跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 35 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 1/24 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 35 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

A Short Note on Event-Study Synthetic Difference-in-Differences Estimators

事件研究型合成双重差分估计量简论

I propose an event study extension of Synthetic Difference-in-Differences (SDID) estimators. I show that, in simple and staggered adoption designs, estimators from Arkhangelsky et al. (2021) can be disaggregated into dynamic treatment effect estimators, comparing the lagged outcome differentials of treated and synthetic controls to their pre-treatment average. Estimators presented in this note can be computed using the sdid_event Stata package.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Is Inference Conditional on Not Rejecting a Pre-test Less Reliable than Unconditional Inference?

Researchers often report an estimate and confidence interval only if a specification test does not reject - for example, only if a pre-trend test supports a difference-in-differences design. Does this make the reported confidence interval less reliable? We show that when the identifying assumptions hold, the answer is no: conditional on passing the pre-test, the confidence interval may over-cover but cannot under-cover. When the assumptions fail, pre-testing can reduce…

阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Data fusion for efficiency gain in ATE estimation: A practical review with simulations

数据融合提升平均处理效应估计效率:实用综述与模拟

The integration of real-world data (RWD) and randomized controlled trials (RCT) is increasingly important for advancing causal inference in scientific research. This combination holds great promise for enhancing the efficiency of causal effect estimation, offering benefits such as reduced trial participant numbers and expedited drug access for patients. Despite the availability of numerous data fusion methods, selecting the most appropriate one for a specific research…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Scalable Variational Causal Discovery Unconstrained by Acyclicity

无需显式无环约束的可扩展变分因果发现

Bayesian causal discovery offers the power to quantify epistemic uncertainties among a broad range of structurally diverse causal theories potentially explaining the data, represented in forms of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). However, existing methods struggle with efficient DAG sampling due to the complex acyclicity constraint. In this study, we propose a scalable Bayesian approach to effectively learn the posterior distribution over causal graphs given observational data…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Learning control variables and instruments for causal analysis in observational data

从观测数据中学习因果分析所需的控制变量与工具变量

This study introduces a data-driven, machine learning-based method to detect suitable control variables and instruments for assessing the causal effect of a treatment on an outcome in observational data. Our approach tests the joint existence of instruments, which are associated with the treatment but not directly with the outcome (at least conditional on observables), and suitable control variables, conditional on which the treatment is exogenous, and learns the partition…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Finely Stratified Rerandomization Designs

精细分层再随机化设计

Finely stratified randomization makes unadjusted treatment effect estimation efficient when matches are tight. However, match quality deteriorates rapidly as covariate dimension increases, attenuating the gains from stratification. Motivated by this problem, we study designs that finely stratify on a few important covariates, then rerandomize within matched groups to balance the remainder. We derive the asymptotic distribution for GMM estimators of general causal parameters…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Regularized estimation of Monge-Kantorovich quantiles for spherical data

球面数据的 Monge-Kantorovich 分位数正则化估计

Tools from optimal transport (OT) theory have recently been used to define a notion of quantile function for directional data. In practice, regularization is mandatory for applications that require out-of-sample estimates. To this end, we introduce a regularized estimator built from entropic optimal transport, by extending the definition of the entropic map to the spherical setting. We propose a stochastic algorithm to directly solve a continuous OT problem between the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

CURLS: Causal Rule Learning for Subgroups with Significant Treatment Effect

CURLS:具有显著处理效应的子群因果规则学习

In causal inference, estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) is critical for identifying how different subgroups respond to interventions, with broad applications in fields such as precision medicine and personalized advertising. Although HTE estimation methods aim to improve accuracy, how to provide explicit subgroup descriptions remains unclear, hindering data interpretation and strategic intervention management. In this paper, we propose CURLS, a novel rule…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Exploring causal effects of hormone- and radio-treatments in an observational study of breast cancer using copula-based semi-competing risks models

以 Copula 半竞争风险模型研究乳腺癌激素治疗与放疗的因果效应

Breast cancer patients may experience relapse or death after surgery during the follow-up period, leading to dependent censoring of relapse. This phenomenon, known as semi-competing risk, imposes challenges in analyzing treatment effects on breast cancer and necessitates advanced statistical tools for unbiased analysis. Despite progress in estimation and inference within semi-competing risks regression, its application to causal inference is still in its early stages. This…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Instrumental Variable methods to target Hypothetical Estimands with longitudinal repeated measures data: Application to the STEP 1 trial

纵向重复测量数据中针对假设性目标量的工具变量方法:STEP 1 试验应用

The STEP 1 randomized trial evaluated the effect of taking semaglutide vs placebo on body weight over a 68 week duration. As with any study evaluating an intervention delivered over a sustained period, non-adherence was observed. This was addressed in the original trial analysis within the Estimand Framework by viewing non-adherence as an intercurrent event. The primary analysis applied a treatment policy strategy which viewed it as an aspect of the treatment regimen, and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Absolute average and median treatment effects as causal estimands on metric spaces

度量空间上的绝对平均与中位处理效应

We define the notions of absolute average and median treatment effects as causal estimands on general metric spaces such as Riemannian manifolds, propose estimators using stratification, and prove several properties, including strong consistency. In the process, we also demonstrate the strong consistency of the weighted sample Fréchet means and geometric medians. Stratification allows these estimators to be utilized beyond the narrow constraints of a completely randomized…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Mechanisms for Data Sharing in Collaborative Causal Inference (Extended Version)

协作因果推断中的数据共享机制(扩展版)

Collaborative causal inference (CCI) is a federated learning method for pooling data from multiple, often self-interested, parties, to achieve a common learning goal over causal structures, e.g. estimation and optimization of treatment variables in a medical setting. Since obtaining data can be costly for the participants and sharing unique data poses the risk of losing competitive advantages, motivating the participation of all parties through equitable rewards and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Linear causal disentanglement via higher-order cumulants

通过高阶累积量实现线性因果解耦

Linear causal disentanglement is a recent method in causal representation learning to describe a collection of observed variables via latent variables with causal dependencies between them. It can be viewed as a generalization of both independent component analysis and linear structural equation models. We study the identifiability of linear causal disentanglement, assuming access to data under multiple contexts, each given by an intervention on a latent variable. We show…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Treatment effect estimation under covariate-adaptive randomization with heavy-tailed outcomes

重尾结果下协变量自适应随机化的处理效应估计

Randomized experiments are the gold standard for investigating causal relationships, with comparisons of potential outcomes under different treatment groups used to estimate treatment effects. However, outcomes with heavy-tailed distributions pose significant challenges to traditional statistical approaches. While recent studies have explored these issues under simple randomization, their application in more complex randomization designs, such as stratified randomization or…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Fast Proxy Experiment Design for Causal Effect Identification

用于因果效应识别的快速代理实验设计

Identifying causal effects is a key problem of interest across many disciplines. The two long-standing approaches to estimate causal effects are observational and experimental (randomized) studies. Observational studies can suffer from unmeasured confounding, which may render the causal effects unidentifiable. On the other hand, direct experiments on the target variable may be too costly or even infeasible to conduct. A middle ground between these two approaches is to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Convexified Matching Approach to Imputation and Individualized Inference

用于插补与个体化推断的凸化匹配方法

We introduce a new convexified matching method for missing value imputation and individualized inference inspired by computational optimal transport. Our method integrates favorable features from mainstream imputation approaches: optimal matching, regression imputation, and synthetic control. We impute counterfactual outcomes based on convex combinations of observed outcomes, defined based on an optimal coupling between the treated and control data sets. The optimal coupling…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Practical Guide for Causal Pathways and Sub-group Disparity Analysis

因果路径与子群差异分析的实用指南

In this study, we introduce the application of causal disparity analysis to unveil intricate relationships and causal pathways between sensitive attributes and the targeted outcomes within real-world observational data. Our methodology involves employing causal decomposition analysis to quantify and examine the causal interplay between sensitive attributes and outcomes. We also emphasize the significance of integrating heterogeneity assessment in causal disparity analysis to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Enabling Causal Discovery in Post-Nonlinear Models with Normalizing Flows

用归一化流实现后非线性模型的因果发现

Post-nonlinear (PNL) causal models stand out as a versatile and adaptable framework for modeling intricate causal relationships. However, accurately capturing the invertibility constraint required in PNL models remains challenging in existing studies. To address this problem, we introduce CAF-PoNo (Causal discovery via Normalizing Flows for Post-Nonlinear models), harnessing the power of the normalizing flows architecture to enforce the crucial invertibility constraint in…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A General Framework for Design-Based Treatment Effect Estimation in Paired Cluster-Randomized Experiments

配对整群随机实验中基于设计的处理效应估计框架

Paired cluster-randomized experiments (pCRTs) are common in education program impact evaluation trials. Although common, there is surprisingly no clear consensus regarding how to analyze this randomization design to estimate average treatment effects. Variance estimation is also complicated due to the dependency created through pairing clusters. Therefore, we aim to provide an intuitive and practical comparison between different estimation strategies for pCRTs to inform…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Robust CATE Estimation Using Novel Ensemble Methods

使用新型集成方法稳健估计条件平均处理效应

The estimation of Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATE) is crucial for understanding the heterogeneity of treatment effects in clinical trials. We evaluate the performance of common methods, including causal forests and various meta-learners, across a diverse set of scenarios, revealing that each of the methods struggles in one or more of the tested scenarios. Given the inherent uncertainty of the data-generating process in real-life scenarios, the robustness of a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Detecting and Understanding the Difference between Natural Mediation Effects and Their Randomized Interventional Analogues

自然中介效应与随机干预类比量差异的检测与理解

In causal mediation analysis, the natural direct and indirect effects (natural effects) are nonparametrically unidentifiable in the presence of treatment-induced confounding, which motivated the development of randomized interventional analogues (RIAs) of the natural effects. Being easier to identify, the RIAs are becoming widely used in practice. However, applied researchers often interpret RIA estimates as if they were the natural effects, even though the RIAs can be poor…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Conformal Prediction for Causal Effects of Continuous Treatments

连续治疗因果效应的共形预测

Uncertainty quantification of causal effects is crucial for safety-critical applications such as personalized medicine. A powerful approach for this is conformal prediction, which has several practical benefits due to model-agnostic finite-sample guarantees. Yet, existing methods for conformal prediction of causal effects are limited to binary/discrete treatments and make highly restrictive assumptions such as known propensity scores. In this work, we provide a novel…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bayesian Structured Mediation Analysis With Unobserved Confounders

含未观测混杂因素的贝叶斯结构化中介分析

We explore methods to reduce the impact of unobserved confounders on the causal mediation analysis of high-dimensional mediators with spatially smooth structures, such as brain imaging data. The key approach is to incorporate the latent individual effects, which influence the structured mediators, as unobserved confounders in the outcome model, thereby potentially debiasing the mediation effects. We develop BAyesian Structured Mediation analysis with Unobserved confounders…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

Identification of Average Marginal Effects in Fixed Effects Dynamic Discrete Choice Models

固定效应动态离散选择模型中平均边际效应的识别

In nonlinear panel data models, fixed effects methods are often criticized because they cannot identify average marginal effects (AMEs) in short panels. The common argument is that identifying AMEs requires knowledge of the distribution of unobserved heterogeneity, but this distribution is not identified in a fixed effects model with a short panel. In this paper, we derive identification results that contradict this argument. In a panel data dynamic logit model, and for $T$ a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓