies the initial condition. Using tools from measure…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Statistical Inference for Cumulative INAR($\infty$) Processes via Least-Squares

累计无限阶整数值自回归过程的最小二乘统计推断

This paper investigates the cumulative Integer-Valued Autoregressive model of infinite order, denoted as INAR($\infty$), a class of processes crucial for modeling count time series and equivalent to discrete-time Hawkes processes. We propose a computationally efficient conditional least-squares (CLS) estimator to address the challenge of parameter inference in this infinite-dimensional setting. We establish the key theoretical properties of the estimator, including its…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Efficiency of QMLE for dynamic panel data models with interactive effects

含交互效应动态面板模型的准极大似然估计效率

This paper studies the problem of efficient estimation of panel data models in the presence of an increasing number of incidental parameters. We formulate the dynamic panel as a simultaneous equations system, and derive the efficiency bound under the normality assumption. We then show that the Gaussian quasi-maximum likelihood estimator (QMLE) applied to the system achieves the normality efficiency bound without the normality assumption. Comparison of QMLE with the fixed…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Conditional Triple Difference-in-Differences

条件三重差分法

Triple difference-in-differences designs are widely used to estimate causal effects in empirical work. Surveying the literature, we find that most applications include controls. We show that this standard practice is generally biased for the target causal estimand when covariate distributions differ across groups. To address this, we propose identifying a causal estimand by fixing the covariate distribution to that of one group. We then develop a double-robust estimator and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Are you doing better than random guessing? A call for using negative controls when evaluating causal discovery algorithms

因果发现优于随机猜测吗?评估算法时使用负对照

New proposals for causal discovery algorithms are typically evaluated using simulations and a few selected real data examples with known data generating mechanisms. However, there does not exist a general guideline for how such evaluation studies should be designed, and therefore, comparing results across different studies can be difficult. In this article, we propose to use negative controls as a common evaluation baseline by posing the question: Are we doing better than…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Testing Generalizability in Causal Inference

因果推断中的泛化能力检验

Ensuring robust model performance in diverse real-world scenarios requires addressing generalizability across domains with covariate shifts. However, no formal procedure exists for statistically evaluating generalizability in machine learning algorithms. Existing predictive metrics like mean squared error (MSE) help to quantify the relative performance between models, but do not directly answer whether a model can or cannot generalize. To address this gap in the domain of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

CATE Estimation With Potential Outcome Imputation From Local Regression

基于局部回归潜在结果插补的条件平均处理效应估计

One of the most significant challenges in Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) estimation is the statistical discrepancy between distinct treatment groups. To address this issue, we propose a model-agnostic data augmentation method for CATE estimation. First, we derive regret bounds for general data augmentation methods suggesting that a small imputation error may be necessary for accurate CATE estimation. Inspired by this idea, we propose a contrastive learning…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Quantifying Treatment Effects: Estimating Risk Ratios in Causal Inference

量化处理效应:因果推断中的风险比估计

Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) are the current gold standards to empirically measure the effect of a new drug. However, they may be of limited size and resorting to complementary non-randomized data, referred to as observational, is promising, as additional sources of evidence. In both RCT and observational data, the Risk Difference (RD) is often used to characterize the effect of a drug. Additionally, medical guidelines recommend to also report the Risk Ratio (RR),…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Fisher's Randomization Test for Causality with General Types of Treatments

适用于一般处理类型的 Fisher 因果随机化检验

We extend Fisher's randomization test (FRT) to test conditional independence between observed outcomes and treatments given covariates in both randomized experiments and observational studies, with no restriction on the variable type of treatments. Under a generalized unconfoundedness assumption, we provide causal identification for this hypothesis. Our approach requires neither the no-interference nor the positive overlap assumption, making it a widely applicable tool for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓