跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 38 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 1/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

Journal of the American Statistical Association 同步延迟 · 上次成功10月15日

本期 38 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

TabPFN: One Model to Rule Them All?

TabPFN:一个模型能否包办所有任务?

Hollmann et al. (Nature 637 (2025) 319-326) recently introduced TabPFN, a transformer-based deep learning model for regression and classification on tabular data, which they claim "outperforms all previous methods on datasets with up to 10,000 samples by a wide margin, using substantially less training time." Furthermore, they have called TabPFN a "foundation model" for tabular data, as it can support "data generation, density estimation, learning reusable embeddings and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Covariate-Adjusted Deep Causal Learning for Heterogeneous Panel Data Models

异质性面板模型的协变量调整深度因果学习

This paper studies the task of estimating heterogeneous treatment effects in causal panel data models, in the presence of covariate effects. We propose a novel Covariate-Adjusted Deep Causal Learning (CoDEAL) for panel data models, that employs flexible model structures and powerful neural network architectures to cohesively deal with the underlying heterogeneity and nonlinearity of both panel units and covariate effects. The proposed CoDEAL integrates nonlinear covariate…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Debiased Ill-Posed Regression

去偏的病态回归估计

In various statistical settings, the goal is to estimate a function which is restricted by the statistical model only through a conditional moment restriction. Prominent examples include the nonparametric instrumental variable framework for estimating the structural function of the outcome variable, and the proximal causal inference framework for estimating the bridge functions. A common strategy in the literature is to find the minimizer of the projected mean squared error.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bayesian Dynamic Clustering Factor Models

贝叶斯动态聚类因子模型

We propose novel Bayesian Dynamic Clustering Factor Models (BDCFM) for the analysis of multivariate longitudinal data. BDCFM combines factor models with hidden Markov models to concomitantly perform dimension reduction, clustering, and estimation of the dynamic transitions of subjects through clusters. We develop an efficient Gibbs sampler for exploration of the posterior distribution. An analysis of a simulated dataset shows that our inferential approach works well both at…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Synthetic Business Cycle Approach to Counterfactual Analysis with Nonstationary Macroeconomic Data

非平稳宏观数据反事实分析的合成经济周期方法

This paper investigates the use of synthetic control methods for causal inference in macroeconomic settings when dealing with possibly nonstationary data. While the synthetic control approach has gained popularity for estimating counterfactual outcomes, we caution researchers against assuming a common nonstationary trend factor across units for macroeconomic outcomes, as doing so may result in misleading causal estimation-a pitfall we refer to as the spurious synthetic…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Uncovering Bias Mechanisms in Observational Studies

揭示观测研究中的偏差机制

Observational studies are a key resource for causal inference but are often affected by systematic biases. Prior work has focused mainly on detecting these biases, via sensitivity analyses and comparisons with randomized controlled trials, or mitigating them through debiasing techniques. However, there remains a lack of methodology for uncovering the underlying mechanisms driving these biases, e.g., whether due to hidden confounding or selection of participants. In this…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Recover Experimental Data with Selection Bias using Counterfactual Logic

用反事实逻辑恢复存在选择偏差的实验数据

Selection bias, arising from the systematic inclusion or exclusion of certain samples, poses a significant challenge to the validity of causal inference. While Bareinboim et al. introduced methods for recovering unbiased observational and interventional distributions from biased data using partial external information, the complexity of the backdoor adjustment and the method's strong reliance on observational data limit its applicability in many practical settings. In this…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Nonparametric "rich covariates" without saturation

无需饱和设定的非参数“丰富协变量”方法

We consider two nonparametric approaches to ensure that linear instrumental variables estimators satisfy the rich-covariates condition emphasized by Blandhol et al. (2025), even when the instrument is not unconditionally randomly assigned and the model is not saturated. Both approaches start with a nonparametric estimate of the expectation of the instrument conditional on the covariates, and ensure that the rich-covariates condition is satisfied either by using as the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

PrivATE: Differentially Private Confidence Intervals for Average Treatment Effects

PrivATE:平均处理效应的差分隐私置信区间

The average treatment effect (ATE) is widely used to evaluate the effectiveness of drugs and other medical interventions. In safety-critical applications like medicine, reliable inferences about the ATE typically require valid uncertainty quantification, such as through confidence intervals (CIs). However, estimating treatment effects in these settings often involves sensitive data that must be kept private. In this work, we present PrivATE, a novel machine learning…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Inference for Experiments with Latent Outcomes: Key Results and Their Implications for Design and Analysis

潜在结局实验的因果推断:关键结果及其设计与分析含义

How should researchers analyze randomized experiments in which the main outcome is latent and measured in multiple ways but each measure contains some degree of error? We first identify a critical study-specific noncomparability problem in existing methods for handling multiple measurements, which often rely on strong modeling assumptions or arbitrary standardization. Such approaches render the resulting estimands noncomparable across studies. To address the problem, we…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Bayesian approach to the survivor average causal effect in cluster-randomized crossover trials

集群随机交叉试验中存活者平均因果效应的贝叶斯方法

In cluster-randomized crossover (CRXO) trials, groups of individuals are randomly assigned to two or more sequences of alternating treatments. Since clusters serve as their own control, the CRXO design is typically more statistically efficient than the usual parallel-arm design. CRXO trials are increasingly popular in many areas of health research where the number of available clusters is limited. Further, in trials among severely ill patients, researchers often want to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Performance of prior event rate ratio method in the presence of differential mortality or dropout

差异性死亡或退出下既往事件率比方法的表现

Purpose: Prior event rate ratio (PERR) method was proposed to control for measured or unmeasured confounders in real-world evaluation of effectiveness and safety of medical treatments using electronic medical records data. A widely cited simulation study showed that PERR estimate of treatment effect was biased in the presence of differential morality/dropout. However, the study only considered one specific PERR estimator of treatment effect and one specific scenario of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Partial Identification via Conditional Optimal Transport

通过条件最优输运实现因果部分识别

We study the estimation of causal estimand involving the joint distribution of treatment and control outcomes for a single unit. In typical causal inference settings, it is impossible to observe both outcomes simultaneously, which places our estimation within the domain of partial identification (PI). Pre-treatment covariates can substantially reduce estimation uncertainty by shrinking the partially identified set. Recent work has shown that covariate-assisted PI sets can be…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A longitudinal Bayesian framework for estimating causal dose-response relationships

估计纵向因果剂量反应关系的贝叶斯框架

Existing causal methods for time-varying exposure and time-varying confounding focus on estimating the average causal effect of a time-varying binary treatment on an end-of-study outcome, offering limited tools for characterizing marginal causal dose-response relationships under continuous exposures. We propose a scalable, nonparametric Bayesian framework for estimating marginal longitudinal causal dose-response functions with repeated outcome measurements. Our approach…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Generalizing causal effects with noncompliance: Application to deep canvassing experiments

存在不依从时的因果效应推广:深度游说实验应用

Standard approaches in generalizability often focus on generalizing the intent-to-treat (ITT). However, in practice, a more policy-relevant quantity is the generalized impact of an intervention across compliers. While instrumental variable (IV) methods are commonly used to estimate the complier average causal effect (CACE) within samples, standard approaches cannot be applied to a target population with a different distribution from the study sample. This paper makes several…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal inference with dyadic data in randomized experiments

随机实验中成对数据的因果推断

Estimating treatment effects in networked settings is a central challenge in online controlled experiments, particularly on social media platforms. We investigate a scenario where the unit-level outcome of interest comprises a series of dyadic outcomes that record pairwise interactions between units, spanning from point-to-point messaging at the microscale to bilateral trade flows at the macroscale. Because the response is defined at the dyadic level, the treatment assigned…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Aligning Language Models with Observational Data: Opportunities and Risks from a Causal Perspective

利用观测数据对齐语言模型:因果视角下的机会与风险

Large language models are being widely used across industries to generate text that contributes directly to key performance metrics, such as medication adherence in patient messaging and conversion rates in content generation. Pretrained models, however, often fall short when it comes to aligning with human preferences or optimizing for business objectives. As a result, fine-tuning with good-quality labeled data is essential to guide models to generate content that achieves…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects

用于因果效应部分识别的数据融合

Data fusion techniques integrate information from heterogeneous data sources to improve learning, generalization, and decision making across data sciences. In causal inference, these methods leverage rich observational data to improve causal effect estimation, while maintaining the trustworthiness of randomized controlled trials. Existing approaches often relax the strong no unobserved confounding assumption by instead assuming exchangeability of counterfactual outcomes…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A studentized permutation test for the treatment effect in individual participant data meta-analysis

个体参与者数据元分析中处理效应的学生化置换检验

Meta-analysis is a well-established tool used to combine data from several independent studies, each of which usually compares the effect of an experimental treatment with a control group. While meta-analyses are often performed using aggregated study summaries, they may also be conducted using individual participant data (IPD). Classical meta-analysis models may be generalized to handle continuous IPD by formulating them within a linear mixed model framework. IPD…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Meta-Analysis: Rethinking the Foundations of Evidence-Based Medicine

因果元分析:重新审视循证医学的基础

Meta-analysis, by synthesizing effect estimates from multiple studies conducted in diverse settings, stands at the top of the evidence hierarchy in clinical research. Yet, conventional approaches based on fixed- or random-effects models lack a causal framework, which may limit their interpretability and utility for public policy. Incorporating causal inference reframes meta-analysis as the estimation of well-defined causal effects on clearly specified populations, enabling a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

Using Experiments to Correct for Selection in Observational Studies

利用实验纠正观察性研究中的选择偏差

Researchers increasingly have access to two types of data: (i) large observational datasets where treatment (e.g., class size) is not randomized but several primary outcomes (e.g., graduation rates) and secondary outcomes (e.g., test scores) are observed and (ii) experimental data in which treatment is randomized but only secondary outcomes are observed. We develop a new method to estimate treatment effects on primary outcomes in such settings. We use the difference between…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Nested Nonparametric Instrumental Variable Regression

嵌套非参数工具变量回归

Several causal parameters in short panel data models are functionals of a nested nonparametric instrumental variable regression (nested NPIV). Recent examples include mediated, time varying, and long term treatment effects identified using proxy variables. In econometrics, examples arise in triangular simultaneous equations and hedonic price systems. However, it appears that explicit mean square convergence rates for nested NPIV are unknown, preventing inference on some of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Comparing Experimental and Nonexperimental Methods: What Lessons Have We Learned Four Decades After LaLonde (1986)?

比较实验与非实验方法:LaLonde(1986)四十年后的经验教训

In 1986, Robert LaLonde published an article comparing nonexperimental estimates to experimental benchmarks (LaLonde 1986). He concluded that the nonexperimental methods at the time could not systematically replicate experimental benchmarks, casting doubt on their credibility. Following LaLonde's critical assessment, there have been significant methodological advances and practical changes, including (i) an emphasis on the unconfoundedness assumption separated from…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Integer Programming for Generalized Causal Bootstrap Designs

广义因果自助法设计的整数规划

In experimental causal inference, we distinguish between two sources of uncertainty: design uncertainty, due to the treatment assignment mechanism, and sampling uncertainty, when the sample is drawn from a super-population. This distinction matters in settings with small fixed samples and heterogeneous treatment effects, as in geographical experiments. The standard bootstrap procedure most often used by practitioners primarily estimates sampling uncertainty, and the causal…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓