跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 29 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 29 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

A Unified Approach for Estimating Various Treatment Effects in Causal Inference

因果推断中多类处理效应的统一估计方法

In this paper, we introduce a unified estimator to analyze various treatment effects in causal inference, including but not limited to the average treatment effect (ATE) and the quantile treatment effect (QTE). The proposed estimator is developed under the statistical functional and cumulative distribution function structure, which leads to a flexible and robust estimator and covers some frequent treatment effects. In addition, our approach also takes variable selection into…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Integrate Meta-analysis into Specific Study (InMASS) for Estimating Conditional Average Treatment Effect

将元分析整合到特定研究中以估计条件平均处理效应:InMASS

Randomized controlled trials are the standard method for estimating causal effects, ensuring sufficient statistical power and confidence through adequate sample sizes. However, achieving such sample sizes is often challenging. This study proposes a novel method for estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) in a target population by integrating and reconstructing information from previous trials using only summary statistics of outcomes and covariates through…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Identification and estimation of treatment effects in a linear factor model with fixed number of time periods

固定时期数线性因子模型中处理效应的识别与估计

This paper provides a new approach for identifying and estimating the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated under a linear factor model that allows for multiple time-varying unobservables. Unlike the majority of the literature on treatment effects in linear factor models, our approach does not require the number of pre-treatment periods to go to infinity to obtain a valid estimator. Our identification approach employs a certain nonlinear transformations of the time…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Two Level Nested and Sequential Logit

两层嵌套 Logit 与序贯 Logit

This technical note provides comprehensive derivations of fundamental equations in two-level nested and sequential logit models for analyzing hierarchical choice structures. We present derivations of the Berry (1994) inversion formula, nested inclusive values computation, and multi-level market share equations, complementing existing literature. While conceptually distinct, nested and sequential logit models share mathematical similarities and, under specific distributional…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Computational Theory for Efficient Mini Agent Evaluation with Causal Guarantees

具有因果保证的高效小型智能体评估计算理论

In order to reduce the cost of experimental evaluation for agents, we introduce a computational theory of evaluation for mini agents: build evaluation model to accelerate the evaluation procedures. We prove upper bounds of generalized error and generalized causal effect error of given evaluation models for infinite agents. We also prove efficiency, and consistency to estimated causal effect from deployed agents to evaluation metric by prediction. To learn evaluation models,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Treatment Effects Inference with High-Dimensional Instruments and Control Variables

高维工具变量与控制变量下的处理效应推断

Obtaining valid treatment effect inference remains a challenging problem when dealing with numerous instruments and non-sparse control variables. In this paper, we propose a novel ridge regularization-based instrumental variables method for estimation and inference in the presence of both high-dimensional instrumental variables and high-dimensional control variables. These methods are applicable both with and without sparsity assumptions. To remove the estimation bias, we…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Reinterpreting demand estimation

重新理解需求估计

This paper clarifies how and why structural demand models (Berry and Haile, 2014, 2024) predict unit-level counterfactual outcomes. We do so by casting structural assumptions equivalently as restrictions on the joint distribution of potential outcomes. Our reformulation highlights a counterfactual homogeneity assumption underlying structural demand models: The relationship between counterfactual outcomes is assumed to be identical across markets. This assumption is strong,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference on effect size after multiple hypothesis testing

多重假设检验后的效应量推断

Significant treatment effects are often emphasized when interpreting and summarizing empirical findings in studies that estimate multiple, possibly many, treatment effects. Under this kind of selective reporting, conventional treatment effect estimates may be biased and their corresponding confidence intervals may undercover the true effect sizes. We propose new estimators and confidence intervals that provide valid inferences on the effect sizes of the significant effects…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Constraint-based causal discovery with tiered background knowledge and latent variables in single or overlapping datasets

含潜变量的单一或重叠数据集中的分层背景知识与约束式因果发现

In this paper we consider the use of tiered background knowledge within constraint based causal discovery. Our focus is on settings relaxing causal sufficiency, i.e. allowing for latent variables which may arise because relevant information could not be measured at all, or not jointly, as in the case of multiple overlapping datasets. We first present novel insights into the properties of the 'tiered FCI' (tFCI) algorithm. Building on this, we introduce a new extension of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Regression-Based Estimation of Causal Effects in the Presence of Selection Bias and Confounding

存在选择偏差与混杂时的因果效应回归估计

We consider the problem of estimating the expected causal effect $E[Y|do(X)]$ for a target variable $Y$ when treatment $X$ is set by intervention, focusing on continuous random variables. In settings without selection bias or confounding, $E[Y|do(X)] = E[Y|X]$, which can be estimated using standard regression methods. However, regression fails when systematic missingness induced by selection bias, or confounding distorts the data. Proxy variables unaffected by the selection…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Simple Specification-Free Causal Inference in Large Panels

大面板中的简洁、无需特定参数设定的因果推断

We propose a simple and transparent approach to causal inference using panel data with a large number of units and periods. Instead of imposing a particular parametric specification on the untreated potential outcomes, we assume they follow a nonparametric nonseparable factor model. We use long pre-treatment outcome histories to construct a measure of similarity between the latent factors of different units. Using this measure, we impute missing counterfactual means and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Minimax Rate-Optimal Inference for Individualized Quantile Treatment Effects in High-dimensional Models

高维模型中个体化分位数处理效应的极小极大速率最优推断

The quantification of treatment effects plays an important role in a wide range of applications, including policy making and bio-pharmaceutical research. In this article, we study the quantile treatment effect (QTE) while addressing two specific types of heterogeneities: (a) personalized heterogeneity, which captures the varying treatment effects for different individuals, and (b) quantile heterogeneity, which accounts for how the impact of covariates varies across different…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Local Interference: Removing Interference Bias in Semi-Parametric Causal Models

局部干扰:半参数因果模型中干扰偏差的消除

Interference bias is a major impediment to identifying causal effects in real-world settings. For example, vaccination reduces the transmission of a virus in a population such that everyone benefits -- even those who are not treated. This is a source of bias that must be accounted for if one wants to learn the true effect of a vaccine on an individual's immune system. Previous approaches addressing interference bias require strong domain knowledge in the form of a graphical…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Leveraging External Controls in Clinical Trials: Estimands, Estimation, Assumptions

临床试验中利用外部对照:目标量、估计与假设

It is increasingly common to augment randomized controlled trial with external controls from observational data, to evaluate the treatment effect of an intervention. Traditional approaches to treatment effect estimation involve ambiguous estimands and unrealistic or strong assumptions, such as mean exchangeability. We introduce a double-indexed notation for potential outcomes to define causal estimands transparently and clarify distinct sources of implicit bias. We show that…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimation of Latent Group Structures in Time-Varying Panel Data Models

时变面板数据模型中潜在分组结构的估计

We consider panel data models where coefficients change smoothly over time and follow a latent group structure, being homogeneous within but heterogeneous across groups. To jointly estimate the group membership and group-specific coefficient trajectories, we propose FUSE-TIME, a pairwise adaptive group fused-Lasso estimator combined with polynomial spline sieves. We establish consistency, derive the asymptotic distributions of the penalized sieve estimator and its…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Powering RCTs for marginal effects with GLMs using prognostic score adjustment

用预后评分调整提升广义线性模型随机试验边际效应分析的功效

In randomized clinical trials (RCTs), the accurate estimation of marginal treatment effects is crucial for determining the efficacy of interventions. Enhancing the statistical power of these analyses is a key objective for statisticians. The increasing availability of historical data from registries, prior trials, and health records presents an opportunity to improve trial efficiency. However, many methods for historical borrowing compromise strict type-I error rate control.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Identification of Average Treatment Effects in Nonparametric Panel Models

非参数面板模型中平均处理效应的识别

This paper studies identification of average treatment effects in a panel data setting. It introduces a novel nonparametric factor model and proves identification of average treatment effects. The identification proof is based on the introduction of a consistent estimator. Underlying the proof is a result that there is a consistent estimator for the expected outcome in the absence of the treatment for each unit and time period; this result can be applied more broadly, for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

Noise-Induced Randomization in Regression Discontinuity Designs

断点回归设计中的噪声诱导随机化

Regression discontinuity designs assess causal effects in settings where treatment is determined by whether an observed running variable crosses a pre-specified threshold. Here we propose a new approach to identification, estimation, and inference in regression discontinuity designs that uses knowledge about exogenous noise (e.g., measurement error) in the running variable. In our strategy, we weight treated and control units to balance a latent variable of which the running…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Copula-based Sensitivity Analysis for Multi-Treatment Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounding

未观测混杂下多处理因果推断的copula敏感性分析

Recent work has focused on the potential and pitfalls of causal identification in observational studies with multiple simultaneous treatments. Building on previous work, we show that even if the conditional distribution of unmeasured confounders given treatments were known exactly, the causal effects would not in general be identifiable, although they may be partially identified. Given these results, we propose a sensitivity analysis method for characterizing the effects of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Recovery and inference of causal effects with sequential adjustment for confounding and attrition

通过序贯调整混杂与样本流失恢复因果效应并开展推断

Confounding bias and selection bias bring two significant challenges to the validity of conclusions drawn from applied causal inference. The latter can stem from informative missingness, such as in cases of attrition. We introduce the Sequential Adjustment Criteria (SAC), which extend available graphical conditions for recovering causal effects from confounding and attrition using sequential regressions, allowing for the inclusion of post-exposure and forbidden variables in…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Federated Causal Inference: Multi-Study ATE Estimation beyond Meta-Analysis

联邦因果推断:超越元分析的多研究平均处理效应估计

We study Federated Causal Inference, an approach to estimate treatment effects from decentralized data across centers. We compare three classes of Average Treatment Effect (ATE) estimators derived from the Plug-in G-Formula, ranging from simple meta-analysis to one-shot and multi-shot federated learning, the latter leveraging the full data to learn the outcome model (albeit requiring more communication). Focusing on Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), we derive the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Incorporating Auxiliary Variables to Improve the Efficiency of Time-Varying Treatment Effect Estimation

利用辅助变量提高时变处理效应估计效率

Contextual sensing and delivery of digital interventions to improve health outcomes have gained significant traction in behavioral and psychiatric studies. Micro-randomized trials (MRTs) are a common experimental design for obtaining data-driven evidence on the effectiveness of digital interventions where each individual is repeatedly randomized to receive treatments over numerous time points. Throughout the study, individual characteristics and contextual factors around…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference for Cumulative Incidences and Treatment Effects in Randomized Controlled Trials with Time-to-Event Outcomes under ICH E9 (R1)

ICH E9(R1)框架下随机试验累积发生率与处理效应的推断

In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that focus on time-to-event outcomes, intercurrent events can arise in two ways: as semi-competing events, which modify the hazard of the primary outcome events, or as competing events, which make the definition of the primary outcome events unclear. Although five strategies have been proposed in the ICH E9 (R1) addendum to address intercurrent events in RCTs, these strategies are not easily applicable to time-to-event outcomes when…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Adding covariates to bounds: What is the question?

给识别界加入协变量:究竟要回答什么问题?

Symbolic nonparametric bounds for partial identification of causal effects now have a long history in the causal literature. Sharp bounds, bounds that use all available information to make the range of values as narrow as possible, are often the goal. For this reason, many publications have focused on deriving sharp bounds, but the concept of sharp bounds is nuanced and can be misleading. In settings with ancillary covariates, the situation becomes more complex. We provide…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓