每日简报

利用神经网络估计结构模型参数AI 解读

We study an alternative use of machine learning. We train neural nets to provide the parameter estimate of a given (structural) econometric model, for example, discrete choice or consumer search. Training examples consist of datasets generated by the econometric model under a range of parameter values. The neural net takes the moments of a dataset as input and tries to recognize the parameter value underlying that dataset. Besides the point estimate, the neural net can also…

因果推断中具有实际效果的调整变量选择AI 解读

In the estimation of causal effects, one common method for removing the influence of confounders is to adjust the variables that satisfy the back-door criterion. However, it is not always possible to uniquely determine sets of such variables. Moreover, real-world data is almost always limited, which means it may be insufficient for statistical estimation. Therefore, we propose criteria for selecting variables from a list of candidate adjustment variables along with an…

给识别界加入协变量：究竟要回答什么问题？AI 解读

Symbolic nonparametric bounds for partial identification of causal effects now have a long history in the causal literature. Sharp bounds, bounds that use all available information to make the range of values as narrow as possible, are often the goal. For this reason, many publications have focused on deriving sharp bounds, but the concept of sharp bounds is nuanced and can be misleading. In settings with ancillary covariates, the situation becomes more complex. We provide…

网络依赖与干扰下双重差分的高效非参数估计AI 解读

Differences-in-differences (DiD) is a causal inference method for observational longitudinal data that assumes parallel expected potential outcome trajectories between treatment groups under the counterfactual scenario where all units receive a specific treatment. In this paper DiD is extended to allow for: (i) non-identically distributed treatment effects and exposure probabilities; (ii) interference, where treatment of one unit can affect outcomes in neighboring units; and…

关于处理效应异质性序贯验证与随机实验机器学习推断评论的回应AI 解读

We warmly thank Kosuke Imai, Michael Lingzhi Li, and Stefan Wager for their gracious and insightful comments. We are particularly encouraged that both pieces recognize the importance of the research agenda the lecture laid out, which we see as critical for applied researchers. It is also great to see that both underscore the potential of the basic approach we propose - targeting summary features of the CATE after proxy estimation with sample splitting. We are also happy that…

利用神经网络估计网络模型AI 解读

Exponential random graph models (ERGMs) are very flexible for modeling network formation but pose difficult estimation challenges due to their intractable normalizing constant. Existing methods, such as MCMC-MLE, rely on sequential simulation at every optimization step. We propose a neural network approach that trains on a single, large set of parameter-simulation pairs to learn the mapping from parameters to average network statistics. Once trained, this map can be…

多研究因果森林：处理效应异质性变化下的数据借用框架AI 解读

Tailoring treatment assignment to specific individuals can improve the health outcomes, but a single study may offer inadequate information for this purpose. The ability to leverage information from an auxiliary data source deemed to be `most similar' to a primary data source has been shown to improve estimates of treatment effects. In this paper, we introduce a framework, the Multi-Study Causal Forest (MCF), to borrow individual patient-level data from an auxiliary data…

同时采用假想策略与治疗策略处理多个伴发事件AI 解读

To precisely define the treatment effect of interest in a clinical trial, the ICH E9 estimand addendum describes that relevant so-called intercurrent events should be identified and strategies specified to deal with them. Handling intercurrent events with different strategies leads to different estimands. In this paper, we focus on estimands that involve addressing one intercurrent event with the treatment policy strategy and another with the hypothetical strategy. We define…

MXMap：动力系统因果发现的多变量交叉映射框架AI 解读

Convergent Cross Mapping (CCM) is a powerful method for detecting causality in coupled nonlinear dynamical systems, providing a model-free approach to capture dynamic causal interactions. Partial Cross Mapping (PCM) was introduced as an extension of CCM to address indirect causality in three-variable systems by comparing cross-mapping quality between direct cause-effect mapping and indirect mapping through an intermediate conditioning variable. However, PCM remains limited…

近似随机化检验中的聚类合并方法AI 解读

This paper develops procedures to combine clusters for the approximate randomization test proposed by Canay, Romano, and Shaikh (2017). Their test can be used to conduct inference with a small number of clusters and imposes weak requirements on the correlation structure. However, their test requires the target parameter to be identified within each cluster. A leading example where this requirement fails to hold is when a variable has no variation within clusters. For…

平均处理效应自适应估计的乐观算法AI 解读

Estimation and inference for the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) is a cornerstone of causal inference and often serves as the foundation for developing procedures for more complicated settings. Although traditionally analyzed in a batch setting, recent advances in martingale theory have paved the way for adaptive methods that can enhance the power of downstream inference. Despite these advances, progress in understanding and developing adaptive algorithms remains in its early…

从统计目标量到机器学习估计量：面向流行病学研究者的推导指南AI 解读

Epidemiologists increasingly use causal inference methods that rely on machine learning, as these approaches can relax unnecessary model specification assumptions. While deriving and studying asymptotic properties of such estimators is a task usually associated with statisticians, it is useful for epidemiologists to understand the steps involved, as epidemiologists are often at the forefront of defining important new research questions and translating them into new…

回应关于估计条件关系的近期批评：对 Hainmueller、Mummolo 与 Xu（2019）的澄清AI 解读

Simonsohn (2024a) and Simonsohn (2024b) critique Hainmueller, Mummolo and Xu (2019, HMX), arguing that failing to model nonlinear relationships between the treatment and moderator leads to biased marginal effect estimates and uncontrolled Type-I error rates. While these critiques highlight the issue of under-modeling nonlinearity in applied research, they are fundamentally flawed in several key ways. First, the causal estimand for interaction effects and the necessary…

网络干扰下的因果推断：回归调整与最优性AI 解读

In randomized controlled trials without interference, regression adjustment is widely used to enhance the efficiency of treatment effect estimation. This paper extends this efficiency principle to settings with network interference, where a unit's response may depend on the treatments assigned to its neighbors in a network. We make three key contributions: (1) we establish a central limit theorem for a linear regression-adjusted estimator and prove its optimality in…

以重复 A/A 检验评估 A/B 测试中 t 检验的可靠性AI 解读

A/B-tests are a cornerstone of experimental design on the web, with wide-ranging applications and use-cases. The statistical $t$-test comparing differences in means is the most commonly used method for assessing treatment effects, often justified through the Central Limit Theorem (CLT). The CLT ascertains that, as the sample size grows, the sampling distribution of the Average Treatment Effect converges to normality, making the $t$-test valid for sufficiently large sample…

随机系数模型的切片 Wasserstein 距离与扩散方法AI 解读

We propose a new minimum-distance estimator for linear random coefficient models. This estimator integrates the recently advanced sliced Wasserstein distance with the nearest neighbor methods, both of which enhance computational efficiency. We demonstrate that the proposed method is consistent in approximating the true distribution. Moreover, our formulation naturally leads to a diffusion process-based algorithm and is closely connected to treatment effect distribution…

通过纳入协变量的最优传输收紧因果效应界AI 解读

Causal estimands can vary significantly depending on the relationship between outcomes in treatment and control groups, potentially leading to wide partial identification (PI) intervals that impede decision making. Incorporating covariates can substantially tighten these bounds, but requires determining the range of PI over probability models consistent with the joint distributions of observed covariates and outcomes in treatment and control groups. This problem is known to…

利用因果速度模型区分原因与结果AI 解读

Bivariate structural causal models (SCM) are often used to infer causal direction by examining their goodness-of-fit under restricted model classes. In this paper, we describe a parametrization of bivariate SCMs in terms of a causal velocity by viewing the cause variable as time in a dynamical system. The velocity implicitly defines counterfactual curves via the solution of initial value problems where the observation specifies the initial condition. Using tools from measure…

面板数据估计与推断：同质性与异质性AI 解读

In this paper, we define an underlying data generating process that allows for different magnitudes of cross-sectional dependence, along with time series autocorrelation. This is achieved via high-dimensional moving average processes of infinite order (HDMA($\infty$)). Our setup and investigation integrates and enhances homogenous and heterogeneous panel data estimation and testing in a unified way. To study HDMA($\infty$), we extend the Beveridge-Nelson decomposition to a…

一般网络干扰下能否验证反事实估计？AI 解读

Randomized experiments have become a cornerstone of evidence-based decision-making in contexts ranging from online platforms to public health. However, in experimental settings with network interference, a unit's treatment can influence outcomes of other units, challenging both causal effect estimation and its validation. Classic validation approaches fail as outcomes are only observable under a single treatment scenario and exhibit complex correlation patterns due to…

GST-UNet：处理时变混杂的时空因果推断神经框架AI 解读

Estimating causal effects from spatiotemporal observational data is essential in public health, environmental science, and policy evaluation, where randomized experiments are often infeasible. Existing approaches, however, either rely on strong structural assumptions or fail to handle key challenges such as interference, spatial confounding, temporal carryover, and time-varying confounding -- where covariates are influenced by past treatments and, in turn, affect future…

结合贝叶斯加性回归树的第二类Tobit样本选择模型AI 解读

This paper introduces Type 2 Tobit Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (TOBART-2). BART can produce accurate individual-specific treatment effect estimates. However, in practice estimates are often biased by sample selection. We extend the Type 2 Tobit sample selection model to account for nonlinearities and model uncertainty by including sums of trees in both the selection and outcome equations. A Dirichlet Process Mixture distribution for the error terms allows for…

二元关系模型中的 Kotlarski 引理AI 解读

We show how to identify the distributions of the latent components in the two-way dyadic model for bipartite networks $y_{i,\ell}= α_i+η_{\ell}+\varepsilon_{i,\ell}$. This is achieved by a repeated application of the extension of the classical lemma of Kotlarski (1967) in Evdokimov and White (2012). We provide two separate sets of assumptions under which all the latent distributions are identified. Both rely on some of the latent components being identically distributed.

终末事件与仅在事件未发生时存在的评分之联合评估框架AI 解读

Analysis of data from randomized controlled trials in vulnerable populations requires special attention when assessing treatment effect by a score measuring, e.g., disease stage or activity together with onset of prevalent terminal events. In reality, it is impossible to disentangle a disease score from the terminal event, since the score is not clinically meaningful after this event. In this work, we propose to assess treatment interventions simultaneously on the terminal…