跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

期刊按可核实的首次发表日期归档;仅纳入收录当月新发表或已提前取得题录的论文,历史补录只留在文献库。只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报,只有年份或日期待核的不进简报。arXiv 按原站 UTC 首次提交日和当前版本修订日分组,同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 25 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 25 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

Inference on Consensus Ranking of Distributions

分布共识排序的统计推断

Instead of testing for unanimous agreement, I propose learning how broad of a consensus favors one distribution over another (of earnings, productivity, asset returns, test scores, etc.). Specifically, given a sample from each of two distributions, I propose statistical inference methods to learn about the set of utility functions for which the first distribution has higher expected utility than the second distribution. With high probability, an "inner" confidence set is…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Enhancing Causal Discovery in Financial Networks with Piecewise Quantile Regression

利用分段分位数回归改进金融网络中的因果发现

Financial networks can be constructed using statistical dependencies found within the price series of speculative assets. Across the various methods used to infer these networks, there is a general reliance on predictive modelling to capture cross-correlation effects. These methods usually model the flow of mean-response information, or the propagation of volatility and risk within the market. Such techniques, though insightful, don't fully capture the broader…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Continuous difference-in-differences with double/debiased machine learning

结合双重/去偏机器学习的连续处理双重差分

This paper extends difference-in-differences to settings with continuous treatments. Specifically, the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) at any level of treatment intensity is identified under a conditional parallel trends assumption. Estimating the ATT in this framework requires first estimating infinite-dimensional nuisance parameters, particularly the conditional density of the continuous treatment, which can introduce substantial bias. To address this…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Non-Plug-In Estimators Could Outperform Plug-In Estimators: a Cautionary Note and a Diagnosis

非代入估计量可能优于代入估计量:警示与诊断

Objectives: Highly flexible nonparametric estimators have gained popularity in causal inference and epidemiology. Popular examples of such estimators include targeted maximum likelihood estimators (TMLE) and double machine learning (DML). TMLE is often argued or suggested to be better than DML estimators and several other estimators in small to moderate samples -- even if they share the same large-sample properties -- because TMLE is a plug-in estimator and respects the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Gradient Wild Bootstrap for Instrumental Variable Quantile Regressions with Weak and Few Clusters

少数大聚类与弱识别下工具变量分位数回归的梯度野生自助法

We study the gradient wild bootstrap-based inference for instrumental variable quantile regressions in the framework of a small number of large clusters in which the number of clusters is viewed as fixed, and the number of observations for each cluster diverges to infinity. For the Wald inference, we show that our wild bootstrap Wald test, with or without studentization using the cluster-robust covariance estimator (CRVE), controls size asymptotically up to a small error as…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

SPORTSCausal: Spill-Over Time Series Causal Inference

SPORTSCausal:存在溢出效应的时间序列因果推断

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have long been the gold standard for causal inference across various fields, including business analysis, economic studies, sociology, clinical research, and network learning. The primary advantage of RCTs over observational studies lies in their ability to significantly reduce noise from individual variance. However, RCTs depend on strong assumptions, such as group independence, time independence, and group randomness, which are not…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

What if? Causal Machine Learning in Supply Chain Risk Management

如果改变会怎样?供应链风险管理中的因果机器学习

The penultimate goal for developing machine learning models in supply chain management is to make optimal interventions. However, most machine learning models identify correlations in data rather than inferring causation, making it difficult to systematically plan for better outcomes. In this article, we propose and evaluate the use of causal machine learning for developing supply chain risk intervention models, and demonstrate its use with a case study in supply chain risk…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference with Many Weak Instruments and Heterogeneity

大量弱工具变量与处理效应异质性下的推断

This paper considers inference in a linear instrumental variable regression model with many potentially weak instruments, in the presence of heterogeneous treatment effects. I first show that existing test procedures, including those that are robust to either weak instruments or heterogeneous treatment effects, can be arbitrarily oversized. I propose a novel and valid test based on a score statistic and a ``leave-three-out" variance estimator. In the presence of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Clarifying the Role of the Mantel-Haenszel Risk Difference Estimator in Randomized Clinical Trials

厘清随机临床试验中 Mantel–Haenszel 风险差估计量的作用

The Mantel-Haenszel (MH) risk difference estimator, commonly used in randomized clinical trials for binary outcomes, calculates a weighted average of stratum-specific risk difference estimators. Traditionally, this method requires the stringent assumption that risk differences are homogeneous across strata, also known as the common (constant) risk difference assumption. In our article, we relax this assumption and adopt a modern perspective, viewing the MH risk difference…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Reinforcement Learning for Causal Discovery without Acyclicity Constraints

无需显式无环约束的强化学习因果发现

Recently, reinforcement learning (RL) has proved a promising alternative for conventional local heuristics in score-based approaches to learning directed acyclic causal graphs (DAGs) from observational data. However, the intricate acyclicity constraint still challenges the efficient exploration of the vast space of DAGs in existing methods. In this study, we introduce ALIAS (reinforced dAg Learning wIthout Acyclicity conStraints), a novel approach to causal discovery powered…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Leveraging external data in the analysis of randomized controlled trials: a comparative analysis

随机对照试验分析中利用外部数据的方法比较

The use of patient-level information from previous studies, registries, and other external datasets can support the analysis of single-arm and randomized controlled trials to evaluate and test experimental treatments. However, the integration of external data in the analysis of clinical trials can also compromise the scientific validity of the results due to selection bias, study-to-study differences, unmeasured confounding, and other distortion mechanisms. Therefore,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A latent space model for multivariate count data time series analysis

多变量计数时间序列分析的潜在空间模型

Motivated by a dataset of burglaries in Chicago, USA, we introduce a novel framework to analyze time series of count data combining common multivariate time series models with latent position network models. This novel methodology allows us to gain a new latent variable perspective on the crime dataset that we consider, allowing us to disentangle and explain the complex patterns exhibited by the data, while providing a natural time series framework that can be used to make…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Robust Bayes Treatment Choice with Partial Identification

部分识别下的稳健贝叶斯处理选择

We study a class of binary treatment choice problems with partial identification through the lens of robust (multiple prior) Bayesian analysis. We use a convenient set of prior distributions to derive ex-ante and ex-post robust Bayes decision rules, both for decision makers who can randomize and for decision makers who cannot. Our main messages are as follows: First, ex-ante and ex-post robust Bayes decision rules do not agree in general, whether or not randomized rules are…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Difference-in-differences with as few as two cross-sectional units -- A new perspective to the democracy-growth debate

仅需两个截面单位的双重差分:民主与增长的新视角

Pooled panel analyses often mask heterogeneity in unit-specific treatment effects. This challenge, for example, crops up in studies of the impact of democracy on economic growth, where findings vary substantially due to differences in country composition. To address this challenge, this paper introduces the Temporal Difference-in-Differences (T-DiD) estimator that leverages temporal variation in the data to estimate unit-specific average treatment effects on the treated…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

Estimating Treatment Effects using Multiple Surrogates: The Role of the Surrogate Score and the Surrogate Index

利用多个替代指标估计处理效应:替代得分与替代指数

Estimating the long-term effects of treatments is of interest in many fields. A common challenge in estimating such treatment effects is that long-term outcomes are unobserved in the time frame needed to make policy decisions. One approach to overcome this missing data problem is to analyze treatments effects on an intermediate outcome, often called a statistical surrogate, if it satisfies the condition that treatment and outcome are independent conditional on the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Who Are We Missing? A Principled Approach to Characterizing the Underrepresented Population

我们遗漏了谁?识别代表性不足人群的系统方法

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) serve as the cornerstone for understanding causal effects, yet extending inferences to target populations presents challenges due to effect heterogeneity and underrepresentation. Our paper addresses the critical issue of identifying and characterizing underrepresented subgroups in RCTs, proposing a novel framework for refining target populations to improve generalizability. We introduce an optimization-based approach, Rashomon Set of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Fixed-b Asymptotics for Panel Models with Two-Way Clustering

双向聚类面板模型的固定 b 渐近理论

This paper studies a cluster robust variance estimator proposed by Chiang, Hansen and Sasaki (2024) for linear panels. First, we show algebraically that this variance estimator (CHS estimator, hereafter) is a linear combination of three common variance estimators: the one-way unit cluster estimator, the "HAC of averages" estimator, and the "average of HACs" estimator. Based on this finding, we obtain a fixed-$b$ asymptotic result for the CHS estimator and corresponding test…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Valid Inference After Causal Discovery

因果发现之后的有效推断

Causal discovery and causal effect estimation are two fundamental tasks in causal inference. While many methods have been developed for each task individually, statistical challenges arise when applying these methods jointly: estimating causal effects after running causal discovery algorithms on the same data leads to "double dipping," invalidating the coverage guarantees of classical confidence intervals. To this end, we develop tools for valid post-causal-discovery…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Revisiting Panel Data Discrete Choice Models with Lagged Dependent Variables

重新研究含滞后因变量的面板离散选择模型

This paper revisits the identification and estimation of a class of semiparametric (distribution-free) panel data binary choice models with lagged dependent variables, exogenous covariates, and entity fixed effects. We provide a novel identification strategy, using an "identification at infinity" argument. In contrast with the celebrated Honore and Kyriazidou (2000), our method permits time trends of any form and does not suffer from the "curse of dimensionality". We propose…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

$ρ$-GNF: A Copula-based Sensitivity Analysis to Unobserved Confounding Using Normalizing Flows

ρ-GNF:利用 Copula 与归一化流分析未观测混杂的敏感性

We propose a novel sensitivity analysis to unobserved confounding in observational studies using copulas and normalizing flows. Using the idea of interventional equivalence of structural causal models, we develop $ρ$-GNF ($ρ$-graphical normalizing flow), where $ρ{\in}[-1,+1]$ is a bounded sensitivity parameter. This parameter represents the back-door non-causal association due to unobserved confounding, and which is encoded with a Gaussian copula. In other words, the $ρ$-GNF…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Combining observational and experimental data for causal inference considering data privacy

考虑数据隐私的观察性与实验数据融合因果推断

Combining observational and experimental data for causal inference can improve treatment effect estimation. However, many observational data sets cannot be released due to data privacy considerations, so one researcher may not have access to both experimental and observational data. Nonetheless, a small amount of risk of disclosing sensitive information might be tolerable to organizations that house confidential data. In these cases, organizations can employ data privacy…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Treatment bootstrapping: A new approach to quantify uncertainty of average treatment effect estimates

处理组自助法:量化匹配处理效应估计的不确定性

This paper proposes a new non-parametric bootstrap method to quantify the uncertainty of average treatment effect estimate for the treated from matching estimators. More specifically, it seeks to quantify the uncertainty associated with the average treatment effect estimate for the treated by bootstrapping the treatment group only and finding the counterpart control group by pair matching on estimated propensity score without replacement. We demonstrate the validity of this…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Hidden Markov Models for Multivariate Panel Data

用于多变量面板数据的隐马尔可夫模型

While advances continue to be made in model-based clustering, challenges persist in modeling various data types such as panel data. Multivariate panel data present difficulties for clustering algorithms because they are often plagued by missing data and dropouts, presenting issues for estimation algorithms. This research presents a family of hidden Markov models that compensate for the issues that arise in panel data. A modified expectation-maximization algorithm capable of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Experimental Design For Causal Inference Through An Optimization Lens

从优化视角理解因果推断的实验设计

The study of experimental design offers tremendous benefits for answering causal questions across a wide range of applications, including agricultural experiments, clinical trials, industrial experiments, social experiments, and digital experiments. Although valuable in such applications, the costs of experiments often drive experimenters to seek more efficient designs. Recently, experimenters have started to examine such efficiency questions from an optimization…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓