跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 37 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/13 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

Journal of the American Statistical Association 同步延迟 · 上次成功10月15日

本期 37 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期修订

General Covariance-Based Conditions for Central Limit Theorems with Dependent Triangular Arrays

依赖三角阵中心极限定理的一般协方差条件

We present a general central limit theorem with simple, easy-to-check covariance-based sufficient conditions for triangular arrays of random vectors when all variables could be interdependent. The result is constructed from Stein's method, but the conditions are distinct from related work. We show that these covariance conditions nest standard assumptions studied in the literature such as $M$-dependence, mixing random fields, non-mixing autoregressive processes, and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Modeling Causal Mechanisms with Diffusion Models for Interventional and Counterfactual Queries

利用扩散模型刻画因果机制并回答干预与反事实问题

We consider the problem of answering observational, interventional, and counterfactual queries in a causally sufficient setting where only observational data and the causal graph are available. Utilizing the recent developments in diffusion models, we introduce diffusion-based causal models (DCM) to learn causal mechanisms, that generate unique latent encodings. These encodings enable us to directly sample under interventions and perform abduction for counterfactuals.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Addressing selection bias in cluster randomized experiments via weighting

通过加权处理整群随机试验中的选择偏差

In cluster randomized experiments, individuals are often recruited after the cluster treatment assignment, and data are typically only available for the recruited sample. Post-randomization recruitment can lead to selection bias, inducing systematic differences between the overall and the recruited populations, and between the recruited intervention and control arms. In this setting, we define causal estimands for the overall and the recruited populations. We prove, under…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Nonparametric Jackknife Instrumental Variable Estimation and Confounding Robust Surrogate Indices

非参数刀切工具变量估计与抗混杂替代指标

Jackknife instrumental variable estimation (JIVE) is a classic method to leverage many weak instrumental variables (IVs) to estimate linear structural models, overcoming the bias of standard methods like two-stage least squares. In this paper, we extend the jackknife approach to nonparametric IV (NPIV) models with many weak IVs. Since NPIV characterizes the structural regression as having residuals projected onto the IV being zero, existing approaches minimize an estimate of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Finitely Heterogeneous Treatment Effect in Event-study

事件研究中的有限类型异质性处理效应

A key assumption of the differences-in-differences designs is that the average evolution of untreated potential outcomes is the same across different treatment cohorts: a parallel trends assumption. In this paper, we relax the parallel trend assumption by assuming a latent type variable and developing a type-specific parallel trend assumption. With a finite support assumption on the latent type variable and long pretreatment time periods, we show that an extremum classifier…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal Inference for Continuous Multiple Time Point Interventions

连续多时点干预的因果推断

There are limited options to estimate the treatment effects of variables which are continuous and measured at multiple time points, particularly if the true dose-response curve should be estimated as closely as possible. However, these situations may be of relevance: in pharmacology, one may be interested in how outcomes of people living with -- and treated for -- HIV, such as viral failure, would vary for time-varying interventions such as different drug concentration…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Multivariate Tie-breaker Designs

多变量中间区间随机化设计

In a tie-breaker design (TBD), subjects with high values of a running variable are given some (usually desirable) treatment, subjects with low values are not, and subjects in the middle are randomized. TBDs are intermediate between regression discontinuity designs (RDDs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). TBDs allow a tradeoff between the resource allocation efficiency of an RDD and the statistical efficiency of an RCT. We study a model where the expected response is…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Separable pathway effects of semi-competing risks using multi-state models

利用多状态模型分解半竞争风险中的可分离路径效应

Semi-competing risks refer to the phenomenon where a primary event (such as mortality) can ``censor'' an intermediate event (such as relapse of a disease), but not vice versa. Under the multi-state model, the primary event consists of two specific types: the direct outcome event and an indirect outcome event developed from intermediate events. Within this framework, we show that the total treatment effect on the cumulative incidence of the primary event can be decomposed…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Local Effects of Continuous Instruments without Positivity

无需正值性假设的连续工具变量局部效应

Instrumental variables are a popular study design for the estimation of treatment effects in the presence of unobserved confounders. In the canonical instrumental variables design, the instrument is a binary variable. In many settings, however, the instrument is continuous. Standard estimation methods can be applied with continuous instruments, but they require strong assumptions. While recent work has introduced more flexible estimation approaches, these methods require a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Federated Offline Policy Learning

联邦离线策略学习

We consider the problem of learning personalized decision policies from observational bandit feedback data across multiple heterogeneous data sources. In our approach, we introduce a novel regret analysis that establishes finite-sample upper bounds on distinguishing notions of global regret for all data sources on aggregate and of local regret for any given data source. We characterize these regret bounds by expressions of source heterogeneity and distribution shift.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Multiple conditional randomization tests for lagged and spillover treatment effects

滞后与溢出处理效应的多个条件随机化检验

We consider the problem of constructing multiple independent conditional randomization tests using a single dataset. Because the tests are independent, the randomization p-values can be interpreted individually and combined using standard methods for multiple testing. We give a simple, sequential construction of such tests, and then discuss its application to three problems: Rosenbaum's evidence factors for observational studies, lagged treatment effect in stepped-wedge…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Instrumental Variable Approach to Estimating Individual Causal Effects in N-of-1 Trials: Application to ISTOP Study

N-of-1 试验中个体因果效应的工具变量估计:ISTOP 应用

An N-of-1 trial is a multiple crossover trial conducted in a single individual to provide evidence to directly inform personalized treatment decisions. Advancements in wearable devices greatly improved the feasibility of adopting these trials to identify optimal individual treatment plans, particularly when treatments differ among individuals and responses are highly heterogeneous. Our work was motivated by the I-STOP-AFib Study, which examined the impact of different…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Generalized Difference-in-Differences Estimator for Randomized Stepped-Wedge and Observational Staggered Adoption Settings

适用于随机阶梯楔形与观察性交错采用的广义双重差分估计

Staggered treatment adoption arises in the evaluation of policy impact and implementation in many settings, including both randomized stepped-wedge trials and non-randomized quasi-experiments with panel data. In both settings, getting an interpretable, unbiased effect estimate requires careful consideration of the target estimand and possible treatment effect heterogeneities. This paper proposes a novel non-parametric approach to this estimation for either setting. By…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓