每日简报

含潜在混杂的汇总因果图中微观总效应的可识别性：前门准则扩展AI 解读

Conducting experiments to estimate total effects can be challenging due to cost, ethical concerns, or practical limitations. As an alternative, researchers often rely on causal graphs to determine whether these effects can be identified from observational data. Identifying total effects in fully specified causal graphs has received considerable attention, with Pearl's front-door criterion enabling the identification of total effects in the presence of latent confounding even…

利用观察数据学习最优动态处理规则AI 解读

Public policies and medical interventions often involve dynamic treatment assignments, in which individuals receive a sequence of interventions over multiple stages. We study the statistical learning of optimal dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) that determine the optimal treatment assignment for each individual at each stage based on their evolving history. We propose a novel, doubly robust, classification-based method for learning the optimal DTR from observational data…

多时期分布型双重差分模型AI 解读

Researchers are often interested in evaluating the impact of a policy on the entire (or specific parts of the) distribution of the outcome of interest. In this paper, I provide a method to recover the whole distribution of the untreated potential outcome for the treated group in non-experimental settings with staggered treatment adoption by generalizing the existing quantile treatment effects on the treated (QTT) estimator proposed by Callaway and Li (2019). Besides the QTT,…

外部对照试验中处理组平均处理效应估计方法的比较AI 解读

While randomized trials may be the gold standard for evaluating the effectiveness of the treatment intervention, in some special circumstances, single-arm clinical trials utilizing external control may be considered. The causal treatment effect of interest for single-arm trials is usually the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) rather than the average treatment effect (ATE). Although methods have been developed to estimate the ATT, the selection and use of these…

结果缺失下的设计型因果推断：缺失机制、插补随机化检验与协变量调整AI 解读

Design-based causal inference, also known as randomization-based or finite-population causal inference, is one of the most widely used causal inference frameworks, largely due to the merit that its validity can be guaranteed by study design (e.g., randomized experiments) and does not require assuming specific outcome-generating distributions or super-population models. Despite its advantages, design-based causal inference can still suffer from other issues, among which…

通过 BRAIN 实现快速再随机化AI 解读

Randomized experiments are a crucial tool for causal inference in many different fields. Rerandomization addresses any covariate imbalance in such experiments by resampling treatment assignments until certain balance criteria are satisfied. However, rerandomization based on naïve acceptance-rejection sampling is computationally inefficient, especially when numerous independent assignments are required to perform randomization-based statistical inference. Existing…